Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 263–281 | Cite as

Toward a more expansive conception of ecological science

  • Kevin de Laplante


There are two competing conceptions of the nature and domain of ecological science in the popular and academic literature, an orthodox conception and a more expansive conception. The orthodox conception conceives ecology as a natural biological science distinct from the human social sciences. The more expansive conception views ecology as a science whose domain properly spans both the natural and social sciences. On the more expansive conception, non-traditional ecological disciplines such as “ecological psychology”, “ecological anthropology” and “ecological economics” may legitimately be regarded as sub-disciplines of ecology, and the practitioners of such disciplines as ecologists. The orthodox-expansionist issue is significant both for the practice of ecology and for the self-identity of the philosophy of ecology. I argue in favour of the expansionist conception of ecology on general conceptual grounds, and by developing the case for one particular non-traditional ecological discipline, ecological psychology.

Ecology Ecological psychology J. J. Gibson Philosophy of ecology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen T.F.H., Tainter J.A. and Hoekstra T.W.: 2003, Supply-Side Sustainability, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Allee W.C., Emerson A.E., Park O., Park T. and Schmidt K.P.: 1949, Principles of Animal Ecology, Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  3. Andrewartha H.G.: 1961, Introduction to the Study of Animal Population, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Begon M., Harper J.L. and Townsend C.R.: 1990, Ecology: Individuals, Populations, and Communities, 2nd. ed., Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bootsma R.: 1988, The Timing of Rapid Interceptive Actions: Perception-Action Coupling in the Control and Acquisition of Skill, Free University Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Bruce V. and Green P.R.: 1990, Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology, 2nd. ed., Laurence Erlbaum Associates, East Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Catton W.R.: 1992, 'Separation Versus Unification in Sociological Human Ecology', in Advances in Human Ecology 1, JAI Press, pp. 65–99.Google Scholar
  8. Clark A.: 1997, Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, MIT Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Costanza R., Segura O. and Martinez-Alier J. (eds.): 1996, Getting Down to Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  10. Erlich P.R.: 1997, 'A World of Wounds: Ecologists and the Human Dilemma', in O. Kinne (ed.), Excellence in Ecology 8, Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe.Google Scholar
  11. Erlich P.R.: 2000, Human Natures: Genes, Cultures and the Human Prospect, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  12. Farber S. and Bradley D.: 1996, Ecological Economics. available at USDA Forest Service website, URL: Scholar
  13. Fodor J.A. and Pylyshyn Z.W.: 1981, 'How Direct is Visual Perception?: Some Reflections on Gibson's “Ecological Approach” ', Cognition 9, 139–196.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson J.J.: 1950, The Perception of the Visual World, Haughton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Gibson J.J.: 1966, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson J.J.: 1979/1986, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Golley F.B.: 1993, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum of the Parts, Yale University Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Golley F.B.: 1994, 'Grounding Environmental Ethics in Ecological Science', in F. Ferre and P. Hartel (eds.), Ethics and Environmental Policy: Theory Meets Practice, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  19. Haila Y. and Taylor P.: 2001, 'The Philosophical Dullness of Classical Ecology, and a Levinsian Alternative', Biology and Philosophy 16, 93–102.Google Scholar
  20. Haskell J.L.: 1940, 'Mathematical Systematization of “Environment”, “Organism” and “Habitat” ', Ecology 21, 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. Heft H.: 1989, 'Affordances and the Body: An Intentional Analysis of Gibson's Ecological Approach to Visual Perception', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19, 1–30.Google Scholar
  22. Holling C.S.: 1998, 'Two Cultures of Ecology', Conservation Ecology {online} 2 (2), 4. Available from the internet. URL: Scholar
  23. Kadar E. and Effken J.: 1994, 'Heideggerian Meditations on an Alternative Ontology for Ecological Psychology: A Response to Turvey's (1992) Proposal', Ecological Psychology 6 (4), 297–341.Google Scholar
  24. Keller D.R. and Golley F.B. (eds.): 2000, The Philosophy of Ecology: From Science to Synthesis, Georgia University Press, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  25. Kelso J.A.S.: 1995, Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behaviour, MIT Press, London.Google Scholar
  26. Krebs C.J.: 2001, Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 5th. ed., Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  27. Lee D.N.: 1980, 'The Optic Flow Field: The Foundation of Vision', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B290, 169–179.Google Scholar
  28. Lee D.N. and Reddish P.: 1981, 'Plummeting Gannets: A Paradigm of Ecological Optics', Nature 293, 293–294.Google Scholar
  29. Lee D.N., Reddish P. and Rand D.T. 1991, 'Aerial Docking by Hummingbirds', Naturwissenschaften 78, 526–527.Google Scholar
  30. Lee D.N., van der Weel F.R., Hitchsock T., Matejowsky E. and Pettigrew J.D.: 1992, 'Common Principle of Guidance by Echolocation and Vision', Journal of Comparative Psychology A171, 78, 526–527.Google Scholar
  31. Lee D.N., Davies M., Green P. and van der Weel F.: 1993, 'Visual Control of Velocity of Approach by Pigeons When Landing', Journal of Experimental Biology 180, 85–104.Google Scholar
  32. ecology.html}).Google Scholar
  33. Lombardo T.J.: 1987, The Reciprocity of Perceiver and Environment: The Evolution of James J. Gibson's Ecological Psychology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  34. McClamrock R.: 1995, Existential Cognition: Computation Minds in the World, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Noble W.: 1981, 'Gibsonian Theory and the Pragmatist Perspective', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11, 65–85.Google Scholar
  36. Odling-Smee F.J., Laland K.N. and Feldman M.W.: 2003, Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  37. Odum H.T.: 1971, Environment, Power, and Society, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Odum H.T. and Odum E.P.: 1976, Energy Basis for Man and Nature, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  39. O'Neill R.V., DeAngeles D.L., Waide J. B. and Allen T.F.H.: 1986, A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  40. Patten B.C.: 1991, 'Network Ecology: Indirect Determination of the Life-Environment Relationship in Ecosystems', in M. Higashi and T.P. Burns (eds.), Theoretical Studies of Ecosystems: The Network Perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 288–351.Google Scholar
  41. Port R.F. and van Gelder T. (eds.): 1995, Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Reed E.S.: 1996, Encountering the World: Toward an Ecological Psychology, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Rowlands M.: 1999, The Body in Mind: Understanding Cognitive Processes, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Rowlands M.: 2000, The Environmental Crisis: Understanding the Value of Nature, St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Shaw R.: 2001, 'Processes, Acts, and Experiences: Three Stances on the Problem of Intentionality', Ecological Psychology 13, 275–314.Google Scholar
  46. Still A. and Good J.: 1998, 'The Ontology of Mutualism', Ecological Psychology 10, 39–63.Google Scholar
  47. Turvey M.T.: 1992, 'Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology', Ecological Psychology 4 (3), 173–187.Google Scholar
  48. Turvey M.T., Shaw R.E., Reed E.S. and Mace W.M.: 1981, 'Ecological Laws of Perceiving and Acting: In Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981)', Cognition 9, 237–304.Google Scholar
  49. Ulanowicz R.E.: 1997, Ecology, The Ascendent Perspective, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Warren W.H.: 1984, 'Perceiving Affordances: Visual Guidance of Stair Climbing', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 683–703.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin de Laplante
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Religious StudiesIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations