, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 341–362 | Cite as

Effect of microrelief and vegetation on methane emission from wet polygonal tundra, Lena Delta, Northern Siberia

  • Lars Kutzbach
  • Dirk Wagner
  • Eva-Maria Pfeiffer


The effect of microrelief and vegetation on methane (CH4) emission was investigated in a wet polygonal tundra of the Lena Delta, Northern Siberia (72.37N, 126.47E). Total and plant-mediated CH4 fluxes were measured by closed-chamber techniques at two typical sites within a low-centred polygon. During the study period, total CH4 flux averaged 28.0 ± 5.4 mg m−2 d−1 in the depressed polygon centre and only 4.3 ± 0.8 mg m−2 d−1 at the elevated polygon rim. This substantial small-scale spatial variability of CH4 emission was caused by strong differences of hydrologic conditions within the microrelief of the polygon, which affected aeration status and organic matter content of the soils as well as the vegetation cover. Beside water table position, the vegetation cover was a major factor controlling CH4 emission from polygonal tundra. It was shown that the dominant vascular plant of the study area, Carex aquatilis, possesses large aerenchyma, which serve as pathways for substantial plant-mediated CH4 transport. The importance of plant-mediated CH4 flux was strongly influenced by the position of the water table relative to the main root horizon. Plant-mediated CH4 transport accounted for about two-thirds of the total flux in the wet polygon centre and for less than one-third of the total flux at the moist polygon rim. A clipping experiment and microscopic-anatomical studies suggested that plant-mediated CH4 transport via C. aquatilis plants is driven only by diffusion and is limited by the high diffusion resistance of the dense root exodermes.

Aerenchyma Carex aquatilis Methane emission Microrelief Plant-mediated gas transport Polygonal tundra 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong W. 1979. Aeration in higher plants. In: Woolhouse H.W. (ed) Advances in Botanical Research. Academic Press, New York, pp. 226–333.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong J., Armstrong W., Beckett P.M., Halder J.E., Lythe S., Holt R. and Sinclair A. 1996. Pathways of aeration and the mechanisms and beneficial effects of humidity – and Venturi-induced convections in Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Aquat. Bot. 54: 177–197.Google Scholar
  3. Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Springer, Wien.Google Scholar
  4. Cao M., Marshall S. and Gregson K. 1996. Global carbon exchange and methane emissions from natural wetlands: application of a process-based model. J. Geophys. Res. 101(D9): 14399–14414.Google Scholar
  5. Chanton J.P. and Dacey J.W.H. 1991. Effects of vegetation on methane flux, reservoirs, and carbon isotopic composition. In: Sharkey T.D., Holland E.A. and Mooney H.A. (eds) Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 65–89.Google Scholar
  6. Chernov Y.I. and Matveyeva N.V. 1997. Arctic ecosystems in Russia. In: Wielgolaski F.E. (ed) Polar and Alpine Tundra – Ecosystems of the World 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 361–507.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen T.R. 1993. Methane emission from arctic tundra. Biogeochemistry 21: 117–139.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen T.R., Jonason S., Callaghan T.V. and Havström M. 1995. Spatial variation in high-latitude methane flux along a transect across Siberian and European tundra environments. J. Geophys. Res. 100(D10): 21035–21045.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen T.R., Lloyd D., Svensson B., Martikainen P., Harding R., Oskarsson H., Friborg T., Søgaard H. and Panikov N. 2001. Biogenic controls on trace gas fluxes in northern wetlands. IGBP-Global Change NewsLetter 51: 9–15.Google Scholar
  10. Dunfield P., Knowles R., Dumont R. and Moore T.R. 1993. Methane production and consumption in temperate and subarctic peat soils: response to temperature an pH. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25(3): 321–326.Google Scholar
  11. Elovskaya L.G. 1987. Classification and diagnostics of Yakutian permafrost soils. Yakutian Section of the Siberian Branch of the Academy of Science USSR, Yakutsk.Google Scholar
  12. French H.M. 1996. The Periglacial Environment. Longman Singapore Publishers, Singapore.Google Scholar
  13. Große W., Büchel H.B. and Tiebel H. 1991. Pressurized ventilation in wetland plants. Aquat. Bot. 39: 89–98.Google Scholar
  14. Grünfeld S. and Brix H. 1999. Methanogenesis and methane emissions: effects of water table, substrate type and presence of Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 64: 63–75.Google Scholar
  15. Harriss R.C., Bartlett K., Frolking S. and Crill P. 1993. Methane emissions from northern high-latitude wetlands. In: Oremland R.S. (ed) Biogeochemistry of Global Change: Radiaoactively Active Trace Gases. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 449–485.Google Scholar
  16. Heyer J. and Suckow R. 1985. Ökologische Untersuchungen der Methanoxydation in einem sauren Moorsee. Limnologica 16(2): 247–266.Google Scholar
  17. Holzapfel-Pschorn A., Conrad R. and Seiler W. 1986. Production, oxidation and emission of methane in rice paddies. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 31: 343–351.Google Scholar
  18. Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Joabsson A., Christensen T.R. and Wallén B. 1999. Influence of vascular plant photosynthetic rate on CH4 emission from peat monoliths from southern boreal Sweden. Polar Res. 18: 215–220.Google Scholar
  20. Kelker D. and Chanton J. 1997. The effect of clipping on methane emissions from Carex. Biogeochemistry 39: 37–44.Google Scholar
  21. King G.M. and Adamsen A.P.S. 1992. Effects of temperature on methane consumption in a forest soil and in pure cultures of the methanotroph Methylomonas rubra. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 58(9): 2758–2763.Google Scholar
  22. King J.Y., Reeburgh W.S. and Regli S.K. 1998. Methane emission and transport by arctic sedges in Alaska: results of a vegetation removal experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 103(D22): 29083–29092.Google Scholar
  23. Kon?alová H. 1990. Anatomical adaptations to waterlogging in roots of wetland graminoids: limitations and drawbacks. Aquat. Bot. 38: 127–134.Google Scholar
  24. Matveyeva N.V. 1994. Floristic classification and ecology of tundra vegetation of the Taymyr Peninsula, northern Siberia. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 813–828.Google Scholar
  25. Maxwell B. 1997. Recent climate patterns in the Arctic. In: Oechel W.C., Callaghan T., Gilmanov T., Holten J.I., Maxwell B., Molau U. and Sveinbjö msson B. (eds) Global Change and Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystems. Springer, New York, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
  26. Moore T.R. and Roulet N.T. 1993. Methane flux: water table relations in northern wetlands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20: 587–590.Google Scholar
  27. Moosavi S.C. and Crill P.M. 1998. CH4 oxidation by tundra wetlands as measured by a selective inhibitor technique. J. Geophys. Res. 103(D22): 29093–29106.Google Scholar
  28. Morrissey L.A. and Livingston G.P. 1992. Methane emissions from Alaska arctic tundra: an assessment of local spatial variability. J. Geophys. Res. 97: 16661–16670.Google Scholar
  29. Morrissey L.A., Zobel D.B., Livingston G.B. 1993. Significance of stomatal control on methane release from Carex dominated wetlands. Chemosphere 26(1–4): 339–355.Google Scholar
  30. Müller K. 1997. Patterned ground and properties of permafrost soils of the Northsiberian Lena Delta. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 160: 497–503.Google Scholar
  31. Nakano T., Kuniyoshi S. and Fukuda M. 2000. Temporal variation in methane emission from tundra wetlands in a permafrost area, northeastern Siberia. Atmos. Environ. 34: 1205–1213.Google Scholar
  32. Nykänen H., Alm J., Silvola J., Tolonen K. and Martikainen P.J. 1998. Methane fluxes on boreal peatlands of different fertility and the effect of long-term experimental lowering of the water table on flux rates. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 12: 53–69.Google Scholar
  33. Panikov N.S., Belyaev A.S., Semenov A.M., Zelenev V.V. 1993. Methane production and uptake in some terrestrial ecosystems of the former USSR. In: Oremland R.S. (ed) Biogeochemistry of Global Change: Radioactively Active Trace Gases. Chapmann and Hall, New York, pp. 221–244.Google Scholar
  34. Popp T.J., Chanton J.P., Whiting G.J. and Grant N. 2000. Evaluation of methane oxidation in the rhizosphere of a Carex dominated fen in north central Alberta, Canada. Biogeochemistry 51: 259–281.Google Scholar
  35. Rachold V. and Grigoriev M.N. (eds) 2000. Russian–German Cooperation SYSTEM LAPTEV SEA 2000: The Expedition LENA 1999. Reports on Polar Research 354: 1–269.Google Scholar
  36. Roulet N.T., Jano A., Kelly C.A., Klinger L.F., Moore T.R., Protz R., Ritter J.A. and Rouse W.R. 1994. Role of the Hudson bay lowland as a source of atmospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. 99(D1): 1435–1454.Google Scholar
  37. Roura-Carol M. and Freeman C. 1999. Methane release from peat soils: effects of Sphagnum and Juncus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 323–325.Google Scholar
  38. Samarkin V.A., Gundelwein A. and Pfeiffer E.-M. 1999. Studies of methane production and emission in relation to the microrelief of a polygonal tundra in northern Siberia. In: Kassens H., Bauch H.A., Dmitrenko I.A. et-al (eds) Land–Ocean Systems in the Siberian Arctic, Dynamics and History.-Springer, Berlin, pp. 329–342.Google Scholar
  39. Schachtschabel P., Blume H.-P., Brümmer, Hartge K.-H. and Schwertmann U. 1998. Scheffer/Schachtschabel – Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  40. Schlichting E., Blume H.P. and Stahr K. 1995. Bodenkundliches Praktikum – Pareys Studientexte 81. Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  41. Schoeneberger P.J., Wysocki D.A., Benham E.C. and Broderson W.D. 1998. Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils. Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  42. Schütz H., Schröder P. and Rennenberg H. 1991. Role of plants in regulating the methane flux to the atmosphere. In: Sharkey T.D., Holland E.A. and Mooney H.A. (eds) Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 29–63.Google Scholar
  43. Sebacher D.J., Harriss R.C. and Bartlett K.B. 1985. Methane emissions to the atmosphere through aquatic plants. J. Environ. Qual. 14: 39–46.Google Scholar
  44. Seibt A., Hoth P. and Naumann D. 2000. Gas solubility in formation waters of the North German Basin – implications for geothermal energy recovery. In: Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan, 28 May – 10 June 2000. International Geothermal Association IGA, Pisa, Italy, pp. 1713–1718.Google Scholar
  45. Schimel J.P. 1995. Plant transport and methane production as controls on methane flux from arctic wet meadow tundra. Biogeochemistry 28: 183–200.Google Scholar
  46. Soil Survey Staff, Soil Conservation Service, USDA 1998. Keys to Soil Taxonomy 8th edn. Pocahontas, Blacksburg, Virginia.Google Scholar
  47. Sorrel B.K. and Boon P.I. 1994. Convective gas flow in Eleocharis sphacelata R.Br.: methane transport and release from wetlands. Aquat. Bot. 47: 197–212.Google Scholar
  48. Svensson B.H. and Rosswall T. 1984. In situ methane production from acid peat in plant communities with different moisture regimes in a subarctic mire. Oikos 43: 341–350.Google Scholar
  49. Thomas K.L., Benstead J., Davies K.L. and Lloyd D. 1996. Role of wetland plants in the diurnal control of CH4 and CO2 fluxes in peat. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28: 17–23.Google Scholar
  50. Tsuyuzaki S., Nakano T., Kuniyoshi S. and Fukuda M. 2001. Methane flux in grassy marshlands near Kolyma River, north-eastern Siberia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33: 1419–1423.Google Scholar
  51. Torn M.S. and Chapin F.S. 1993. Environmental and biotic controls over methane flux from arctic tundra. Chemosphere 26: 357–368.Google Scholar
  52. Tornbjerg T., Bendix M. and Brix H. 1994. Internal gas transport in Typha latifolia L. and Typha angustifolia L. 2. Convective throughflow pathways and ecological significance. Aquat. Bot. 49: 91–105.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Nat F.-J.W.A. and Middelburg J.J. 1998. Seasonal variation in methane oxidation by the rhizosphere of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris. Aquat. Bot. 61(2): 95–110.Google Scholar
  54. Waddington J.M., Roulet N.T. and Swanson R.V. 1996. Water table control of CH4 emission enhancement by vascular plants in boreal peatlands. J. Geophys. Res. 101: 22775–22785.Google Scholar
  55. Wagner D., Kobabe S., Pfeiffer E.-M. and Hubberten H.-W. 2003. Microbial controls on methane fluxes from a polygonal tundra of the Lena Delta, Siberia. Permafrost Periglacial Processes 14: 173–185.Google Scholar
  56. Whalen S.C. and Reeburgh W.S. 1992. Interannual variations in tundra methane emission: a 4-year time series at fixed sites. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 139–159.Google Scholar
  57. Whalen S.C., Reeburgh W.S. and Reimers C.E. 1996. Control of tundra methane emission by microbial oxidation. In: Reynolds J.F. and Tenhunen J.D. (eds) Landscape Function and Disturbance in Arctic Tundra, Ecological Studies 120. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
  58. Whiting G.J. and Chanton J.P. 1992. Plant-dependent CH4-emission in a subarctic Canadian fen. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 9: 225–231.Google Scholar
  59. Yamamoto S., Alcauskas J.B. and Crozier T.E. 1976. Solubility of methane in distilled water and seawater. J. Chem. Eng. Data 21(1): 78–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Kutzbach
  • Dirk Wagner
  • Eva-Maria Pfeiffer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations