Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 12, pp 2381–2385 | Cite as

Silvicultural intensification for tropical forest conservation: a response to Fredericksen and Putz

  • Plinio Sist
  • Nick Brown


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aubréville A. 1938. La forêt coloniale: les forêt de l 'Afrique occidentale francaise. Annales Academie des Sciences Coloniale, Paris 9: 1–245.Google Scholar
  2. Britwum S.P.K. 1976. Natural and artificial regeneration practices in the high forest of Ghana. Ghana Forestry Journal 2: 45–49.Google Scholar
  3. Brokaw N.V.L. 1985. Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology 66: 682–687.Google Scholar
  4. Brokaw N.V.L. and Walker L.R. 1991. Summary of the effects of Caribbean hurricanes on vegetation. Biotropica 23: 442–447.Google Scholar
  5. Brown N., Jennings S. and Clements T. 2003. The ecology,silviculture and biogeography of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla ): a critical review of the evidence. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6: 37–49.Google Scholar
  6. Brown N.D. and Whitmore T.C. 1992. Do dipterocarp seedlings really partition tropical rain forest gaps? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 335: 369–378.Google Scholar
  7. Bruenig E.F. 1996. Conservation and Management of Tropical Rain Forest: An Integrated Approach to Sustainability. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Burslem D., Whitmore T.C. and Brown G.C. 2000. Short-term effects of cyclone impact and long-term recovery of tropical rain forest on Kolombangara, Solomon Islands. Journal of Ecology 88: 1063–1078.Google Scholar
  9. Dennis R. 1999. A review of fire projects in Indonesia (1982–1998). CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  10. Denslow J.S. 1980. Gap partitioning among tropical rain forest trees. Biotropica 12: 47–55.Google Scholar
  11. Fredericksen T.S. and Putz F.E. 2003. Silvicultural intensification for tropical forest conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 1445–1453.Google Scholar
  12. Grogan J., Barreto P. and Verissimo A. 2002. Mahogany in the Brazilian Amazon: Ecology and Perspectives on Management. Imazon, Belém, Pará, Brazil.Google Scholar
  13. Hall J.S., Medjibe V., Berlyn G.P. and Ashton P.M.S. 2003. Seedling growth of three co-occurring Entandrophragma species (Meliaceae) under simulated light environments: implications for forest management in central Africa.Forest Ecology and Management 179: 135–144.Google Scholar
  14. Jennings S.B., Brown N.D., Boshier D.H., Whitmore T.C. and Lopes J.d.C.A. 2001. Ecology provides a pragmatic solution to the maintenance of genetic diversity in sustainably managed tropical rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. Kyereh B., Swaine M.D. and Thompson J. 1999. Effect of light on the germination of forest trees in Ghana. Journal of Ecology 87: 772–783.Google Scholar
  16. Lancaster P.C. 1961. Experiments with natural regeneration in the Omo forest reserve. Nigerian Forestry Information Bulletin (n.s.)13: 5–16.Google Scholar
  17. Lowe R.G. 1978. Experience with the tropical shelterwood system of regeneration in natural forest in Nigeria. Forest Ecology and Management 1: 193–212.Google Scholar
  18. Morris M.H., Negreros-Castillo P. and Mize C. 2000. Sowing date,shade and irrigation affect big-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King). Forest Ecology and Management 132: 173–181.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson B.W., Kapos V., Adams J.B., Oliveira W.J., Braun O.P.G.and do Amaral I.L. 1994. Forest disturbance by large blowdowns in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecology 75: 853–858.Google Scholar
  20. Nicholson D.I. 1960. Light requirements of seedlings of five species of Dipterocarpaceae. Malaysian Forester 23: 344–356.Google Scholar
  21. Nussbaum R., Anderson J. and Spencer T. 1995. Factors limiting the growth of indigenous tree seedlings planted on degraded rain-forest soils in Sabah, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 74: 149–159.Google Scholar
  22. Sist P. 2000. Reduced-impact logging in the tropics: objectives,principles and impact of research. International Forestry Reviews 2: 3–10.Google Scholar
  23. Sist P. and Nguyen-Thé N. 2002. Logging damage and the subsequent dynamics of a dipterocarp forest in East Kalimantan (1990 –1996). Forest Ecology and Management 165: 85–103.Google Scholar
  24. Sist P., Sheil D., Kartawinata K. and Priyadi H. 2003. Reduced-impact logging in Indonesian Borneo: some results confirming the need for new silvicultural prescriptions. Forest Ecology and Management 179: 415–427.Google Scholar
  25. Sist P., Fimbel R., Nasi R., Sheil D. and Chevallier M-H. 2003b. Towards sustainable management of mixed dipterocarp forests of South East Asia: moving beyond minimum diameter cutting limits. Environmental Conservation 30: 364–374.Google Scholar
  26. Sist P., Picard N. and Gourlet-Fleury S. 2003c. Sustainable rotation length and yields in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of Borneo. Annals of Forest Science 60: 803–814.Google Scholar
  27. Tanner E.V.J., Kapos V. and Healey J.R. 1991. Hurricane effects on forest ecosystems in the Caribbean. Biotropica 23: 513–521.Google Scholar
  28. Whitmore T.C. 1989. Changes over 21 years in the Kolombangara rain forests. Journal of Ecology 77: 469–483.Google Scholar
  29. Whitmore T.C. and Burslem D.F.R.P. 1998. Major disturbances in tropical rainforests. In: Newbery D.M., Prins H.H.T.and Brown N. (eds), Dynamics of Tropical Communities. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, pp. 549–565.Google Scholar
  30. Wyatt-Smith J. 1988. Letter to the Editor. Forest Ecology and Management 24: 219–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Plinio Sist
    • 1
  • Nick Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Forestry Department of CIRADConvênio EMBRAPA-CIRADBelem-PABrazil
  2. 2.Oxford Forestry Institute, Department of Plant SciencesOxford UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations