Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 45–57

Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors After a Recurrence: A Follow-Up Study

  • Sindy Oh
  • Lara Heflin
  • Beth E. Meyerowitz
  • Katherine A. Desmond
  • Julia H. Rowland
  • Patricia A. Ganz
Article

Abstract

Previous studies on breast cancer recurrence provide a mixed picture of the quality of life of women following a recurrence. To clarify the picture, the present study addresses some previous methodological concerns by offering a multidimensional assessment with follow-up, a matched comparison group of disease-free survivors, and a closer look at the nature of recurrence (local versus metastatic). Fifty-Four of 817 women who participated in an earlier study experienced a recurrence at follow-up, and are compared to a matched sample of 54 women who remained disease-free. Analyses indicate that women who had a recurrence report significantly poorer functioning on various health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains compared to women who remained disease-free. However, the differences appear to be largely due to the poorer HRQOL of women with metastatic disease. Although women who had a recurrence report good mood, low stress, and good quality of interpersonal relationships, they report significantly higher cancer-specific stress compared to disease-free women at follow-up. Women who had a recurrence also report experiencing both more meaning and vulnerability as a result of breast cancer than disease-free women, but report similar levels of spirituality and benefit-finding at follow-up as disease-free women. These results suggest that although women report relatively good psychosocial adjustment following a recurrence, cancer-specific domains of quality of life are most likely to be negatively affected. These results may be useful in identifying individuals with breast cancer recurrences who are most in need of psychosocial services.

breast cancer cancer survivors psychosocial adjustment quality of life recurrence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Silverfarb PM, Maurer LH, Crouthamel CS: Psychosocial aspects of neoplastic disease: I. Functional status of breast cancer patients during different treatment regimens. Am J Psychiatry 137: 450–455, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Northouse LL, Laten D, Reddy P: Adjustment of women and their husbands to recurrent breast cancer. Res Nurs Health 18: 515–524, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McEnvoy MD, McCorkle R: Quality of life issues in patients with disseminated breast cancer. Cancer 66 (6 Suppl.): 1416–1421, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahon SM, Cella DF, Donovan MI: Psychosocial adjustment to recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 17: 47–52, 1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ballard A, Green T, McCaa A, Logsdon MC: A comparison of the level of hope in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 24: 899–904, 1997PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weisman AD, Worden JW: The emotional impact of recurrent cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 3: 5–16, 1986Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Given B, Given CW: Patient and family caregiver reaction to new and recurrent breast cancer. J Am Med Womens Assoc 47: 201–206, 212, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Munkres A, Oberst MT, Hughes SH: Appraisal of illness, symptom distress, self-care burden, and mood states in patients receiving chemotherapy for initial and recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 19: 1201–1209, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frost MH, Suman VJ, Rummans TA, Dose AM, Taylor M, Novotny P, Johnson R, Evans, RE: Physical, psychological and social well-being of women with breast cancer: the inffuence of disease phase. Psychooncology 9: 221–231, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le MG, Arriagada R, Spielmann M, Guinebretiere JM, Rochard F: Prognostic factors for death after an isolated local recurrence in patients with early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 94: 2813–2820, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bull AA, Meyerowitz BE, Hart S, Mosconi P, Apolone G, Liberati A: Quality of life in women with recurrent breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 54: 47–57, 1999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurney C, Bernhard J, Coates AS, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Peterson HF, Gelber RD, Forbes JF, Rudenstam C-M, Simoncini E, Crivellari D, Goldhirsch A, Senn H-J, for the International Breast Cancer Study Group: impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive breast cancer. Lancet 347: 1279–1284, 1996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jenkins PL, May VE, Hughes LE: Psychological morbidity associated with local recurrence of breast cancer. Int J Psychiatry Med 21: 149–155, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okamura H, Watanabe T, Narabayashi M, Katsumata N, Ando M, Adachi I, Akechi T, Uchitomi Y: Psychological distress following rst recurrence of diseasein patients with breast cancer: prevalence and risk factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 61: 131–137, 2000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Northouse LL, Mood D, Kershaw T, Schafenacker A, Mellon S, Walker J, Galvin E, Decker V: Quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family members. J Clin Oncol 20: 4050–4064, 2002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewis FM, Deal LW: Balancing our lives: a study of the married couple 's experience with breast cancer recurrence. Oncol Nurs Forum 22: 943–953, 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor EJ: Factors associated with meaning in life among people with recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 20: 1399–1405, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR: Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1: 39–49, 1994Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE: Life after breast cancer: understanding women 's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 16: 501–514, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA: Impact of different adjuvant therapy strategies on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Recent Results Cancer Res 152: 396–411, 1998PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473–483, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM: The RAND 36-item Health Survey1. 0. Health Econ 2: 217–227, 1993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr: Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 32: 551–567, 1994PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ware JE Jr, Kosinki M, Keller SD: SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User 's Manual. The Health Institute, Boston, MA, 1994Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    RadloffLS: The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measure 1: 385–401, 1977Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts RE, Vernon SW: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale: its use in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 140: 41–46, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Myers JK, Weissman MM: Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 137: 1081–1084, 1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54: 1063–1070, 1988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiss DS, Marmar CR: The impact of event scale-revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM (eds) Assessing Psychological Trauma. Guilford Press, New York, 1997, pp 399–411Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH: A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther 21: 289–308, 1995Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spanier GB: Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Family 38: 15–28, 1976Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL: The MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med 32: 705–714, 1991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG: The post-traumatic growth inventory. J Trauma Stress 9: 455–472, 1996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holland J, Kash KM, Passik S, Gronert MK, Sison A, Lederberg M, Russak SM, Baider L, Fox B: A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in lifethreatening illnesses. Psychooncology 7: 460–469, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sindy Oh
    • 1
  • Lara Heflin
    • 1
  • Beth E. Meyerowitz
    • 1
  • Katherine A. Desmond
    • 2
  • Julia H. Rowland
    • 3
  • Patricia A. Ganz
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.National Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA
  4. 4.Schools of Medicine and Public Health, and the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations