Brain Topography

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 287–290

ASA-Advanced Source Analysis of Continuous and Event-Related EEG/MEG Signals

  • Frank Zanow
  • Thomas R. Knösche


Sophisticated analysis methods for EEG and MEG play a key role in the better understanding of brain functions as measured by high-density EEG and MEG. Being commercially available since 1996, the ASA software (ANT Software BV, Enschede, Netherlands) has been gaining growing popularity among clinical and cognitive researchers. With the following article, we present an overview on the currently available functionality of the software and provide examples of its application.

ASA EEG/MEG Source reconstruction Software Inverse methods 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. van Burik, M., Knösche, T.R., Neuper, C., Pfurtscheller, G. and Peters, M.J. Post-movement beta synchronization studied with linear estimation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1998, 106: 195–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clochon, P., Fontbonne, J.M., Lebrun, N. and Etévenon, P. A new method for quantifying EEG event-related desynchronization: amplitude envelope analysis. Electro-encephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1996, 98: 126–129.Google Scholar
  3. Dale, A.M., Liu, A.K., Fischl, B.R., Buckner, R.L., Belliveau, J.W., Lewine, J.D. and Halgren, E. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron, 2000, 26(1): 55–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhond, R.P., Marinkovic, K., Dale, A.M., Witzel, T. and Halgren, E. Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verb inflection. NeuroImage, 2003, 19(1): 91–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferguson, A.S., Zhang, X. and Stroink, X. A complete linear discretisation for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1994, 41: 455–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hämäläinen, M.S. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: estimates of current distribution (Helsinki: University of Technology, Dept. of Technical Physics Report TKK-F-A559) (1984).Google Scholar
  7. Haueisen, J. and Knösche, T.R. Involuntary motor activation in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2001, 13: 786–792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Knösche, T.R., Praamstra, P., Stegeman, D. and Peters, M.J. Linear Estimation discriminates midline source and motor cortex contribution to readiness potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1996, 99: 183–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Knösche, T.R., Maeß, B. and Friederici, A.D. Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain surface current density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topography, 1999, 12(2): 75–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Knösche, T.R., Lattner, S., Maess, B., Schauer, M. and Friederici, A.D. Early parallel processing of auditory word and voice information. NeuroImage, 2002, 17: 1493–1503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Knösche, T.R. and Bastiaansen, M.C.M. On the time resolution of event-related desychronization: a simulation study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002, 113: 754–763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mosher, J.C., Lewis, P.S. and Leahy, R.M. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1992, 39: 541–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W.K. and Mantysalo, S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta. Psychologica., 1978, 42: 313–329.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Näätänen, R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology, 2001, 38: 1–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nunez, P.L. Electric fields of the brain. New York: Oxford University, (1981).Google Scholar
  16. Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Michel, C.M. and Lehmann, D. Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography-a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1994, 18(1): 49–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfurtscheller, G. and Aranibar, A. Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1977, 42: 817–826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. 2 bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1985, 62(1): 32–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Scherg, M. and Berg, P. Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis. Brain Topography, 1991, 4: 143–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sussmann, E., Ritter, W. and Vaughan, H.G. Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Research, 1998, 789: 130–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sussmann, E., Ritter, W.and Vaughan, H.G. Aninvestigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 1999, 36(1): 22–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tervaniemi, M., Maury, S. and Näätänen, R. Neural representations of abstract stimulus features in the humanbrain as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Neuroreport, 1994, 5(7): 844–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Veen, B.D., Van Drongelen, W., Yuchtman, M. and Suzuki, A. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1997, 44: 867–880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Vrba, J. and Robinson, S.E. Signal processing in magneto-encephalography. Methods, 2001, 25: 249–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zanow, F. Realistically shaped models of the head and theiraApplication to EEG and MEG. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands (1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Zanow
    • 1
  • Thomas R. Knösche
    • 2
  1. 1.ANT Software BVEnschedeNetherlands
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute of Cognitive NeuroscienceLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations