Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 8, pp 1441–1451 | Cite as

Phenotypic variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces from north Shewa in Ethiopia

Article

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in a greenhouse to estimate the level of morphological variability within 44 barley landraces (14 farmers' cultivars and 30 accessions) from north Shewa in Ethiopia. Four qualitative traits (spike type, kernel color, caryopsis type and spike density) were recorded. Variation in spike type (two-rowed, irregular or six-rowed) was high in many landraces. Variability in spike type within landraces from Debre Libanose, Kuyu and Girar Jarso was high. The highest mean frequencies of the six-row type were recorded for Ankober-Mezezo (85%) and Kimbibit (80.9%). The two-row types were dominant in Wuchale (53.3%), while they were absent at the Ankober-Mezezo, Debre Libanose and Kimbibit localities. A larger proportion of the irregular types occurred in Debre Libanose (71.3%), followed by Kuyu (62.6%). Diversity for kernel color was generally low except in landraces from Kuyu, but it was very high among landraces. White kernel color was predominant. The mean diversity index pooled over characters ranged from 0.12 ± 0.08 to 0.57 ± 0.11, and 11 landraces had a mean diversity larger than 0.50. Differences among landraces within localities were mostly highly significant for all characters except that of caryopsis type (covered or naked). Landraces from Girar Jarso, Wuchale, and Kuyu in particular differed significantly in spike type and kernel color. Unlike farmers' cultivars, the accessions were found to be more variable in spike type and kernel color. Moreover, the mean diversity indices pooled over characters were relatively higher in the accessions than within farmers' cultivars.

Barley landraces Ethiopia Genetic variability North Shewa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afifi A.A. and Clark V. 1996. Computer Aided Multivariate Analysis. Text in Statistical Science. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  2. Ahokas H. and Poukkula M. 1999. Malting enzyme activities, grain protein variation and yield potentials in the displaced genetic resources of barley landraces from Finland. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46: 251–260.Google Scholar
  3. Asfaw Z. 1989. Relationship between spike morphology, hordeins and altitude within Ethiopian landrace populations of barley, Hordeum vulgare L. (Poaceae). Hereditas 110: 203–209.Google Scholar
  4. Demissie A. and Bjornstad A. 1996. Phenotypic diversity of Ethiopian barleys in relation to geographic regions, altitudinal range, and agro-ecological zones: as an aid to germplasm collection and conservation strategy. Hereditas 124: 17–29.Google Scholar
  5. Engels G.M.M. 1991. A diversity study in Ethiopian barley. In: Engels J.M.M., Hawkes J.G. and Melak Werede (eds) Plant Genetic Resources of Ethiopia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 130–138.Google Scholar
  6. Hintze J.L. 1998. NCSS 2000 Statistical System Users Guide.Google Scholar
  7. Jain S.K., Qualset C.O., Bhatt G.M. and Wu K.K. 1975. Geographical patterns of phenotypic diversity in a world collection of durum wheats. Crop Science 15: 700–704.Google Scholar
  8. Magdalena R., Varela F. and Carillo J.M. 1997. Analysis of the discriminating power of agro/morphological and biochemical descriptors in a sample of the Spanish collection of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44: 247–255.Google Scholar
  9. Negassa M. 1985. Patterns of phenotypic diversity in an Ethiopian barley collection and the Arusi-Bale highlands as a center of origin of barley. Hereditas 102: 139–150.Google Scholar
  10. Qualset C.O. 1975. Sampling germplasm in a center of diversity: an example of disease resistance in Ethiopian barley. In: Frankel O.H. and Hawkes J.G. (eds) Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
  11. Rasmusson D.C., McLean I. and Tew T.L. 1979. Vegetative and grain filling periods of growth in barley. Crop Science 19: 5–9.Google Scholar
  12. Ruiz M., Varela F. and Carrillo J.M. 1996. Analysis of the discriminating power of agro/morphological and biochemical descriptors in a sample of the Spanish collection of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44: 247–255.Google Scholar
  13. Snedecor G.W. 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  14. Upadhyaya H.D., Ortiz R., Bramel P.J. and Singh S. 2002. Phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic characters in chickpea core collection. Euphytica 123: 333–342.Google Scholar
  15. Van Beuningen B. and Bush R.H. 1997. Genetic diversity among North American spring wheat cultivars: III. Cluster analysis based on quantitative morphological traits. Crop Science 37: 981–988.Google Scholar
  16. Zewdie Y. and Zeven A.C. 1997. Variation in Yugoslavian hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) accessions. Euphytica 97: 81–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations