# Large-Eddy Simulation of Coherent Turbulence Structures Associated with Scalar Ramps Over Plant Canopies

- 451 Downloads
- 66 Citations

## Abstract

Large-eddy simulations were performed of a neutrally-stratified turbulent flow within and above an ideal, horizontally- and vertically-homogeneous plant canopy. Three simulations were performed for shear-driven flows in small and large computational domains, and a pressure-driven flow in a small domain, to enable the nature of canopy turbulence unaffected by external conditions to be captured. The simulations reproduced quite realistic canopy turbulence characteristics, including typical ramp structures appearing in time traces of the scalar concentration near the canopy top. Then, the spatial structure of the organised turbulence that caused the scalar ramps was examined using conditional sampling of three-dimensional instantaneous fields, triggered by the occurrence of ramp structures. A wavelet transform was used for the detection of ramp structures in the time traces. The ensemble-averaged results illustrate that the scalar ramps are associated with the microfrontal structure in the scalar, the ejection-sweep structure in the streamwise and vertical velocities, a laterally divergent flow just around the ramp-detection point, and a positive, vertically-coherent pressure perturbation. These vertical structures were consistent with previous measurements made in fields or wind tunnels. However, the most striking feature is that the horizontal slice of the same structure revealed a streamwise-elongated region of high-speed streamwise velocity impacting on another elongated region of low-speed velocity. These elongated structures resemble the so-called streak structures that are commonly observed in near-wall shear layers. Since elongated structures of essentially similar spatial scales were observed in all of the runs, these streak structures appear to be inherent in near-canopy turbulence. Presumably, strong wind shear formed just above the canopy is involved in their formation. By synthesis of the ensemble-averaged and instantaneous results, the following processes were inferred for the development of scalar microfronts and their associated flow structures: (1) a distinct scalar microfront develops where a coherent downdraft associated with a high-speed streak penetrates into the region of a low-speed streak; (2) a stagnation in flow between two streaks of different velocities builds up a vertically-coherent high-pressure region there; (3) the pressure gradients around the high-pressure region work to reduce the longitudinal variations in streamwise velocity and to enhance the laterally-divergent flow and lifted updrafts downstream of the microfront; (4) as the coherent mother downdraft impinges on the canopy, canopy-scale eddies are formed near the canopy top in a similar manner as observed in conventional mixing-layer turbulence.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- BergstrÖm, H. and HÖgstrÖm, U.: 1989, ‘Turbulent Exchange Above a Pine Forest. II. Organized Structures’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***49**, 231–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Collineau, S. and Brunet, Y.: 1993a, ‘Detection of Turbulent Coherent Motions in a Forest Canopy. Part I: Wavelet Analysis’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***65**, 357–379.Google Scholar - Collineau, S. and Brunet, Y.: 1993b, ‘Detection of Turbulent Coherent Motions in a Forest Canopy. Part I: Time-Scales and Conditional Averages’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***66**, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Deardorff, J. W.: 1970, ‘A Numerical Study of Three-Dimensional Turbulent Channel Flow at Large Reynolds Numbers’,
*J. Fluid Mech.***41**, 453–480.Google Scholar - Finnigan, J. J.: 1979, ‘Turbulence in Waving Wheat. II. Structure of Momentum Transfer’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***16**, 213–236.Google Scholar - Finnigan, J. J.: 2000, ‘Turbulence in Plant Canopies’,
*Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.***32**, 519–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Finnigan, J. J. and Shaw, R. H.: 2000, ‘A Wind-Tunnel Study of Airflow in Waving Wheat: An EOF Analysis of the Structure of the Large-Eddy Motion’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***96**, 211–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gao, W., Shaw, R. H., and Paw U, K. T.: 1989, ‘Observation of Organized Structure in Turbulent Flow Within and Above a Forest Canopy’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***47**, 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Inoue, E.: 1955a, ‘Studies of the Phenomena of Waving Plants (“HONAMI”) Caused by Wind. Part 1: Mechanism and Characteristics of Waving Plants Phenomena’,
*J. Agric. Meteorol. (Japan)***11**, 18–22 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar - Inoue, E.: 1955b, ‘Studies of the Phenomena of Waving Plants (“HONAMI”) Caused by Wind. Part 2: Spectra of Waving Plants and Plants Vibration’,
*J. Agric. Meteorol. (Japan)***11**, 87–90 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar - Inoue, E.: 1963, ‘On the Turbulent Structure of Airflow within Crop Canopies’,
*J. Agric. Meteorol (Japan)***41**, 317–326.Google Scholar - Kaimal, J. C. and Finnigan, J. J.: 1994,
*Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows*, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 289 pp.Google Scholar - Kanda, M. and Hino, M.: 1994, ‘Organized Structures in Developing Turbulent Flow Within and Above a Plant Canopy, Using a Large-Eddy Simulation’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***68**, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lele, S. K.: 1992, ‘Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral-Like resolution’,
*J. Comput. Phys.***10**3, 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lin, C.-L., McWilliams, J. C., Moeng, C.-H., and Sullivan, P. P.: 1996, ‘Coherent Structures and Dynamics in a Neutrally Stratified Planetary Boundary Layer Flow’,
*Phys. Fluid***8**, 2626–2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lu, C.-H. and Fitzjarrald, D. R.: 1994, ‘Seasonal and Diurnal Variations of Coherent Structures over a Deciduous Forest’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***69**, 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moeng, C.-H.: 1984, ‘A Large-Eddy-Simulation Model for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence’,
*J. Atmos. Sci.***41**, 2052–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moeng, C.-H. and Sullivan, P. P.: 1994, ‘A Comparison of Shear-and Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary Layer Flows’,
*J. Atmos. Sci.***51**, 999–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moeng, C.-H. and Wyngaard, J. C.: 1988, ‘Spectral Analysis of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Convective Boundary Layer’,
*J. Atmos. Sci.***45**, 3573–3587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moin, P. and Kim, J.: 1982, ‘Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Channel Flow’,
*J. Fluid Mech.***118**, 341–377.Google Scholar - Orszag, S. A.: 1971, ‘On the Elimination of Aliasing in Finite-Difference Schemes by Filtering High-Wavenumber Components’,
*J. Atmos. Sci.***28**, 1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Patton, E. G., Shaw, R. H., Judd, M. J., and Raupach, M. R.: 1998, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Windbreak Flow’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***87**, 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raupach, M. R. and Thom, A. S.: 1981, ‘Turbulence In and Above Plant Canopies’,
*Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.***13**, 97–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J., and Brunet, Y.: 1996, ‘Coherent Eddies and Turbulence in Vegetation Canopies: The Mixing Layer Analogy’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***78**, 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schumann, U.: 1975, ‘Subgrid Scale Model for Finite Difference Simulations of Turbulent Flows in Plane Channels and Annuli’,
*J. Comput. Phys.***18**, 376–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaw, R. H. and Patton, E. G.: 2003, ‘Canopy Element Influences on Resolved-and Subgrid-Scale Energy within a Large-Eddy Simulation’,
*Agric. For. Meteorol.***115**, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaw, R. H. and Schumann, U.: 1992, ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow Above and Within a Forest’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***61**, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaw, R. H. and Zhang, X. J.: 1992, ‘Evidence of Pressure-Forced Turbulent Flow in a Forest’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***58**, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaw, R. H., Brunet, Y., Finnigan, J. J., and Raupach, M. R.: 1995, ‘A Wind Tunnel Study of Air Flow in Waving Wheat: Two-Point Velocity Statistics’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***76**, 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shaw, R. H., Paw U, K. T., and, Gao W.: 1989, ‘Detection of Temperature Ramps and Flow Structures at a Deciduous Forest Site’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***47**, 123–138.Google Scholar - Shaw, R. H., Paw U, K. T., Zhang, X. J., Gao, W., Den Hartog, G., and Neumann, H. H.: 1990, ‘Retrieval of Turbulent Pressure Fluctuations at the Ground Surface Beneath a Forest’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***50**, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Su, H.-B., Shaw, R. H., Paw U, K. T., Moeng, C.-H., and Sullivan, P. P.: 1998, ‘Turbulent Statistics of Neutrally Stratified Flow Within and Above a Sparse Forest from Large-Eddy Simulation and Field Observations’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***88**, 363–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Su, H.-B., Shaw, R. H., and Paw U, K. T.: 2000, ‘Two-Point Correlation Analysis of Neutrally Stratified Flow Within and Above a Forest from Large-Eddy Simulation’,
*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***49**, 423–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yasuda, Y. and Watanabe, T.: 2001, ‘Comparative Measurements of CO
_{2}Flux Over a Forest Using Closed-Path and Open-Path CO_{2}Analysers’,*Boundary-Layer Meteorol.***100**, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Williamson, J. H.: 1980, ‘Low-Storage Runge-Kutta Schemes’,
*J. Comput. Phys.***35**, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zhuang, Y. and Amiro, B. D.: 1994, ‘Pressure Fluctuations during Coherent Motions and their Effects on the Budgets of Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Momentum Flux within a Forest Canopy’,
*J. Appl. Meteorol.***33**, 704–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar