Biological Invasions

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 445–461 | Cite as

The Effects of Invasive Ants on Prospective Ant Mutualists

  • J.H. Ness
  • J.L. Bronstein

Abstract

Ants are recognized for their abilities both to engage in mutualistic interactions with diverse taxa, and to invade and dominate habitats outside their native geographic range. Here, we review the effects of invasive ants on three guilds of mutualists: ant-dispersed plants, ant-tended arthropods, and ant-tended plants. We contrast how those three guilds are affected by invasions, how invasive ants differ from native ants in their interactions with those guilds, and how the seven most invasive ant species differ amongst themselves in those interactions. Ant-dispersed plants typically suffer from interactions with invasive ants, a result we attribute to the small size of those ants relative to native seed-dispersing ants. Effects on the ant-tended arthropods and plants were more frequently positive or non-significant, although it is unclear how often these interactions are reciprocally beneficial. For example, invasive ants frequently attack the natural enemies of these prospective mutualists even in the absence of rewards, and may attack those prospective mutualists. Many studies address whether invasive ants provide some benefit to the partner, but few have asked how invasives rank within a hierarchy of prospective mutualists that includes other ant species. Because ant invasions typically result in the extirpation of native ants, this distinction is highly relevant to predicting and managing the effects of such invasions. Interspecific comparisons suggest that invasive ants are poorer partners of ant-dispersed plants than are most other ants, equally effective partners of ant-tended arthropods, and perhaps better partners of ant-tended plants. Last, we note that the invasive ant taxa differ amongst themselves in how they affect these three mutualist guilds, and in how frequently their interactions with prospective mutualists have been studied. The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, appears particularly likely to disrupt all three mutualistic interactions, relative to the other six invasive species included in this review.

exotic species extrafloral nectar formicidae homoptera indirect effects invasion mutualism myrmecochory seed dispersal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnew CW, Sterling WI and Dean DA (1982) Influence of cotton nectar on red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera-Formicidae) and other predators. Environmental Entomology 11: 629–634Google Scholar
  2. Ali AD, Reagan TE and Flynn JL (1984) Influence of selected weedy and weed-free sugarcane habitats on diet composition and foraging activity of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 13: 1037–1041Google Scholar
  3. Ambrose DP and Livingstone D (1979) Bio-ecology of Lophocephala-guerini lap (Reduviidae, Harpactorinae) a coprophagous reduviid from the Palghat Gap, India. Journal of Natural History 13: 581–588Google Scholar
  4. Andersen AN (1988) Dispersal distance as a bene t of myrmecochory. Oecologia 75: 507–511Google Scholar
  5. Andersen AN and Morrison SC (1998) Myrmecochory in Australia's seasonal tropics: effects of disturbance on distance dispersal. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 483–491Google Scholar
  6. Bach CE (1991) Direct and indirect interactions between ants (Pheidole megacephala), scales (Coccus viridis) and plants (Pluchea indica). Oecologia 87: 233–239Google Scholar
  7. Baker TC, Van Vorhis Key SE and Gaston LK (1985) Bait-preference tests for the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Journal of Economic Entomology 78: 1083–1088Google Scholar
  8. Bartlett BR (1961) The influence of ants upon parasites,predators and scale insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54: 543–551Google Scholar
  9. Barzman MS and Daane KM (2001) Host-handling behaviors in parasitoids of the black scale:a case for ant-mediated evolution. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 237–247Google Scholar
  10. Beardsley Jr JW, Su TH, McEwen FL and Gerling D (1982) Field investigations on the interrelationships of the big-headed ant,the gray pineapple mealybug,and pineapple mealybug wilt disease in Hawaii. Proceedings, Hawaiian Entomological Society 24: 51–67Google Scholar
  11. Beattie AJ and Culver DC (1981) The guild of myrmecochores in the herbaceous flora of West Virginia forest. Ecology 62, 107–115Google Scholar
  12. Beattie AJ and Lyons N (1975) Seed dispersal in Viola (Violaceae):adaptations and strategies. American Journal of Botany 62: 714–722Google Scholar
  13. Bentley BL (1976) Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology 57: 815–820Google Scholar
  14. Bond W and Slingsby P (1984) Collapse of an ant-plant mutualism:the Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis ) and myrmecochorous Proteaceae. Ecology 65: 1031–1037Google Scholar
  15. Bremner OH (1931) Relation of ants to aphid control. California Cultivator 77: 488–489Google Scholar
  16. Brinkman MA, Gardner WA, Ipser RM and Diffie SK (2001) Ground-dwelling ant species attracted to four food baits in Georgia. Journal of Entomological Science 36: 461–463Google Scholar
  17. Bristow CM (1991) Are ant–aphid associations a tritrophic interaction?Oleander aphids and Argentine ants. Oecologia 87: 514–521Google Scholar
  18. Buckley R (1987) Interactions involving plants, Homoptera and ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 111–135Google Scholar
  19. Buckley R and Gullan P (1991) More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera:Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23: 282–286Google Scholar
  20. Butz Huryn VM (1997) Ecological Impacts of introduced honeybees. Quarterly Review of Biology 72: 275–297Google Scholar
  21. Campbell CAM (1994) Homoptera associated with the ants Crematogaster clariventris, Pheidole megacephala and Tetramorium aculeatum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on cocoa in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84: 313–318Google Scholar
  22. Carney SE, Byerley MB, Farrar JP and Holway DA (2002) Does size matter? Invasive argentine ants and the breakdown of seed dispersal mutualisms in California, p 94. Abstracts, 87th Annual Meeting, Ecological Society of America. Tucson, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  23. Carney SE, Byerley MB and Holway DA (2003) Invasive argentine ants (Linepithema humile )do not replace native ants as seed dispersers of Dendromecon rigida (Papaveraceae) in California, USA. Oecologia 135: 576–582Google Scholar
  24. Chapman RE and Bourke AFG (2001) The influence of sociality on the conservation biology of social insects. Ecology Letters 4: 650–662Google Scholar
  25. Cherry RH and Nuessly GS (1992) Distribution and abundance of imported red re ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) in Florida sugarcane elds. Environmental Entomology 21: 167–770Google Scholar
  26. Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413: 635–639Google Scholar
  27. Clark DB, Guayasamin C, Pazmino O, Donoso C and Paez de Villacis Y (1982) The tramp ant Wasmannia auropunctata: Autoecology and effects on ant diversity and distribution on Santa Cruz island, Galapagos. Biotropica 14: 196–207Google Scholar
  28. Clarke SR and DeBarr GL (1996) Impacts of red imported re ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) on striped pine scale (Homoptera:Coccidae) populations. Journal of Entomological Science 31: 229–239Google Scholar
  29. Clarke SR, DeBarr GL, and Berisford CW (1989) The life history of Toumeyella pini (Homoptera:Coccidae) in Loblolly pine seed orchards in Georgia. Canadian Entomologist 121: 853–859Google Scholar
  30. Compton SG and Robertson HG (1988) Complex interactions between mutualisms: ants attending homopterans protect fig seeds and pollinators. Ecology 69: 1302–1305Google Scholar
  31. Cornelius ML and Grace JK (1997) Influence of brood on the nutritional preferences of the tropical ant species, Pheidole megacephala and Ochetellus glaber (Mayr). Journal of Entomological Science 32: 421–429Google Scholar
  32. Cudjoe AR, Neuenschwander P and Copland MJW (1993) Interference by ants in biological control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera: Psuedococcidae) in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83: 15–22Google Scholar
