Advertisement

Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 351–360 | Cite as

Rain forest ‘conservation-through-use’? Chambira palm fibre extraction and handicraft production in a land-constrained community, Peruvian Amazon

  • Oliver T. Coomes
Article

Abstract

Does the use of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) lead to species conservation and protection of the tropical rain forest? This paper examines the use and fate of the chambira palm (Astrocaryum chambira) – a prime candidate for ‘conservation-through-use’– around a traditional peasant community in northeastern Peru where land scarcity has forced households to draw increasingly on NTFPs to supplement their incomes, including palm fibre for the production of handicrafts. Using household survey data (n = 36), we identify the specific factors that influence handicraft production, household use and economic reliance on palm fibre-based handicrafts, and the planting (semi-domestification) of the chambira palm. Our findings question the promise of rain forest ‘conservation-through-use’ and indicate the scope of challenges for species conservation, particularly among the rural poor.

Amazonia Non-timber forest products Peru Rainforest conservation Rainforest peoples 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coomes O.T. and Burt G.J. 1997. Indigenous market-oriented agroforestry: dissecting local diversity in Western Amazonia. Agroforestry Systems 37: 27–44.Google Scholar
  2. Coomes O.T. and Burt G.J. 2001. Peasant charcoal production in the Peruvian Amazon: rain forest use and economic reliance. Forest Ecology and Management 140: 39–50.Google Scholar
  3. Coomes O.T., Grimard F. and Burt G.J. 2000. Tropical forests and shifting cultivation: secondary forest fallow dynamics among traditional farmers of the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics 32: 109–124.Google Scholar
  4. Dean B. 1994. Multiple regimes of value: unequal exchange and the circulation of Urarina palm-fiber wealth. Museum Anthropology 18: 3–20.Google Scholar
  5. Godoy R., Wilkie D., Overman H., Cubas A., Cubas G., Demmer J. et al. 2000.Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest. Nature 406: 62–63.Google Scholar
  6. Greene W.H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. Grimes A., Loomis S., Jahnige P., Burnham M., Onthank K., Alarcon R. et al. 1994. Valuing the rain forest: the economic value of nontimber forest products in Ecuador. Ambio 23: 405–410.Google Scholar
  8. Holm Jensen O. and Balslev H. 1995. Ethnobotany of the fiber palm Astrocaryum chambira (Araceae) in Amazonian Ecuador. Economic Botany 49: 309–319.Google Scholar
  9. Kahn F. 1988. Ecology of economically important palms in Peruvian Amazonia. Advances in Economic Botany 6: 42–49.Google Scholar
  10. Kahn F. and de Granville J.-J. 1992. Palms in Forest Ecosystems of Amazonia. Ecological Studies 95. Springer Verlag, New York, 226 pp.Google Scholar
  11. McCann J. 1993. Extraction and depletion of fruits and fibers in Peruvian Amazonia: a coevolutionary perspective, M.S. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, 150 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Mejia K. 1988. Utilization of palms in eleven mestizo villages of the Peruvian Amazon (Ucayali River, Department of Loreto). Advances in Economic Botany 6: 130–135.Google Scholar
  13. Padoch C. 1988. The economic importance and marketing of forest and fallow products in the Iquitos region. Advances in Economic Botany 5: 74–89.Google Scholar
  14. Pedersen H.B. and Balslev H. 1992. The economic botany of Ecuadorean palms. In: Plotkin M. and Famolare L. (eds), Sustainable Harvest and Marketing of Rain Forest Products. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 173–191.Google Scholar
  15. Peters C.M., Gentry A.H. and Mendelsohn R.O. 1989.Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 655–656.Google Scholar
  16. Vormisto J. 2000. Palms in the Rainforests of Peruvian Amazonia: Uses and Distribution. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser. AII, Tom 138, Academic Dissertation, University of Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
  17. Vormisto J. 2002. Making and marketing chambira hammocks and bags in the village of Brillo Nuevo, NE Peru. Economic Botany 56: 27–40.Google Scholar
  18. Wheeler M.A. 1970. Siona use of chambira palm fiber. Economic Botany 24: 180–181.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver T. Coomes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations