Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 175–187 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World's Most Successful Firms

  • Jamie Snider
  • Ronald Paul Hill
  • Diane Martin
Article

Abstract

This investigation is motivated by the lack of scholarship examining the content of what firms are communicating to various stakeholders about their commitment to socially responsible behaviors. To address this query, a qualitative study of the legal, ethical and moral statements available on the websites of Forbes Magazine's top 50 U.S. and top 50 multinational firms of non-U.S. origin were analyzed within the context of stakeholder theory. The results are presented thematically, and the close provides implications for social responsibility among managers of global organizations as well as researchers interested in business ethics.

Keywords

Economic Growth Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Social Responsibility Qualitative Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikat, D.:, 'A New Medium for Organizational Communication: Analyzing Web Content Characteristics of Fortune 500 Companies', Electronic Journal of Communication 10(1, 2).Google Scholar
  2. Browning, E. S.: 2002, 'Investor Confidence Remains Fickle-Dow Barely Above Post-Sept. 11 Low as S & P, NASDAQ Still Languish, Terrorism is Discounted as Factor', The Wall Street Journal (Sept 9), C1.Google Scholar
  3. Carroll, A.: 1999, 'Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct', Business and Society 38(3), 268-295.Google Scholar
  4. Coombs, T.: 1998, 'The Internet as a Potential Equalizer: New Leverage for Confronting Social Irresponsibility', Public Relations Review 24(3), 289-303.Google Scholar
  5. Esrock, S. and G. Leichty: 1998, 'Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Selfpresentation or Agenda Setting? Public Relations Review 24(3), 305-319.Google Scholar
  6. Esrock, S. and G. Leichty: 1999, 'Corporate World Wide Web Pages: Serving the News Media and other Publics', Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 76(3), 456-467.Google Scholar
  7. Esrock, S. and G. Leichty: 2000, 'Organization of Corporate Web Pages: Publics and Functions', Public Relations Review 26(3), 327-344.Google Scholar
  8. Forbes 500s: 2002, www.forbes.com.Google Scholar
  9. Forbes International 500: 2001, www.forbes.com.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, R., D. Owen and C. Adams: 1996, Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (Prentice Hall, London).Google Scholar
  11. Gibbs, N.: 2002, 'Summer of Mistrust', Time 160(4), 16-20.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, R. P.: 1994, 'Bill Collectors and Consumers: A Troublesome Exchange Relationship', Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 13(1), 20-35.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, R. P. and K. Dhanda: 2002, 'Advertising, Technology, and the Digital Divide: A Global Perspective', Advances in International Marketing: New Directions in International Advertising Research 12, 175-193.Google Scholar
  14. Hooghiemstra, R.: 2000, 'Corporate Communication and Impression Management-New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting', Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2), 55-68.Google Scholar
  15. Kok, P., T. V. D. Weile, R. McKenna and A. Brown: 2001, 'A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit within a Quality Management Framework', Journal of Business Ethics 31(4), 285-297.Google Scholar
  16. Maignan, I. and D. Ralston: 2002, 'Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from Businesses' Self Presentations', Journal of International Business Studies 33(3), 497-514.Google Scholar
  17. Maitland, A.: 2002, 'How to Become Good in all Areas: Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR is Here to Stay-But It is Unfamiliar Territory for Most Managers', The Financial Times (London) (September 11), 15.Google Scholar
  18. Marken, G. A.: 1998, 'The Internet and the Web: The Two-way Public Relations Highway', Online Public Relations 43(1), 31-33.Google Scholar
  19. Master, M. and E. J. Heresniak: 2002, 'Ethics at Work: The Disconnect in Ethics Training', Across the Board 39(5), 51-52.Google Scholar
  20. McCracken, G.: 1988, The Long Interview (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  21. Ozanne, J. L., R. P. Hill and N. Wright: 1998, 'Juvenile Delinquents' Use of Consumption as Cultural Resistance: Implications for Juvenile Reform Programs and Public Policy', Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 17(2), 185-196.Google Scholar
  22. Patten, D. M.: 2002, 'Give or Take on the Internet: An Examination of the Disclosure Practices of Insurance Firm Web Innovators', Journal of Business Ethics 36(3), 247-259.Google Scholar
  23. Paul, P.: 2002, 'Corporate Responsibility', American Demographics 24(5), 24.Google Scholar
  24. Pinkston, T. and A. Carroll: 1996, 'A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed?' Journal of Business Ethics 15(2), 199-207.Google Scholar
  25. Robertson, D. C. and N. Nicholsom: 1996, 'Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibility in U.K. Firms', Journal of Business Ethics 15(10), 1095-1106.Google Scholar
  26. Wertz, F. J.: 1983, 'From Everyday to Psychological Description: Analyzing the Moments of a Qualitative Data Analysis', Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 14(2), 197-241.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamie Snider
    • 1
  • Ronald Paul Hill
    • 1
  • Diane Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.St. PetersburgU.S.A

Personalised recommendations