Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 185–203 | Cite as

On fitness

  • Costas B. Krimbas


The concept of fitness, central to population genetics and to the synthetic theory of evolution, is discussed. After a historical introduction on the origin of this concept, the current meaning of it in population genetics is examined: a cause of the selective process and its quantification. Several difficulties arise for its exact definition. Three adequacy criteria for such a definition are formulated. It is shown that it is impossible to formulate an adequate definition of fitness respecting these criteria. The propensity definition of fitness is presented and rejected. Finally it is argued that fitness is a conceptual device, a useful tool, only for descriptive purposes of selective processes, changing from case to case, and thus devoid of any substantial physical counterpart. Any attempt to its reification is an apport to the metaphysical load evolutionary theory has inherited from Natural Theology.

Fitness Population genetics Theory of evolution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed, S. and Hodgkin, J.: 2000, 'MRT-2 Checkpoint Protein is Required for Germline Immortality and Telomere Replication in C. elegans', Nature 403, 159–164.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M.: 1994, Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Birkhead, T.R. and Moller, A.P.: 1998, Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.Google Scholar
  4. Birkhead, T., Schwalbl, H. and Burke, T.: 2000, 'Testosterone and Maternal Effects of Genotype-integrating Mechanisms and Function', TREE (Trends in Ecology and Evolution) 15(3), 86–87.Google Scholar
  5. Brandon, R.N.: 1978, 'Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9, 181–206.Google Scholar
  6. Brandon, R.N.: 1990, Adaptation and Environment., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Brandon, R.N. and Beatty, J.: 1984, 'The Propensity Interpretation of “Fitness”-No Interpretation is No Substitute', Philosophy of Science 51, 342–347.Google Scholar
  8. Brittnacher, J.C. and Ganetsky, B.: 1984, 'On the Components of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Nature of Enhancer of SD', Genetics 107, 423–434.Google Scholar
  9. Burd, M. and Callahan, H.S.: 2000, 'What Does Male Function Hypothesis Claim?', Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 735–742.Google Scholar
  10. Burian, R.: 1983, 'Adaptation', in M. Greene (ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar
  11. Christian, E., Davis, A.A., Thomas, S.D. and Benjamin, I.J.: 2000, 'Maternal Effect of Hsfl on Reproductive Success', Nature 407, 693–694.Google Scholar
  12. Crow, J.F. and Kimura, M.: 1970, An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory, Harper and Row, New York, Evanston, London.Google Scholar
  13. Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species, A Facsimile of the First Edition with an Introduction by Ernst Mayr. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA (1964).Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, R.: 1930, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Reprinted in a Complete Variorum Edition with H. Bennett's Introduction (1999), Oxford University Press, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Gillespie, J.H.: 1973, 'Polymorphism in Random Environments', Theoretical Population Biology 4, 193–195.Google Scholar
  16. Gillespie, J.H.: 1974, 'Natural Selection for Within-generation Variance in Offspring Number', Genetics 76, 601–606.Google Scholar
  17. Gillespie, J.H.: 1975, 'Natural Selection for Within-generation Variance in Offspring Number', Genetics 81, 403–413.Google Scholar
  18. Gillespie, J.H.: 1977, 'Natural Selection for Variances in Offspring Number. A New Evolutionary Principle', American Naturalist 111, 1010–1014.Google Scholar
  19. Gillois, M.: 1996, 'Fitness', in P. Tort (ed.), Dictionnaire du Darwinisme et de l'Évolution (Vol. 2), Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 1676–1688.Google Scholar
  20. Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C.: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique to the Adaptationist Programme', Proceedings of the Royal Society, London Ser. B 205, 581–598.Google Scholar
  21. Hamilton, W.D.: 1964, 'The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour, I', Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–16 {Reprinted in The Collected Papers of D.W. Hamilton: Narrow Roads of Gene Land Vol. 1, Evolution of Social Behaviour, 1995, W.H. Freeman/ Spektrum, Oxford, New York, Heidelberg}.Google Scholar
  22. Hartl, D.L.: 1980, 'Genetics Dissection of Segregation Distortion. III. Unequal Recovery of Reciprocal Recombinants', Genetics 96, 685–696.Google Scholar
  23. Hartl, D.L. and Clarck, A.G.: 1989, Principles of Population Genetics, 2nd Edition, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Hartl, D.L. and Hiraizumi, Y.: 1976, 'Segregation Distortion', in M. Ashburner and E. Novitski (eds.), Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 1b, Academic Press, New York, pp. 615–666Google Scholar
  25. Jacob, F.: 1977, 'Evolution and Tinkering', Science 196, 1161–1166.Google Scholar
  26. Krimbas, C.B.: 1984, 'On Adaptation, Neo-Darwinian Tautology, and Population Fitness', Evolutionary Biology 17, 1–57.Google Scholar
  27. Krimbas, C.B. and Powell, J.R.: 1992, 'Introduction', in C.B. Krimbas and J.R. Powell (eds.), Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, Tokyo, pp. 1–52Google Scholar
  28. Lewontin, R.C.: 1965, 'Selection for Colonizing Ability', in H.G. Baker and G.L. Stebbins (eds.), The Genetics of Colonizing Species, Academic Press, New York, London, pp. 77–94.Google Scholar
  29. Lewontin, R.C. and Ariew, A.: 2002, The Confusion of Fitness, MS in preparation.Google Scholar
  30. Lewontin, R.C. and Dunn, L.C.: 1960, 'The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse', Genetics 45, 705–722.Google Scholar
  31. Lotka, A.J.: 1956, Elements of Mathematical Biology, Dover, New York, Reprinting Elements of Physical Biology (1925), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  32. Mac Arthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O.: 1967, The Theory of Island Biogeography, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. Malthus, T.R.: 1798, An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society, J. Johnson, London.Google Scholar
  34. Mariol, M.-C.: 1981, 'Genetic and Developmental Studies of a New Grandchildless Mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular and General Genetics 181, 505–511.Google Scholar
  35. Maynard Smith, J.: 1991, 'Byerly and Michod on Fitness', Biology and Philosophy 6, 37.Google Scholar
  36. MerÇot, H., Atland, A., Jacques, M. and Montchamp-Moreau, C.: 1995, 'Sex-ratio Distortion in Drosophila simulans: A Co-ocurrence of a Meiotic Drive and Suppressor of Drive', Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8, 283–300.Google Scholar
  37. Michod, R.E.: 1999, Darwinian Dynamics, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  38. Mills S. and Beatty, J.: 1979, 'The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness', Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286.Google Scholar
  39. Niki, Y. and Okada, M.: 1981, 'Isolation and Characterization of Grandchildless-like Mutants in Drosophila melanogaster', Wlhelm Roux's Archives 190, 1–10.Google Scholar
  40. Nishida, H. and Sawada, K.: 2001, 'Macho-1 Encodes a Localized mRNA Ascidian Eggs that Specifies Muscle Fate during Embryogenesis', Nature 409, 724–729.Google Scholar
  41. Paul, D.: 1992, 'Fitness: Historical Perspectives', in E. Fox Keller and E.A. Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 112–114.Google Scholar
  42. Pollak, E.: 1978, 'With Selection for Fecundity the Mean Fitness Does Not Necessarily Increase', Genetics 90, 383–389.Google Scholar
  43. Pourquie, O.: 2001, 'A Macho Way to Make Muscles', Nature 409, 679–680.Google Scholar
  44. Price, G.R.: 1995, 'The Nature of Selection', Journal of Theoretical Biology 175, 389–396.Google Scholar
  45. Reik, W. and Walter, J.: 2001, 'Genomic Imprinting: Parental Influence on the Genome', Nature Reviews, Genetics 2, 21–32.Google Scholar
  46. Reznick, D.A., Bryga, H. and Endler, J.A.: 1990, 'Experimentally Induced Life-history Evolution in a Natural Population', Nature 346, 357–359.Google Scholar
  47. Silver, L.M.: 1985, 'Mouse t Haplotypes', Annual Review of Genetics 19, 179–208.Google Scholar
  48. Sober, E.: 2001, 'The Two Faces of Fitness', in R. Singh, C.B. Krimbas, D. Paul and J. Beatty (eds.), Thinking About Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Oakleigh, Madrid, pp. 309–321Google Scholar
  49. Spencer H.: 1864, Principles of Biology. Vol. A, Williams and Norgate, London (1st Edition).Google Scholar
  50. Spencer H.: 1898, Principles of Biology. Vol. A, Williams and Norgate, London (2nd Edition).Google Scholar
  51. Spurway, H.: 1948, 'Genetics and Cytology of Drosophila subobscura IV. An Extreme Example of Delay in Gene Action, Causing Sterility', J. Genet. 49, 126–140.Google Scholar
  52. Srb, A.M. and Owen, R.D.: 1952, General Genetics, W.H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco, London.Google Scholar
  53. Sturtevant, A.H. and Beadle, G.W.: 1940, An Introduction to Genetics, W.B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  54. Suley, A.C.E.: 1953, 'Genetics of Drosophila subobscura VIII. Studies on the Mutant Grandchildless', J. Genet. 51, 375–405.Google Scholar
  55. Temin, R.G. and Marthas, M.: 1984, 'Factors Influencing the Effect of Segregation Distortion in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster', Genetics 107, 375–393.Google Scholar
  56. Thierry-Mieg, D.: 1982, 'Paralog, a Control Mutant in Drosophila melanogaster', Genetics 100, 209–237.Google Scholar
  57. Van Valen, L.: 1973, 'A New Evolutionary Law', Evolutionary Theory 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
  58. Van Valen, L.: 1976, 'Energy and Evolution', Evolutionary Theory 1, 179–229.Google Scholar
  59. Verhulst, P.F.: 1838, Correspondence Mathematique et Physique PublicÉe par A. Quetelet, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  60. Wolf, J.B. and Wade, M.J.: 2001, 'On the Assignment of Fitness to Parents and Offspring: Whose Fitness Is It and When Does It Matter?', Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 347–356.Google Scholar
  61. Wright, S.: 1969, Evolution and Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  62. Young, S.S.Y.: 1967, 'A Proposition on the Population Dynamics of the Sterile t Alleles in the House Mouse', Evolution 21, 190–198.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Costas B. Krimbas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and History of ScienceUniversity of AthensAno Ilissia (Athens)Greece

Personalised recommendations