Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 243–261 | Cite as

Metaphysical realism as a pre-condition of visual perception

  • Stephen J. Boulter


In this paper I present a transcendental argument based on the findings of cognitive psychology and neurophysiology which invites two conclusions: First and foremost, that a pre-condition of visual perception itself is precisely what the Aristotelian and other commonsense realists maintain, namely, the independent existence of a featured, or pre-packaged world; second, this finding, combined with other reflections, suggests that, contra McDowell and other neo-Kantians, human beings have access to “things as they are in the world” via non-projective perception. These two conclusions taken together form the basis of “Aristotelian” metaphysical realism and a refutation of the neo-Kantian “two-factor” approach to perception.

Anti-realism Aristotle Constructivism Darwin Evolutionary biology Kant Metaphysical realism Visual perception in vertebrates 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aristotle: 1941, 'De Anima and Nicomachean Ethics', in McKeon (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong D.M.: 1961, Perception and the Physical World, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Austin J.L.: 1964, Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Avant L.L.: 1965, 'Vision in the Ganzfeld', Psychological Bulletin 64, 246–258.Google Scholar
  5. Barlow H.B.: 1953, 'Summation and Inhibition in the Frog's Retina', Journal of Physiology 119, 69.Google Scholar
  6. Barlow H.B.: 1958, 'Temporal and Spatial Summation in Human Vision at Different Background Intensities', Journal of Physiology 141, 337.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow H.B. and Levick W.R.: 1965, 'The mechanism of directionally sensitive units in the rabbit's retina', Journal of Physiology 178, 477.Google Scholar
  8. Berkeley G.: 1960, A New Theory of Vision, Dent & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Blakemore C.: 1974, 'Reversal of the Physiological Effects of Monocular Deprivation in Kittens', Journal of Physiology 237, 195.Google Scholar
  10. Blakemore C.: 1978, 'The Physiological Effects of Monocular Deprivation and Their Reversal in the Monkey's Visual Cortex', Journal of Physiology 282, 223.Google Scholar
  11. Boghossian P. and Vellemar J.D.: 1991, 'Physicalist Theories of Colour', Philosophical Review 100, 67–106.Google Scholar
  12. Boulter S.: 1997, 'Putnam's “Home Coming”', Philosophy 7(282), 595–601.Google Scholar
  13. Boulter S.: 2002, 'Hume on Induction: Genuine Problem or Theology's Trojan Horse?', Philosophy 77, 67–86.Google Scholar
  14. Bower T.G.R.: 1974, 'The Evolution of Sensory Systems', in MacLeod and Pick (eds.), Perception: Essays in Honour of James J. Gibson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  15. Bruce V. and Green P.R.: 1990, Perception, Physiology and Ecology, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen W.: 1957, 'Spatial and Textural Characteristics of the Ganzfeld', American Journal of Psychology 70, 403–410.Google Scholar
  17. Deacon T. and Feyerabend P.: 1999, 'Language Evolution and Neuromechanics', in Bechtel and Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Devitt M.: 1997, Realism and Truth, Princton University Press, Princton.Google Scholar
  19. Dretske F.: 1969, Seeing and Knowing, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  20. Dretske F.: 1999, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, CSLI Publications, United States.Google Scholar
  21. Dretske F.: 2002, 'Conscious Experience', in NoË and Thompson (eds.), Vision and Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  22. Feyerabend P.: 1991, Against Method, Verso, London.Google Scholar
  23. Gibson J.J.: 1967, 'New Reasons for Realism', Synthese 17, 162–172.Google Scholar
  24. Gibson J.J.: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  25. Gibson J.J.: 1982, 'A History of the Ideas Behind Ecological Optics', in Reed (ed.), Reasons for Realism, Erlbaum, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  26. Gibson J.J. and Gibson E.: 1982, 'Perceptual Learning: Differentiation or Enrichment?', in Reed and Jones (eds.), Reasons for Realism, Erlbaum, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson J.J. and Waddell: 1952, 'Homogenous Retinal Stimulation and Visual Perception', American Journal of Psychology 65, 263–370.Google Scholar
  28. Gould S.J. and Lewontin R.: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptionist Programme', in Smith and Holliday (eds.), The Evolution of Adaptation by Natural Selection, Royal Society, London, pp.147–164.Google Scholar
  29. Grice P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  30. Guttenplan S.: 1975, Mind and Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Hatfield G. and Epstein W.: 1979, 'The Sensory Core and the Medieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory', Isis 70(253), 363–384.Google Scholar
  32. Hilbert D.R.: 1987, Color and Color Perception: A Study in Anthropocentric Realism, CSLI, Standford.Google Scholar
  33. Hochberg J. Triebel W. and Seaman G.: 1951, 'Color Adaptation under Conditions of Homogenous Visual Stimulation (Ganzfeld)', Journal of Experimental Psychology 41, 153–159.Google Scholar
  34. Hubel D.H.: 1988, Eye, Brian, and Vision, Scientific American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Ittelson W.H.: 1960, Visual Space Perception, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson M.: 1992, 'How to Speak of the Colors', Philosophical Studies 68, 221–263.Google Scholar
  37. Kant I.: 1965, Critique of Pure Reason. Translation by Norman Kemp Smith, St Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Kuffler S.: 1953, 'Discharge Patterns and Functional Organisation of Mammalian Retina', Journal of Neurophysiology 16, 37.Google Scholar
  39. Kuhn T.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Mackay D.: 1991, Behind the Eye, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Marr D.: 1996, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human representation and Processing of Visual Information, Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  42. McDowell J.: 1994a, Mind and World, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. McDowell J.: 1994b, 'The Content of Perceptual Experience', The Philosophical Quarterly 44, 175.Google Scholar
  44. Metzger W.: 1953, Gesetze des Sehens, W. Kramer, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  45. Metzger W.: 1974, 'Can the Subject Create His World?', in MacLeod and Pick (eds.), Perception: Essays in Honour of James J. Gibson, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 62–65.Google Scholar
  46. Milner A. and Goodale M.: 1998, The Visual Srain in Action, Oxford Psychology Series, No. 27, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Mitchell D.E.: 1988, 'The Extent of Visual Recovery from Early Monocular or Binocular Deprivation in Kittens', Journal of Physiology 395, 639.Google Scholar
  48. Marcus R.B.: 1993, Modalities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Natsoulas T.: 1991, '“Why Do Things Look as They Do?”. Some Gibsonian answers to Koffka's question', Philosophical Psychology 4, 2.Google Scholar
  50. Putnam H.: 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  51. Putnam H.: 1994, Words and Life, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rauschecker J. and Singer W.: 1981, 'Visual Deprivation, Stripe Rearing and Hebb Synapses', Journal of Physiology 310, 215.Google Scholar
  53. Roitblat H.: 1999, 'Animal Cognition', in Bechtel and Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  54. St. Thomas Aquinas: 1963, Summa Theologiae, Blackfriars, London.Google Scholar
  55. Searle J.: 1999, The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, London.Google Scholar
  56. Sellars W.: 1956, 'Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind', in Feigl and Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 251–328.Google Scholar
  57. Smart J.J.C.: 1975, 'On Some Criticisms of a Physicalist Theory of Colors', in Cheng (ed.), Philosophical Aspects of the Mind/Body Problem, pp. 54–63.Google Scholar
  58. Turvey M., Shaw R., Reed E. and Mace W.M.: 1981, 'Ecological Laws of Perceiving and Action: In Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn', Cognition 9, 241 and 244.Google Scholar
  59. Vision G.: 1998, 'Perceptual Content', Philosophy 73(285), 395–427.Google Scholar
  60. Wachtershauser G.: 1987, 'Light and Life: The Nutritional Origins of Sensory Perception', in Radnitzky and Bartley (eds.), Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality and the Sociology of Knowledge, Open Court, La Salle, pp. 121–137.Google Scholar
  61. Warrington E.K. and Taylor A.M.: 1973, 'The Contribution of the Right Parietal Lobe to Object Recognition', Cortex 9, 152–164.Google Scholar
  62. Werblin F.S. and Dowling J.E.: 1969, 'Organization of the Retina of the Mudpuppy: Intracellular Recording', Journal of Neurophysiology 32, 339.Google Scholar
  63. Whorf B.: 1956, Language, Thought and Reality, Carroll (ed.), MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Boulter
    • 1
  1. 1.Field Chair for Philosophy, Westminster Institute of EducationOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations