Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 1–15 | Cite as

Evolutionary Theory and the Social uses of Biology

  • Philip Kitcher


Stephen Jay Gould is rightly remembered for many different kinds of contributions to our intellectual life. I focus on his criticisms of uses of evolutionary ideas to defend inegalitarian doctrines and on his attempts to expand the framework of Darwinian evolutionary theory. I argue that his important successes in the former sphere are applications of the idea of local critique, grounded in careful attention to the details of the inegalitarian proposals. As he became more concerned with the second project, Gould was inclined to suggest that the abuses of evolutionary ideas rested on an insufficiently expanded Darwinism. I suggest that what is valuable in Gould's contribution to general evolutionary theory is the original claim about punctuated equilibrium (advanced, with Niles Eldredge in1972), and the careful defense of that claim through the accumulation of paleontological evidence. I try to show that the more ambitious program of a hierarchical expansion of neo-Darwinism is misguided, and that the endeavor to go beyond local critique fails.

Evolutionary theory Gould Sociobiology Units of selection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander R.: 1987, The Biology of Moral Systems, De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Buss D.: 1994, The Evolution of Desire, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Dawkins R.: 1982, The Extended Phenotype, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Dawkins R.: 1988, The Blind Watchmaker, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  5. Dennett D.:, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Eldredge N. and Gould S.J.: 1972, 'Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism', in Schopf T.J.M. (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 82–115.Google Scholar
  7. Ghiselin M.: 1974, 'A Radical Solution to the Species Problem', Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.Google Scholar
  8. Gould S.J.: 1977a, Ever Since Darwin, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Gould S.J.: 1977b, Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Gould S.J.: 1981, The Mismeasure of Man, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Gould S.J.: 1982, 'Darwinism and the Expansion of Evolutionary Theory', Science 216, 380–387.Google Scholar
  12. Gould S.J.: 1987, 'Cardboard Darwinism' in An Urchin in the Storm, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Gould S.J.: 2002, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Gould S.J. and Eldredge N.: 1977, 'Punctuated Equilibrium: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered', Paleobiology 3, 115–151.Google Scholar
  15. Gould S.J. and Lewontin R.C.: 1979, 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme', Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 205, 581–598; more readily accessible in Elliott Sober (ed.), Conceptual problems in Evolutionary Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton W.D.: 1996, Narrow Roads of Gene Land, Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Herrnstein and Murray: 1994, The Bell Curve, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Hull D.: 1978, 'A Matter of Individuality', Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.Google Scholar
  19. Kitcher P.: 1985, Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Kitcher P.: 1985/2003, 'Darwin's Achievement' (originally published in 1985, but most readily accessible as Chapter 3 of Kitcher 2003).Google Scholar
  21. Kitcher P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Kitcher P.: 2000, 'Battling the Undead: How (and How Not) to Resist Genetic Determinism' (most readily accessible as Chapter 13 of Kitcher 2003).Google Scholar
  23. Kitcher P.: 2003, In Mendel's Mirror, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Lloyd E.A.: 1983, 'The Nature of Darwin's Support for the Theory of Natural Selection', Philosophy of Science 50, 112–129.Google Scholar
  25. Lloyd E.A.: 1988, The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory, Greenwood, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  26. Maynard S.J.: 1982, Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Mayr E.: 1983, 'How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Program', American Naturalist 121, 324–333.Google Scholar
  28. Michael J.S.: 1988, 'A New Look at Morton's Craniological Research', Current Anthropology 29, 349–354.Google Scholar
  29. Oyama S.: 1985, The Ontogeny of Information, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Sesardic N.: 2000, 'Philosophy of Science that Ignores Science: Race IQ and Heritability', Philosophy of Science 67, 580–602.Google Scholar
  31. Sesardic N.: 2003, 'Review of Naomi Zack Philosophy of Science and Race', Philosophy of Science 70, 447–449.Google Scholar
  32. Sober E. and Wilson D.S.: 1998, Unto Others, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  33. Sterelny K. and Kitcher P.: 1988, 'The Return of the Gene', Journal of Philosophy 85, 335–358.Google Scholar
  34. Templeton A.: 1982, 'Adaptation and the Integration of Evolutionary Forces', in Milkman R. (ed.), Perspectives on Evolution, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson P.: 1988, The Structure of Biological Theories, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Thornhill R. and Palmer C.: 2000, A Natural History of Rape, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Vickers A.L. and Kitcher P.: 2003, 'Pop Sociobiology Reborn: The Evolutionary Psychology of Sex and Violence', in Cheryl Travis (ed.), Evolution, Gender, and Rape, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; also in Kitcher 2003.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson E.O.: 1975, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Kitcher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations