Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 13, pp 2485–2509 | Cite as

Soil seed bank composition and diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest

  • Guillaume Decocq
  • Bertille Valentin
  • Benoit Toussaint
  • Frédéric Hendoux
  • Robert Saguez
  • Jacques Bardat


Little is known about the influence of forest management on the interaction between seed bank and aboveground vegetation. We surveyed seed banks and vegetation in 10 forest stands under similar abiotic conditions but submitted either to a coppice-with-standards treatment (n = 5) or to a selective-cutting system (n = 5). We analyzed species composition and diversity, community ecological profile, and distribution of taxa among different life forms, strategy, morphology and functional type categories. A total of 2085 seedlings (8296 seeds m−2) germinated-corresponding to 28 species, among which Juncus effusus was the most abundant. Fifty-seven percent of the species were also recorded in the aboveground vegetation, the dominant species being Rubus fruticosus agg., but only 28% of the aboveground species were present in the seed bank. Our results suggest that (1) vernal geophytes and shade-tolerant perennials, which group most true forest species, are not incorporated in the seed bank, (2) parent plants of most seeds were present either in the stand in an earlier dynamic stage or apart from the stand and long-distance dispersed, (3) as expected, early-successional species are well represented in the seed bank, (4) forestry vehicles seem to be a major means of dispersion for stress-tolerant species normally found in forest lanes and wheel tracks. We conclude that seed banks contain species that have a potentially negative impact on the true forest flora and, thus, forest management should minimize soil disturbance and retain remnants of old-coppice woods to conserve disturbance-sensitive true forest species.

Agestochory Disturbance regime Forest management Seed bank Seed dispersal Spatial variation Succession Temperate deciduous forest 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnould P., Hotyat M. and Simon L. 1997. Les forêts d'Europe. Nathan, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  2. Aude E. and Lawesson J.E. 1998. Vegetation in Danish beech forests: the importance of soil, microclimate and management factors, evaluated by variation partitioning. Plant Ecology 134: 53–65.Google Scholar
  3. Augusto L., Dupouey J.L., Picard J.F. and Ranger J. 2001. Potential contribution of the seed bank in coniferous plantations to the restoration of native deciduous forest vegetation. Acta Oecologica 22: 87–98.Google Scholar
  4. Barkman J.J. 1988. New systems of plant growth forms and phenological plant types. In: Werger M.J.A., van der Aart P.J.M., During H.J. and Verhoeven J.T.A. (eds) Plant Form and Vegetation Structure. SPB Academy Publications The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 9–44.Google Scholar
  5. Beatty S.W. 1991. Colonization dynamics in a mosaic landscape: the buried seed pool. Journal of Biogeography 18: 553–563.Google Scholar
  6. Bekker R.M., Bakker J.P., Grandin U., Kalamees R., Milberg P., Poschlod P. et al. 1998. Seed size, shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity. Functional Ecology 12: 834–842.Google Scholar
  7. Bossuyt B. and Hermy H. 2001. Influence of land use history on seed banks in European temperate forest ecosystems: a review. Ecography 24: 225–238.Google Scholar
  8. Bossuyt B., Heyn M. and Hermy M. 2002. Seed bank and vegetation composition of forest stands of varying age in central Belgium: consequences for regeneration of ancient forest vegetation. Plant Ecology 162: 33–48.Google Scholar
  9. Brown J.H. 1981. Two decades of homage to Santa Rosalia: toward a general theory of diversity. The American Zoologist 21: 877–888.Google Scholar
  10. Brown D. 1992. Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1603–1612.Google Scholar
  11. Brown S.C. 1998. Remnant seed banks and vegetation as predictors of restored marsh vegetation. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 620–629.Google Scholar
  12. Brown A.H.F. and Oosterhuis L. 1981. The role of buried seed in coppicewoods. Biological Conservation 21: 19–38.Google Scholar
  13. Buckley G.P., Howell R. and Anderson M.A. 1997. Vegetation succession following ride edge management in lowland plantations and woods. II. The seed bank resource. Biological Conservation 82: 305–316.Google Scholar
  14. Busing R.T., Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Ecology of Pacific Yew(Taxus brevifolia) in western Oregon and Washington. Conservation Biology 9: 1199–1207.Google Scholar
  15. Chambers J.C. and McMahon J.A. 1994. A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 263–292.Google Scholar
  16. Decocq G. 1997. Contribution à l'étude phytosociologique de l'actuelle Theoracia sylva (Thiérache, Aisne, France). Essai d'analyse systémique des phénomènes phytodynamiques. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France.Google Scholar
  17. Decocq G. 1998. Données phytosociologiques récentes sur les forêts de la Thiérache (Aisne, France). I-Les forêts mésophiles de la Thiérache argilo-calcaire. Acta Botanica Gallica 145: 125–147.Google Scholar
  18. Decocq G., Aubert M., Dupont F., Alard D., Saguez R., Wattez-Franger A. et al. Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understory response to two silvicultural systems. Journal of Applied Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  19. DeFerrari C.M. and Naiman R.J. 1994. A multi-scale assessment of the occurrence of exotic plants on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 247–258.Google Scholar
  20. Dougall T.A.G. and Dodd J.C. 1997. A study of species richness and diversity in seed banks and its use for the environmental mitigation of a proposed holiday village development in a coniferized woodland in south east England. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 1413–1428.Google Scholar
  21. Dubois J.J. 1996. Espaces et paysages forestiers du nordouest de la France du XIIe au XVIIIe siècles: l'apport de la biogéographie historique. In: L'uomo e la foresta, Instituto F. Datini, Prato, Italy, pp. 253–296.Google Scholar
  22. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W. and Paulissen D. 1991. Zeigerwerte von Planzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1–258.Google Scholar
  23. Eriksson O. 1995. Seedling recruitment in deciduous forest herbs: the effect of litter, soil chemistry and seed bank. Flora 190: 65–70.Google Scholar
  24. Eriksson O. and Ehrlén J. 1992. Seed and microsite limitation of recruitment in plant populations. Oecologia 91: 360–364.Google Scholar
  25. Falinska K. 1999. Seed bank dynamics in abandoned meadows during a 20-year period in the Bialowieza National Park. Journal of Ecology 87: 461–475.Google Scholar
  26. Grime J.P. 1989. Seed banks in ecological perspective. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L. (eds) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
  27. Grime J., Hodgson J.G. and Hunt R. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology, a Functional Approach to Common British Species. Unwin Hyman Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  28. Halpern C.B. and Spies T.A. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 914–934.Google Scholar
  29. Halpern C.B., Evans S.A. and Nielson S. 1999. Soil seed banks in young closed-canopy forests of the Olympic Peninsula, Washington: potential contributions to understory reinitiation. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 922–935.Google Scholar
  30. Hermy M. 1994. Effects of former land use on plant species diversity and pattern in European deciduous woodlands. In: Boyle T.J.B. and Boyle C.E.B. (eds) Biodiversity, Temperate Ecosystems and Global Change. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 123–144.Google Scholar
  31. Hermy M., Honnay O., Firbank L., Grashof-Bokdom C. and Lawesson J.E. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biological Conservation 91: 9–22.Google Scholar
  32. Holderegger R. 1996. Effects of litter removal on the germination of Anemone nemorosa L. Flora 191: 175–178.Google Scholar
  33. Hyatt L.A. 1999. Differences between seed bank composition and field recruitment in a temperate zone deciduous forest. America Midland Naturalist 142: 31–38.Google Scholar
  34. Ingersoll C.A. and Wilson M.V. 1989. Buried propagules in an old-growth forest and their response to experimental disturbances. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 1156–1162.Google Scholar
  35. Jankowska-Blaszczuk M. 1998. Variability of the soil seed banks in the natural deciduous forest in the Bialowieza National Park. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 67: 313–324.Google Scholar
  36. Kalamees R. and Zobel M. 1998. Soil seed bank composition in different successional stages of a species rich wooded meadow in Laelatu, western Estonia. Acta Oecologica 19: 175–180.Google Scholar
  37. Kirby K.J. and Watkins C. 1998. The Ecological History of European Forests. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Kjelsson G. 1992. Seed banks in Danish deciduous forests: species composition, seed influx and distribution pattern in soil. Ecography 15: 86–100.Google Scholar
  39. Lambinon J., De Langhe J.E., Delvosalle L. and Duvigneaud J. 1992. Nouvelle flore de la Belgique, du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, du Nord de la France et des régions voisines. 4th edn. Editions du Patrimoine du Jardin botanique national de Belgique, Meise, Belgium.Google Scholar
  40. Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L. 1989. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  41. Leckie S., Vellend M., Bell G., Waterway M.J. and Lechowicz M.J. 2000. The seed bank in an old-growth, temperate deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 78: 181–192.Google Scholar
  42. Major J. and Pyott W.T. 1966. Buried viable seeds in two California bushgrass sites and their bearing on the definition of a flora. Vegetatio 13: 253–282.Google Scholar
  43. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209–220.Google Scholar
  44. McCune B. and Mefford M.J. 1997. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 3.0. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.Google Scholar
  45. Milberg P. 1995. Soil seed bank after eighteen years of succession from grassland to forest. Oikos 72: 3–13.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell R.J., Marrs R.H. and Auld M.H.D. 1998. A comparative study of the seed banks of heathland and successional habitats in Dorset, southern England. Journal of Ecology 86: 588–596.Google Scholar
  47. Mladenoff D.J. 1990. The relationship of the soil seed bank and understory vegetation in old-growth northern hardwood–hemlock trefall gaps. Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 2714–2721.Google Scholar
  48. Nakagoshi N. 1985. Buried viable seeds in temperate forests. In: White J. (ed) The Population Structure of Vegetation. Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 551–570.Google Scholar
  49. Peterson C.J. and Carson W.P. 1996. Generalizing forest regeneration models: the dependence of propagule availability on disturbance history and stand size. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 45–52.Google Scholar
  50. Petrov V.V. and Palkina T.A. 1983. The content of dormant viable seeds in the soil of a broad-leaved forest and a spruce plantation. Vestnik Moskovkogo Universiteta, Biologya 38: 31–35.Google Scholar
  51. Pickett S.T.A. and McDonnell M.J. 1989. Seed bank dynamics in temperate deciduous forest. In: Leck M.A., Parker V.T. and Simpson R.L. (eds) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, Inc., London, pp. 123–145.Google Scholar
  52. Picket S.T.A. and White P. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  53. Qi M. and Scarrat J.B. 1998. Effect of harvesting method on seed bank dynamics in a boreal mixedwood forest in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 872–883.Google Scholar
  54. Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  55. Roberts H.A. 1981. Seed banks in soils. Advances in Applied Biology 6: 1–55.Google Scholar
  56. Rogers R.S. 1982. Early spring herb communities in mesophytic forests of the Great lakes region. Ecology 63: 1050–1063.Google Scholar
  57. Sager S. and Rocco T. 1992. StatView. Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  58. Schiffman P.M. and Johnson W.C. 1992. Sparse buried seed bank in a southern Appalachian oak forest: implications for succession. The American Midland Naturalist 127: 258–267.Google Scholar
  59. Staaf H., Jonsson M. and Olsén L.G. 1987. Buried germinative seeds in mature beech forests with different herbaceous vegetation and soil types. Holarctic Ecology 10: 268–277.Google Scholar
  60. Thompson K. and Grime J.P. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology 67: 893–921.Google Scholar
  61. Thompson K., Bakker J. and Bekker R.M. 1997. The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  62. Vanesse R. 1977. Un exemple d'analyse du stock grainier dans un sol forestier. In: Actes du Vème colloque international sur la biologie et l'écologie des mauvaises herbes. Dijon, France, pp. 141–147.Google Scholar
  63. Volpers T. 1989. Changes in microclimate and vegetation after thinning in a montane virgin forest. Phytocoenologia 17: 71–104.Google Scholar
  64. Warr J.S., Kent M. and Thompson K. 1994. Seed bank composition and variability in five woodlands in southwest England. Journal of Biogeography 21: 151–168.Google Scholar
  65. Whipple S.A. 1978. The relationship of buried, germinating seeds to vegetation in an old-growth Colorado subalpine forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 56: 1505–1509.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson S.D., Moore D.R.J. and Keddy P.A. 1993. Relationships of marsh seed banks to vegetation patterns along environmental gradients. Freshwater Biology 29: 361–370.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume Decocq
    • 1
  • Bertille Valentin
    • 2
  • Benoit Toussaint
    • 2
  • Frédéric Hendoux
    • 2
  • Robert Saguez
    • 1
  • Jacques Bardat
    • 3
  1. 1.Département de BotaniqueUniversité de Picardie Jules VerneAmiens CedexFrance
  2. 2.Centre régional de Phytosociologie/Conservatoire Botanique National de BailleulBailleulFrance
  3. 3.Institut d'Ecologie et de Gestion de la Biodiversité, Service du Patrimoine naturelMuséum National d'Histoire NaturelleParis Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations