Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 279–288 | Cite as

The Goals and Merits of a Business Ethics Competency Exam

  • Earl W. Spurgin

Abstract

My university recently established a business ethics competency exam for graduate business students. The exam is designed to test whether students can demonstrate several abilities that are indicative of competency in business ethics. They are the abilities to “speak the language” of business ethics, identify business ethics issues, apply theories and concepts to issues, identify connections among theories and concepts as they relate to different issues, and construct and critically evaluate arguments for various positions on business ethics issues. Through this paper, I hope to begin a discussion among business ethicists about both the merits of a competency exam and what the format of such an exam should be. I attempt to do this by explaining the reasons why my institution adopted a competency exam, the goals and purposes of the exam, the format of the exam, and why I believe the exam has merit.

business ethics case analysis competency exam ethical concepts ethical issues ethical theories exam format exam goals graduate business programs undergraduate business programs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carson, T. L.: 1998, 'Ethical Issues in Sales: Two Case Studies', Journal of Business Ethics 17(7), 725–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jennings, M. M.: 1999, 'Slotting, Facilitation, Costs or Bribery', in Business Ethics: Case Studies and Selected Readings, 3rd edn. (West Educational Publishing Company, Cincinnati), pp. 215–219.Google Scholar
  3. John Carroll University: 2002–2004, Graduate School Bulletin.Google Scholar
  4. Hasnas, J.: 1993, 'The Hazards of the Enterprise', in T. Donaldson and A. Gini (eds.), Case Studies in Business Ethics, 4th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996), pp. 141–143.Google Scholar
  5. Lawrence, A. T.: 1993, 'Johnson Controls and Protective Exclusion from the Workplace', in J. R. Boatright (ed.), Cases in Ethics and the Conduct of Business (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995), pp. 148–159.Google Scholar
  6. Meredith, R.: 1997, 'Male Bastion for Dealmaking Under Attack', The New York Times 1 (September 20), 25.Google Scholar
  7. Munson, R. and D. A. Conway.: 2001, Basics of Reasoning (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  8. Shaw, W. H. 2002, 'Speaking Out About Malt', in Business Ethics, 4th edn. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA), pp. 229–231.Google Scholar
  9. Vandivier, K.: 1972, 'The Aircraft Brake Scandal', in T. Donaldson and P. H. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996), pp. 345–356.Google Scholar
  10. Velasquez, M. G.: 1986, 'Toy Wars', in Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002), pp. 379–383.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Earl W. Spurgin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyJohn Carroll UniversityUniversity HeightsU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations