Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 483–493 | Cite as

Mechanisms for Dominance in An Early Successional Old Field by the Invasive Non-Native Lespedeza Cuneata (Dum. Cours.) G. Don

  • Alice L. Brandon
  • David J. Gibson
  • Beth A. Middleton
Article

Abstract

Researchers studying invasive plants often concentrate their efforts on predictive models thought to allow invasive plants to dominate native landscapes. However, if an invasive is already well established then experimental research is necessary to provide the information necessary to effectively manage the species. Prescribing appropriate management strategies without prior experimental research may not only be ineffective but also may squander limited resources or have the unintended consequence of furthering spread. Lespedeza cuneata(Dum. Cours.) G. Don. is a well-established invasive plant of old fields and tall-grass prairie in the US. Managers suspect this species shades-out native plants and this is proposed as its primary mechanism for dominance. Using field experiments we tested probable factors allowing the species to establish itself and, once established, interfere in old field plant communities. We also examined the effects of two common anthropogenic disturbances (mowing and nutrients) on L. cuneata growth and establishment. When L. cuneata was treated (clipping, herbicide and stem pull-back) there was a significant increase in species richness and native species cover. Stem density and canopy cover of L. cuneata increased significantly with mowing frequency but decreased with nutrient input. We suggest that mowing benefits L. cuneata while also hindering woody competition. Results also indicate L. cuneata is less prevalent on nutrient enriched soils than on unamended soil. Lespedeza cuneata appears to suppress native plants by shading them out and it can subsequently take over grassland communities. Since it has a varying response to human induced disturbances and may actually benefit from mowing, land managers should be cautious when utilizing this as a management tool.

clipping herbicide light availability mowing nitrogen non-indigenous plants nutrient inputs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams M and Hulbert LC (1987) Effect of topographic position and re on species composition in a tall grass prairie in northeast Kansas. American Midland Naturalist 117:442–445Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz FA (1996) Plants in Changing Environments. Cambridge University Press, 320 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth MS, Caldwell MM and Stark JM (2003) Overlapping resource use in three Great Basin species: implications for community invasibility and vegetation dynamics. Journal of Ecology 91:36–48Google Scholar
  4. Brandon AL (2000) Effects of Lespedeza cuneata, an invasive species,on a successional old-eld plant community. MS thesis, Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois,76 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson WP and Barrett GW (1988) Succession in old-eld plant communities: effects of contrasting types of nutrient enrichment. Ecology 69:984–994Google Scholar
  6. Carson WP and Pickett STA (1990) Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-eld plant community. Ecology 71:226–238Google Scholar
  7. Coblentz BE (1990) Exotic organisms: a dilemma for conservation biology. Conservation Biology 4:261–265Google Scholar
  8. Collins SL, Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Blair JM and Steinauer EM (1998) Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tall grass prairie. Science 280:745–747Google Scholar
  9. Davis GT (1987) The vascular flora of the Touch of Nature Environmental Center. MS thesis, Department of Plant Biology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis MA, Grime JP and Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528–534Google Scholar
  11. Eddy TA and Moore CM (1998) Effects of sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont)G. Don) invasion on oak savannas in Kansas. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 86:57–62Google Scholar
  12. Gibson DJ (1988) Plant spatial patterns in dune grassland: the maintenance and heterogeneity. Journal of Ecology 76: 497–508Google Scholar
  13. Gibson DJ, Middleton BA, Saunders GW, Mathis M, Weaver WT, Neely J, Rivera J and Oyler M (1999) Learning ecology by doing ecology: long-term field experiments in succession. American Biology Teacher 61:217–222Google Scholar
  14. Guernsey WJ (1970) Sericea Lespedeza: its use and management. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 29 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Henry DS, Kuenstler WF and Sanders SA (1981) Establishment of forage species on surface-mined land in Kentucky. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36:111–113Google Scholar
  16. Hobbs RJ and Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324–337Google Scholar
  17. Hoveland CS and Donnelly ED (1985) The Lespedezas. In: Heath ME, Barnes RF and Metcalfe DS (eds) Forages: the Science of Grassland Agriculture, pp 126–132. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  18. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources (1994) The Changing Illinois Environment: Critical Trends. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Springfield, Illinois, 89 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalburtji KL and Mosjidis JA (1993) Effects of sericea lespedeza residues on cool season grasses. Journal of Range Management 46:315–319Google Scholar
  20. Kolb A, Alpert P, Enters D and Holzapfel C (2002) Patterns of invasion within a grassland community. Journal of Ecology 90:871–881Google Scholar
  21. Kotanen PM, Bergelson J and Hazlett DL (1998) Habitat of native and exotic plants in Colorado shortgrass steppe: a comparative approach. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 664–672Google Scholar
  22. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW and Wolnger RD (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  23. Mays DA and Bengtson JW (1985) ‘Interstate’ sericea lespedeza: a long-term nitrogen source for loblolly pine growing on coal mine spoil. Tree Planters' Notes US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 36(3):9–12Google Scholar
  24. McGraw RL and Hoveland CS (1995) The Lespedezas. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA and Nelson CJ (eds) Forages: Volume 1: an Introduction to Grassland Agriculture, pp 261–271. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  25. McIntyre S and Lavorel S (1994) Predicting richness of native, rare and exotic plants in response to habitat and disturbance variables across a variegated landscape. Conservation Biology 8:521–531Google Scholar
  26. Meiners SJ, Pickett STA and Cadenasso ML (2002) Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field successions: community patterns and associations. Ecography 25:215–223Google Scholar
  27. Mohlenbrock RH (1986) Guide to the Vascular Flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Illinois, 507 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Rejmanek M (1989) Invasibility of plant communities. In: Drake JA (ed) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective, pp 369–388. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Remaley T (1998) Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plant Working Group: Chinese Lespedeza. Retrieved from www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/lecu1.htm on 30 January 2003Google Scholar
  30. Rice PM, Toney JC, Bedunah DJ and Carlson CE (1997) Plant community diversity and control of Centaurea maculosa. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1397–1412Google Scholar
  31. Ritchie ME and Tilman D (1995) Response of legumes to herbivores and nutrients during succession on a nitrogenpoor soil. Ecology 76:2648–2655Google Scholar
  32. Rubio GT, Walk Z, Yan GE, Liao H and Lynch JP (2001) Root gravitropism and below-ground competition among neighbouring plants: a modelling approach. Annals of Botany London 88:929–940Google Scholar
  33. SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, Fourth Addition, Vol.1, Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  34. Schierenbeck KA, Mack RN and Sharitz RR (1994) Effects of herbivory on growth and biomass allocation in native and introduced species of Lonicera. Ecology 75:1661–1672Google Scholar
  35. Skeel VA and Gibson DJ (1998) Photosynthetic rates and vegetative production of Sorghastrum nutans in response to competition at two strip mines and a railroad prairie. Photosynthetica 35:139–149Google Scholar
  36. Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn., Freeman, San Francisco, California, 859 ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Spyreas G, Gibson DJ and Middleton BA (2001) Effects of endophyte infection in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea: Poaceae)on community diversity. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162:1237–1245Google Scholar
  38. Stevens S (2002) Element Stewardship Abstract for Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont-Cours.)G. Don Sericea Lespedeza, Chinese Bush Cover. The Nature Conservancy's Wildland Invasive Species Team, University of California, Davis, California.Retrieved from http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/lespcune.html on 30 January 2002Google Scholar
  39. Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Grime JP and Burke MJW (2001) Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5-year invasion experiment using native species. Journal of Ecology 89:1054–1060Google Scholar
  40. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service (2001) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.1.National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Retrieved from http://plants.usda.gov on 30 January 2003Google Scholar
  41. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (1998) Invasive Alien Plant Species of Virginia: Chinese Lespedeza. Richmond, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitehead DC (1995) Grassland Nitrogen. Cab International, Oxon, UK,416 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson MV and Clark DL (2001) Controlling invasive Arrhenatherum elatius and promoting native prairie grasses through mowing. Applied Vegetation Science 4:129–138Google Scholar
  44. Woods KD (1997) Community response to plant invasion. In: Luken JO and Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions, pp 56–68. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice L. Brandon
    • 1
  • David J. Gibson
    • 2
  • Beth A. Middleton
    • 1
  1. 1.Illinois Natural History SurveyChicagoUSA; e-mail:
  2. 2.Department of Plant BiologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations