Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 317–331 | Cite as

The status of dwarf carnivores on Cozumel Island, Mexico

  • Alfredo D. CuarónEmail author
  • Miguel Angel Martínez-Morales
  • Katherine W. Mcfadden
  • David Valenzuela
  • Matthew E. Gompper


Cozumel Island in the Mexican Caribbean is inhabited by four carnivores, of which two, the Cozumel coati Nasua nelsoni and pygmy raccoon Procyon pygmaeus, are endemic species. The taxonomic status of a third carnivore, a dwarf gray fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus, is undetermined, but may deserve subspecific or species-level recognition. The fourth species, the kinkajou (Potos flavus), may be a recent introduction. We review the status of these carnivores, report our field observations and results of line transect and trapping efforts, discuss current threats to these taxa, and make recommendations for their conservation. A population density of 0.43 ± 0.27 coatis/km2, and a total island population size of 150 ± 95 individuals, was estimated from 386 km of line transects in 1994–1995. Intensive trapping efforts (1479 trap-nights) in 2001 at multiple localities were unsuccessful. Pygmy raccoons were observed in the mangrove and coastal wetland areas of the island and in 2001 we captured 11 individuals with the same sampling efforts as for coatis (8.8 raccoons/1000 trap-nights). The gray fox is also apparently very rare on the island. While a few observations of the animals have been made (1984, 1994 and 2001), no animals were seen along transects and none were trapped. The primary threats to the persistence of these taxa include introduced congeners, introduced predators, parasite and disease spill-over from exotic animals, habitat fragmentation, hunting and collection as pets, and hurricanes. We suggest that the Cozumel coati, pygmy raccoon, and the Cozumel population of the gray fox be considered as Critically Endangered according to the IUCN classification system. Current conservation actions focusing on Cozumel carnivores are extremely limited. We recommend eradication of introduced species, maintenance of habitat connectivity, ex situ conservation programs, explicit public policies on land-use and sustainable development, public awareness campaigns, and continuous scientific research and monitoring.

Conservation Cozumel Island endemics Nasua nelsoni Potos flavus Procyon pygmaeus Taxonomic status Urocyon cinereoargenteus Yucatán. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson R.P. and Handley C.O. 2002. Dwarfism in insular sloths: biogeography, selection and evolutionary rates. Evolution 56: 1045–1058.Google Scholar
  2. American Ornithologist Union 1998. Checklist of North American Birds. 7th edn. AOU, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Arizmendi M.C. and Marquez-Valdelamar L. (eds) 2000. Areas de importancia para la conservación de las aves en México. CIPAMEX, CONABIO, FMCN, Mexico.Google Scholar
  4. Arriaga Cabrera L., Aguilar Sierra V., Alcocer Durand J., Jiménez Rosenberg R., Muñoz López E. and Vázquez Domínguez E. (eds) 1998. Regiones hidrológicas prioritarias: Fichas tùcnicas y mapa. CONABIO, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
  5. Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. and Laake J.L. 1993. Distance Sampling. Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  6. Carrillo E., Wong G. and Cuarón A.D. 2000. Monitoring mammal populations in Costa Rican protected areas with different hunting restrictions. Conservation Biology 14: 1580–1591.Google Scholar
  7. Case T.J. 1978. A general explanation for insular body size trends in terrestrial vertebrates. Ecology 59: 1–18.Google Scholar
  8. Cuarón A.D. 1997. Land-cover changes and mammal conservation in Mesoamerica, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Daszak P., Cunningham A.A. and Hyatt A.D. 2000. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife. Threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287: 443–449.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson W.V. 1975. The geographical setting. In: Sabloff J.A. and Rathje W.L. (eds), Changing Pre-Colombian Commercial Systems. Peabody Museum Monograph No. 3. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
  11. Decker D.M. 1991. Systematics of the coatis, genus Nasua (Mammalia: Procyonidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 104: 370–386.Google Scholar
  12. Escamilla A., Sanvicente M., Sosa M. and Galindo-Leal C. 2000. Habitat mosaic, wildlife availability and hunting in the tropical forest of Calakmul, México. Conservation Biology 14: 1592–1601.Google Scholar
  13. Foster J.B. 1964. Evolution of mammals on islands. Nature 202: 234–235.Google Scholar
  14. Funk S.M., Fiorello C.V., Cleaveland S. and Gompper M.E. 2001. The role of disease in carnivore ecology and conservation. In: Gittleman J.L., Funk S.M., Wayne R.K. and Macdonald D. (eds), Carnivore Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 443–466.Google Scholar
  15. Genoways H.H. and Jones J.K. 1975. Annotated checklist of mammals from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Occasional Papers from the Museum, Texas Tech University 26: 1–22.Google Scholar
  16. Glatston A.R. 1994. The red panda, olingos, coatis, raccoons, and their relatives: status survey and conservation action plan for procyonids and ailurids. IUCN (World Conservation Union), Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  17. Goldman E.A. 1950. Raccoons of North and Middle America. North American Fauna 60: 1–153.Google Scholar
  18. Gompper M.E. 1996. Foraging costs and benefits of coati (Nasua narica) sociality and asociality. Behavioral Ecology 7: 254–263.Google Scholar
  19. Gompper M.E. 1997. Population ecology of the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Journal of Zoology (London) 241: 441–455.Google Scholar
  20. Hall E.R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Hamblin N.L. 1984. Animal Use by Cozumel Maya. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  22. Heaney L.R. 1978. Island area and body size of insular mammals: evidence from the tri-colored squirrel (Callosciurus prevosti) of Southeast Asia. Evolution 32: 29–44.Google Scholar
  23. Hilton-Taylor C. 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of threatened species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  24. Howell S. and Webb S. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and Northern Central America. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. IUCN 2001. IUCN Red List categories and criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  26. Janzen D.H. 1970. Altruism by coatis in the face of predation by Boa constrictor. Journal of Mammalogy 51: 387–389.Google Scholar
  27. Jones J.K. Jr. and Lawlor T.E. 1965. Mammals from Isla Cozumel, Mexico, with description of a new species of harvest mouse. University Kansas Publishing, Museum of Natural History 16: 409–419.Google Scholar
  28. Lomolino M.V. 1985. Body size of mammals on islands: the island rule re-examined. American Naturalist 125: 310–326.Google Scholar
  29. Martínez-Meyer E., Martínez-Morales M. and Sosa-Escalante J. 1998. First record of the kinkajou, Potos flavus (Carnivora: Procyonidae), from Isla Cozumel, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 43: 101–102.Google Scholar
  30. Martínez-Morales M.A. 1996. The Cozumel Curassow: abundance, habitat preference and conservation, M.Phil. Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  31. Martínez-Morales M.A. 1999. Conservation status and habitat preferences of the Cozumel Curassow. Condor 101: 14–20.Google Scholar
  32. Martínez-Morales M.A. and Cuaron A.D. 1999. Boa constrictor, an introduced predator threatening the endemic fauna on Cozumel Island, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 957–963.Google Scholar
  33. Merriam C.H. 1901. Six new mammals from Cozumel Island, Yucatan. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 14: 99–104.Google Scholar
  34. Navarro D.L. and Suárez M. 1989. A survey of the pygmy raccoon (Procyon pygmaeus) of Cozumel, Mexico. Mammalia 3: 458–461.Google Scholar
  35. Schreber 1774. Die Säugethiere. 1(9): pl 42 [1774]; text: p. 187 [189] index [1774].Google Scholar
  36. Schreber 1775. Die Säugethiere. 2(13): pl 92 [1775]; text: 3(21): 361 [1776].Google Scholar
  37. SEMARNAT, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales 2002. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo.: Diario Oficial de la Federación (Segunda Sección; 6 de marzo). pp. 1–81.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor H.L. and Cooley C.R. 1995. A multivariate analysis of morphological variation among parthenogenetic Teiid lizards of the Cnemidophorus cozumela complex. Herpetologica 51: 67–76.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas L., Laake J.L., Derry J.F., Buckland S.T., Borgers D.L., Anderson D.R. et al. 1998. Distance 3.5. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK, available at http: / / distance /.Google Scholar
  40. Thomas O. 1901. New insular forms of Nasua and Dasyprocta. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7: 271–273.Google Scholar
  41. Valenzuela D. 1998. Natural history of the white-nosed coati, Nasua narica, in a tropical dry forest of western Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología 3: 26–44.Google Scholar
  42. Valenzuela D., Ceballos G. and García A. 2000. Mange epizootic in white-nosed coatis in western Mexico. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 36: 56–63.Google Scholar
  43. Weidie A.E. 1985. Geology of the Yucatan Platform, Part 1. In: Ward W.C., Weidie A.E. and Back W. (eds), Geology and Hydrogeology of the Yucatan and Quaternary Geology of Northeastern Yucatan Peninsula. New Orleans Geological Society, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  44. Wilson D.E. and Reeder D.M. (eds) 1993. Mammal Species of theWorld: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 2nd edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfredo D. Cuarón
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miguel Angel Martínez-Morales
    • 1
  • Katherine W. Mcfadden
    • 2
  • David Valenzuela
    • 3
  • Matthew E. Gompper
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología de los Recursos Naturales, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Morelia, MichoacánMexico (e-mail
  2. 2.Center for Environmental Research and ConservationColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Centro de Educación Ambiental e Investigación Sierra de HuautlaUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de MorelosCol. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, MorelosMexico
  4. 4.Department of Fisheries and Wildlife SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations