Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 112, Issue 2, pp 307–341 | Cite as

Large-Eddy Simulation of Coherent Turbulence Structures Associated with Scalar Ramps Over Plant Canopies

  • Tsutomu Watanabe
Article

Abstract

Large-eddy simulations were performed of a neutrally-stratified turbulent flow within and above an ideal, horizontally- and vertically-homogeneous plant canopy. Three simulations were performed for shear-driven flows in small and large computational domains, and a pressure-driven flow in a small domain, to enable the nature of canopy turbulence unaffected by external conditions to be captured. The simulations reproduced quite realistic canopy turbulence characteristics, including typical ramp structures appearing in time traces of the scalar concentration near the canopy top. Then, the spatial structure of the organised turbulence that caused the scalar ramps was examined using conditional sampling of three-dimensional instantaneous fields, triggered by the occurrence of ramp structures. A wavelet transform was used for the detection of ramp structures in the time traces. The ensemble-averaged results illustrate that the scalar ramps are associated with the microfrontal structure in the scalar, the ejection-sweep structure in the streamwise and vertical velocities, a laterally divergent flow just around the ramp-detection point, and a positive, vertically-coherent pressure perturbation. These vertical structures were consistent with previous measurements made in fields or wind tunnels. However, the most striking feature is that the horizontal slice of the same structure revealed a streamwise-elongated region of high-speed streamwise velocity impacting on another elongated region of low-speed velocity. These elongated structures resemble the so-called streak structures that are commonly observed in near-wall shear layers. Since elongated structures of essentially similar spatial scales were observed in all of the runs, these streak structures appear to be inherent in near-canopy turbulence. Presumably, strong wind shear formed just above the canopy is involved in their formation. By synthesis of the ensemble-averaged and instantaneous results, the following processes were inferred for the development of scalar microfronts and their associated flow structures: (1) a distinct scalar microfront develops where a coherent downdraft associated with a high-speed streak penetrates into the region of a low-speed streak; (2) a stagnation in flow between two streaks of different velocities builds up a vertically-coherent high-pressure region there; (3) the pressure gradients around the high-pressure region work to reduce the longitudinal variations in streamwise velocity and to enhance the laterally-divergent flow and lifted updrafts downstream of the microfront; (4) as the coherent mother downdraft impinges on the canopy, canopy-scale eddies are formed near the canopy top in a similar manner as observed in conventional mixing-layer turbulence.

Coherent turbulence structure Conditional sampling Large-eddy simulation Microfront Plant canopy Scalar concentration Streaks Wavelet analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BergstrÖm, H. and HÖgstrÖm, U.: 1989, ‘Turbulent Exchange Above a Pine Forest. II. Organized Structures’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 49, 231–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collineau, S. and Brunet, Y.: 1993a, ‘Detection of Turbulent Coherent Motions in a Forest Canopy. Part I: Wavelet Analysis’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 65, 357–379.Google Scholar
  3. Collineau, S. and Brunet, Y.: 1993b, ‘Detection of Turbulent Coherent Motions in a Forest Canopy. Part I: Time-Scales and Conditional Averages’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 66, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deardorff, J. W.: 1970, ‘A Numerical Study of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Channel Flow at Large Reynolds Numbers’, J. Fluid Mech. 41, 453–480.Google Scholar
  5. Finnigan, J. J.: 1979, ‘Turbulence in Waving Wheat. II. Structure of Momentum Transfer’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 16, 213–236.Google Scholar
  6. Finnigan, J. J.: 2000, ‘Turbulence in Plant Canopies’, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 519–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finnigan, J. J. and Shaw, R. H.: 2000, ‘A Wind-Tunnel Study of Airflow in Waving Wheat: An EOF Analysis of the Structure of the Large-Eddy Motion’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 96, 211–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao, W., Shaw, R. H., and Paw U, K. T.: 1989, ‘Observation of Organized Structure in Turbulent Flow Within and Above a Forest Canopy’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 47, 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Inoue, E.: 1955a, ‘Studies of the Phenomena of Waving Plants (“HONAMI”) Caused by Wind. Part 1: Mechanism and Characteristics of Waving Plants Phenomena’, J. Agric. Meteorol. (Japan) 11, 18–22 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  10. Inoue, E.: 1955b, ‘Studies of the Phenomena of Waving Plants (“HONAMI”) Caused by Wind. Part 2: Spectra of Waving Plants and Plants Vibration’, J. Agric. Meteorol. (Japan) 11, 87–90 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  11. Inoue, E.: 1963, ‘On the Turbulent Structure of Airflow within Crop Canopies’, J. Agric. Meteorol (Japan) 41, 317–326.Google Scholar
  12. Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: 1994, Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 289 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Kanda, M. and Hino, M.: 1994, ‘Organized Structures in Developing Turbulent Flow Within and Above a Plant Canopy, Using a Large-Eddy Simulation’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 68, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lele, S. K.: 1992, ‘Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral-Like resolution’, J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, C.-L., McWilliams, J. C., Moeng, C.-H., and Sullivan, P. P.: 1996, ‘Coherent Structures and Dynamics in a Neutrally Stratified Planetary Boundary Layer Flow’, Phys. Fluid 8, 2626–2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu, C.-H. and Fitzjarrald, D. R.: 1994, ‘Seasonal and Diurnal Variations of Coherent Structures over a Deciduous Forest’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 69, 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moeng, C.-H.: 1984, ‘A Large-Eddy-Simulation Model for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence’, J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2052–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moeng, C.-H. and Sullivan, P. P.: 1994, ‘A Comparison of Shear-and Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary Layer Flows’, J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moeng, C.-H. and Wyngaard, J. C.: 1988, ‘Spectral Analysis of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Convective Boundary Layer’, J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 3573–3587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moin, P. and Kim, J.: 1982, ‘Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Channel Flow’, J. Fluid Mech. 118, 341–377.Google Scholar
  21. Orszag, S. A.: 1971, ‘On the Elimination of Aliasing in Finite-Difference Schemes by Filtering High-Wavenumber Components’, J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patton, E. G., Shaw, R. H., Judd, M. J., and Raupach, M. R.: 1998, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Windbreak Flow’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 87, 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raupach, M. R. and Thom, A. S.: 1981, ‘Turbulence In and Above Plant Canopies’, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 97–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J., and Brunet, Y.: 1996, ‘Coherent Eddies and Turbulence in Vegetation Canopies: The Mixing Layer Analogy’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 78, 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schumann, U.: 1975, ‘Subgrid Scale Model for Finite Difference Simulations of Turbulent Flows in Plane Channels and Annuli’, J. Comput. Phys. 18, 376–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaw, R. H. and Patton, E. G.: 2003, ‘Canopy Element Influences on Resolved-and Subgrid-Scale Energy within a Large-Eddy Simulation’, Agric. For. Meteorol. 115, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shaw, R. H. and Schumann, U.: 1992, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Above and Within a Forest’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 61, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaw, R. H. and Zhang, X. J.: 1992, ‘Evidence of Pressure-Forced Turbulent Flow in a Forest’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 58, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shaw, R. H., Brunet, Y., Finnigan, J. J., and Raupach, M. R.: 1995, ‘A Wind Tunnel Study of Air Flow in Waving Wheat: Two-Point Velocity Statistics’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 76, 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaw, R. H., Paw U, K. T., and, Gao W.: 1989, ‘Detection of Temperature Ramps and Flow Structures at a Deciduous Forest Site’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 47, 123–138.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, R. H., Paw U, K. T., Zhang, X. J., Gao, W., Den Hartog, G., and Neumann, H. H.: 1990, ‘Retrieval of Turbulent Pressure Fluctuations at the Ground Surface Beneath a Forest’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Su, H.-B., Shaw, R. H., Paw U, K. T., Moeng, C.-H., and Sullivan, P. P.: 1998, ‘Turbulent Statistics of Neutrally Stratified Flow Within and Above a Sparse Forest from Large-Eddy Simulation and Field Observations’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 88, 363–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Su, H.-B., Shaw, R. H., and Paw U, K. T.: 2000, ‘Two-Point Correlation Analysis of Neutrally Stratified Flow Within and Above a Forest from Large-Eddy Simulation’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 49, 423–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yasuda, Y. and Watanabe, T.: 2001, ‘Comparative Measurements of CO2 Flux Over a Forest Using Closed-Path and Open-Path CO2 Analysers’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 100, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williamson, J. H.: 1980, ‘Low-Storage Runge-Kutta Schemes’, J. Comput. Phys. 35, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhuang, Y. and Amiro, B. D.: 1994, ‘Pressure Fluctuations during Coherent Motions and their Effects on the Budgets of Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Momentum Flux within a Forest Canopy’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 33, 704–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tsutomu Watanabe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Meteorological EnvironmentForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukuba, IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations