Biologia Plantarum

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 535–540

Physiological Effects of Plant Hormones in Cotton Under Drought

  • D.M. Pandey
  • C.L. Goswami
  • B. Kumar
Article

Abstract

Effects of plant hormones indole-3-yl-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA), benzylaminopurine (BAP), abscisic acid (ABA) and ethrel (ETH) in 5 μM concentration on gas exchange, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBPCO, EC 4.1.1.39) activity, pigment content and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. H-777) under drought were studied. At reproductive stage (55 – 60 d after sowing) these hormones were sprayed on shoots one day prior to stress imposition by withholding irrigation. The soil moisture of control plants was kept at field capacity. Net photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), carboxylation efficiency (CE), water use efficiency (WUE), RuBPCO activity, boll number per plant, seed number per plant and lint mass per plant significantly decreased at drought while chlorophyll (Chl) b content and flower number per plant increased. ABA and ETH significantly reduced gas exchange parameters, Chl a and Chl b content. Detrimental drought effect on PN, gs, E, CE, RuBPCO and lint mass per plant was significantly alleviated by BAP and also its effect on seed number and lint mass per plant was significantly alleviated with the ABA treatment.

abscisic acid benzylaminopurine chlorophyll ethrel gas exchange gibberellic acid Gossypium hirsutum indole-3-yl-acetic acid ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase water use efficiency yield 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagga, A.K., Bela, M., Tomar. O.P.S.: Effect of fluctuating moisture conditions on growth, yield and nitrogen status of two mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties.-Indian J. Plant Physiol. 28: 395–406, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. Baskakov, Y.A.: [A new antistress preparation with cytokinin type activity.].-Agrokhimiya 4: 103–105, 1988. [In Russ.] Berkowitz, G.A., Wahlen, C.: Leaf K+ interaction with water stress inhibition of non-stomatal controlled photosynthesis.-Plant Physiol. 79: 189–193, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. Bharadwaj, S.N., Warrier, A., Singh, K.P.: Effect of water stress on grain weight in bread wheat.-Indian J. Plant Physiol. 30: 423–435, 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Bjorkman, O.: Carboxydismutase activity in shade-adapted species in higher plants.-Physiol. Plant. 2: 1–10, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. Brey. G.A.: A simple efficient liquid scintillation for counting aqous solutions in liquid scintillation counter.-Anal. Biochem. 1: 279–285, 1960.Google Scholar
  6. Cadena. J., Cothren. J.T.: Carbon balance for PGR-IV treated cotton plants grown under two irrigation regimes.–In: Dugger. P., Richter, D. (ed.): Proceedings of Beltwille Cotton Production Research Conference. Pp. 1225–1232. National Cotton Council of America, Nashville 1996.Google Scholar
  7. Chernyad'ev, 1.I.: Effect of 6-benzylaminopurine and thidiazuron on photosynthesis in crop plants.-Photosynthetica 30: 287–292, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. Chernayad'ev, 1.I.: [Plant photosynthesis under water stress and protective effect of cytokinin.]-Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol. 33: 5–17, 1997. [In Russ.].Google Scholar
  9. Chernayad'ev, I.I., Monakhova, O.F.: The activity and content of ribulaose-I,-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in wheat plants as affected by water stress and kartolin-4.-Photosynthetica 35: 603–610, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Dayal, J., Nandwal, A.S., Kaur, J.: Gas exchange and water relation studies in cycocel treated pigeon pea in response to water stress.-Indian J. Plant Physiol. 36: 263–265. 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Doushkova. P., Kouzmanov, N., Ninova, D., Kostova, T., Paskov, I.: Effect of 6-benzylaminopurine on photosynthetic activities and pigment contents of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-treated sunflower plants.-Photosynthetica 23: 390–394, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Downton, W.J.S., Lovey, BR., Grant, W.J.R.: Non uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress cause putative nonstomatal inhibition of photosynthesis.-New Phytol. 110: 503–509, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. Ephrath, J.E., Morani, A., Brudo, B.A.: Effect of moisture stress on stomatal resistance and photosynthetic rate in cotton (Gossypium hirsuturn) I. Controlled levels of stress.-Field Crops Res. 23: 117–131, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. Faver, K.L., Gerik, T.J., Thaxton, P.M.: Late season water stress in cotton. I1. Leaf gas exchange and assimilation capacity.-Crop Sci. 36: 922–928, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. Gadallah, M.A.A.: Effects of water stress, abscisic acid and proline on cotton plants.-J. arid Environ. 30: 315–325, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. Guinn, G., Mauney, J.R.: Fruiting of cotton. II. Effects of plant moisture status and active boll load on boll retention.-Agron. J. 76: 94–96, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. Hiscox, J.D., Israelstam, G.F.: A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration.-Can. J. Bot. 57: 1332–1334, 1979.Google Scholar
  18. lersel, M.W., Oosterhuis, D.M., Van-Iersel, M.W.: Drought effect on water relation of cotton fruits, bracts and leaves during ontogeny.-Environ. exp. Bot. 36: 54–59. 1996.Google Scholar
  19. Kicheva, M.I., Tsonev. T.D., Popova, I.P.: Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to photosynthesis in two wheat cultivars subjected to water stress.-Photosynthetica 30: 107–116, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Krieg. D.R., Hatfield, L., Gertysis, A.C., Staggenborg, S.A.: Plant monitoring: Water stress and Nwater management.–In: Proceedings of Beltwill Cotton Production Research Conference. Pp. 1191–1193. National Cotton Council of America, Nashville 1993.Google Scholar
  21. Kumar, B., Pandey, D.M., Goswami, C.L., Jain, S.: Effect of growth regulators on photosynthesis. transpiration and related parameters in water stressed cotton.-Biol. Plant. 44: 475–478, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Leidi, E.O., Lopez, M., Gorham. J., Gutierreg, G.C.L.: Variation in carbon isotope discrimination and other traits related to drought tolerance in upland cotton cultivars under dryland conditions.-Field Crops Res. 61: 109–123, 1999.Google Scholar
  23. Livington, S.D., Parkar, R.D., Landivar, J.A.: An evolution of urea and PGR-IV for maintaining yield potential of cotton subjected to water damage or nitrogen uptake deficiencies.-In: Proceedings of Beltwill Cotton Production Research Conference. Pp. 1342–1343. National Cotton Council of America, Nashville 1993.Google Scholar
  24. Marur, C.J.: Comparison of net photosynthetic rate, stomatal resistance and yield of two cotton cultivars under stress.-Pesq. agropec. bras. 26: 153–161, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. Matthews, M.A., Boyer, J.S.: Acclimation of photosynthesis to leaf water potential.-Plant Physiol. 74: 161–166, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. Mc Michael, B.L. Hesketh, J.D.: Field investigations of the response of cotton to water deficit.-Field Crops Res. 5: 319–333, 1982.Google Scholar
  27. Nilsen, E.T., Orcutte, D.M.: Phytohormones and plant responses to stress.–In: Nilsen, E.T., Orcutte, D.M. (ed.): Physiology of Plant under Stress: Abiotic Factors. Pp. 183–198. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1996.Google Scholar
  28. Pandey, D.M., Goswami, C.L., Kumar, B., Jain, S.: Hormonal regulation of photosynthetic enzymes in cotton under water stress.-Photosynthetica 38: 403–407, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Pandey, P.K., Herrera. W.A.T., Pendleton, J.W.: Drought response of grain legumes under irrigation gradient.-Agron. J. 76: 549–560. 1984.Google Scholar
  30. Samlev, K.S., Martin, K.G.: [The ultrastructure of chloroplasts of cotton under water deficit].-Fiziol. Biokhim. kul't. Rast. 14: 346–349. 1982. [In Russ.]Google Scholar
  31. Van Rensburg, L., Kruger, G.H.J.: Comparative analysis of differential drought stress induced suppression of and recovery in carbon dioxide fixation: Stomatal and non stomatal limitation in Nicotiana tabacum.- J. Plant Physiol. 142: 296–306, 1993.Google Scholar
  32. Zhao, D., Oosterhuis, D.M., Zhao, D.L.: Physiological responses of growth chamber grown cotton plants to the plant growth regulator PGR-IV under water deficit stress.-Environ. exp. Bot. 38: 7–14, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • D.M. Pandey
    • 1
  • C.L. Goswami
    • 1
  • B. Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant PhysiologyChaudhary Charan Singh, Haryana Agriculture UniversityHisar-India

Personalised recommendations