  33. Cushman JH (1991) Host-plant mediation of insect mutualisms: variable outcomes in herbivore–ant interactions. Oikos 61: 138–144Google Scholar
  34. Cushman JH, Compton SG, Zachariades C, Ware AB, Nefdt RJC and Rashbrook VK (1998) Geographic and taxonomic distribution of a positive interaction: ant-tended homopterans indirectly benefit figs across southern Africa. Oecologia 116: 373–380Google Scholar
  35. Dahlsten DL, Zuparko RL, Hajek AE, Rowney DL, Dreistadt SH (1999) Long-term sampling of Eucallipterus tiliae (Homoptera: Drepanosiphidae) and associated natural enemies in a northern California site. Environmental Entomology 28: 845–850Google Scholar
  36. Davidson DW (1997) The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61: 153–181Google Scholar
  37. Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants:a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecological Entomology 23: 484–490Google Scholar
  38. Delabie JHC, da Enacrnacao AMV and Cazola IM (1994) Relations between the little re ant,Wasmannia auropunctata, and its associated mealybug,Planococcus citri, in Brazilian cocoa farms. In: William DF (ed) Exotic Ants: Biology, Impact and Control of Introduced Species, pp 91–103, Westview Press, Boulder,ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  39. de la Fuente MAS and Marquis RJ (1999) The role of anttended extrafloral nectaries in the protection and bene t of a Neotropical rainforest tree. Oecologia 118: 192–202Google Scholar
  40. Dejean A, Ngnegueu PR and Bourgoin T (1996) Trophobiosis between ants and Peregrinus maidis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha, Delphacidae). Sociobiology 28: 111–120Google Scholar
  41. Dejean A, Ngnegueu PR, Durand JL and Bourgoin T (1997) The influence of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), particularly tramp species, on the proliferation of a maize pest. Sociobiology 30: 85–93Google Scholar
  42. Dejean A, Orivel J, Durand JL, Ngnegueu PN, Bourgoin T and Gibernau M (2000) Interference between ant species distribution in different habitats and the density of a maize pest. Sociobiology 35: 175–189Google Scholar
  43. De Souza ALB, Delabie JHC and Fowler HG (1998) Wasmannia spp. (Hym. Formicidae) and insect damages to cocoa in Brazilian farms. Journal of Applied Entomology 122: 339–241Google Scholar
  44. Dutcher JD, Estes PM and Dutcher MJ (1999) Interactions in entomology: aphids, aphidophaga, and ants in pecan orchards. Journal of Entomological Science 34: 40–56Google Scholar
  45. Eastwood R and Fraser AM (1999) Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 503–537Google Scholar
  46. Engel W, Fischer MK, Wackers FL and Volkl W (2001) Interactions between extrafloral nectaries, aphids and ants: are there competition effects between plant and homopteran sugar sources? Oecologia 129: 577–584Google Scholar
  47. Erickson J (1971) The displacement of native ant species by the introduced argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr. Psyche 78: 257–266Google Scholar
  48. Eubanks MD (2001) Estimates of the direct and indirect effects of red imported fire ant on biological control in field crops. Biological Control 21: 34–43Google Scholar
  49. Eubanks MD, Blackwell SA, Parish CJ, Delamar ZD and Hull-Sanders H (2002) Intraguild predation of beneficial arthropods by red imported fire ants in cotton. Environmental Entomology 31: 1168–1174Google Scholar
  50. Flanders SE (1945) Coincident infestations of Aonidiella citrina and Coccus hesperidium, a result of ant activity. Journal of Economic Entomology 38: 711–712Google Scholar
  51. Fleet RR and Young BL (2000) Facultative mutualism between imported re ants (Solenopsis invicta) and a legume (Senna occidentalis). Southwestern Naturalist 45: 289–298Google Scholar
  52. Fluker SS, Huddleston EW and Beardsley JW (1968) Some effects of big-headed ant on populations of the pink sugarcane mealybug. Journal of Economic Entomology 61: 474–477Google Scholar
  53. Frazer BD and van den Bosch R (1973) Biological control of the walnut aphid in California: the interrelationship of the aphid and its parasite. Environmental Entomology 2: 561–568Google Scholar
  54. Freitas L, Galetto L, Bernadrello G and Paoli ASS (2000) Ant exclusion and reproduction of Croton sarcopetalus (Euphorbiaceae). Flora 195: 398–402Google Scholar
  55. Gomez C and Espadaler X (1998) Myrmecochorous dispersal distances: a world survey. Journal of Biogeography 25: 573–580Google Scholar
  56. Gomez C and Oliveras J (2003) Can the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile Mayr) replace native ants in myrmecochory? Acta Oecoligica 24: 47–53Google Scholar
  57. Gomez C, Pons P and Bas JM (2003) Effects of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile on seed dispersal and seedling emergence of Rhamnus alaternus. Ecography 26: 532–538Google Scholar
  58. Gonzalez-Hernandez H, Johnson MW and Reimer NJ (1999) Impact of Pheidole megacephala (F) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the biological control of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Biological Control 15: 145–152Google Scholar
  59. Greenslade PJM (1972) Comparative ecology of four tropical ant species. Insectes Sociaux 19: 195–212Google Scholar
  60. Hahn DA and Wheeler DE (2002) Seasonal foraging activity and bait preferences of ants on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 34: 348–356Google Scholar
  61. Haines IH and Haines JB (1978) Pest status of the crazy ant, Anoplolepis longipes (Jerdon) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the Seychelles. Bulletin of Entomological Research 68: 627–638Google Scholar
  62. Helms KR and Vinson SB (2002) Coexistence of native ants with the red imported re ant,Solenopsis invicta. American Midland Naturalist 46: 396–400Google Scholar
  63. Hobbs RJ (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in southwestern Australia. Conservation Biology 15: 1522–1528Google Scholar
  64. Hoffman BD, Andersen AN and Hill GJE (1999) Impact of an introduced ant on native rain forest invertebrates: Pheidole megacephala in monsoonal Australia. Oecologia 120: 595–604Google Scholar
  65. Hölldobler B and Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  66. Holtcamp WN, Grant WE and Vinson SB (1997) Patch use under predation hazard: Effect of the red imported re ant on deer mouse foraging behavior. Ecology 78: 308–317Google Scholar
  67. Holway DA (1998) Effect of argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia 116: 252–258Google Scholar
  68. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND and Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 181–233Google Scholar
  69. Hook AW and Porter SD (1990) Destruction of harvester ant colonies by invading re ants in south-central Texas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Southwestern Naturalist 35: 477–478Google Scholar
  70. Horvitz CC (1981) Analysis of how ant behaviors affect germination in a tropical myrmecochore Calathea microcephala (P. & E) Koernicke (Marantaceae): microsite selection and aril removal by neotropical ants, Odontomachus, Pachycondyla, and Solenopsis (Formicidae). Oecologia 51: 47–52Google Scholar
  71. Horvitz CC (1991) Light environments, stage structure, and dispersal syndromes of Costa Rican Marantaceae. In: Huxley CR and Cutler DF (eds) Ant–Plant Interactions, pp 463–485. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Horvitz CC and Beattie AJ (1980) Ant dispersal of Calathea (Marantaceae) seeds by carnivorous ponerines (Formicidae)in a tropical rain forest. American Journal of Botany 67: 321–326Google Scholar
  73. Horvitz CC and Schemske DW (1984) Effects of ants and an ant-tended herbivore on seed production of a neotropical herb. Ecology 65: 1369–1378Google Scholar
  74. Horvitz CC and Schemske DW (1986) Seed dispersal of a neotropical myrmecochore–variation in removal rates and dispersal distance. Biotropica 18: 319–323Google Scholar
  75. Human KG and Gordon DM (1996) Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia 105: 405–412Google Scholar
  76. Human KG and Gordon DM (1997) Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in Northern California. Conservation Biology 11: 1242–1248Google Scholar
  77. Human KG, Weiss S, Weiss A, Sandler B and Gordon DM (1998) Effects of abiotic factors on the distribution of the invasive argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 27: 822–833Google Scholar
  78. Jahn GC and Beardsley JW (1996) Effects of Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on survival and dispersal of Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Homoptera: Psuedococcidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 89: 1124–1129Google Scholar
  79. Kaakeh W and Dutcher JD (1992) Foraging preferences of red imported fire ants (Hymneoptera: Formicidae) among three species of summer cover crops and their extracts. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 389–394Google Scholar
  80. Kaplan I and Eubanks MD (2002) Disruption of cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae)–natural enemy dynamics by red imported re ants. Environmental Entomology 31: 1175–1183Google Scholar
  81. Kitching RL (1987) Aspects of the natural history of the lycaenid butterfly Allotinus major in Sulawesi. Journal of Natural History 21: 535–544Google Scholar
  82. Kearns CA, Inouye DW and Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 83–112Google Scholar
  83. Koptur S (1979) Facultative mutualism between weedy vetches bearing extrafloral nectaries and weedy ants in California. American Journal of Botany 66: 1016–1020Google Scholar
  84. Koptur S (1992) Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: Bernays EA (ed) Insect–Plant Interactions,Vol 4, pp 81–129. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  85. Koptur S and Truong N (1998) Facultative ant-plant interactions:Nectar sugar preferences of introduced pest ant species in South Florida. Biotropica 30: 179–189Google Scholar
  86. Krushelnycky PD and Reimer NJ (1998) Bait preference by the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Haleakala National Park, Hawaii. Environmental Entomology 27: 1482–1487Google Scholar
  87. Lach L (2003) Invasive ants:unwanted partners in ant-plant interactions? Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 91–108Google Scholar
  88. Lanza J (1991) Response of re ants (Formicidae: Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata) to arti cial nectars with amino acids. Ecological Entomology 16: 203–210Google Scholar
  89. Lanza J, Vargo EL, Pulim S and Chang YZ (1993) Preferences of the fire ants Solenopsis invicta and S. geminata (Hymneoptera: Formicidae) for amino acid and sugar components of extrafloral nectars. Environmental Entomology 22: 411–417Google Scholar
  90. Larsen KJ, Vega FE, Moya-Raygoza G and Nault LR (1991) Ants (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) associated with the leafhopper Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on Gamagrasses in Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 498–501Google Scholar
  91. Lupin YD (1984) Changes in the native fauna of the Galapagos Islands following invasion by the little red re ant, Wasmannia auropunctata. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 21: 229–242Google Scholar
  92. Majer JD (1985) Recolonization by ant of rehabilitated mineral sand mines on North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, with particular reference to seed removal. Australian Journal of Ecology 10: 31–48Google Scholar
  93. Markin GP (1970) Foraging behavior of the Argentine ant in a California citrus grove. Journal of Economic Entomology 63: 740–744Google Scholar
  94. McGlynn TP (1999) Non-native ants are smaller than related native ants. American Naturalist 154: 690–699Google Scholar
  95. McLain DK (1983) Ants,extra floral nectaries,and herbivory on the passion vine Passiflora incarnata. American Midland Naturalist 110: 433–439Google Scholar
  96. Michaud JP and Browning HW (1999) Seasonal abundance of the brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemies in Puerto Rico. Florida Entomologist 82: 424–447Google Scholar
  97. Moreno DS, Haney PB and Luck RF (1987) Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon as barriers to argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) foraging in citrus tress. Journal of Economic Entomology 80: 209–214Google Scholar
  98. Morrill WL (1977) Red imported fire ant foraging in a greenhouse. Environmental Entomology 6: 416–418Google Scholar
  99. Morrill WL (1978) Red imported fire ant predation on the alfalfa weevil and pea aphid. Journal of Economic Entomology 71: 867–868Google Scholar
  100. Ness JH (2003) Contrasting exotic Solenopsis invicta and native Forelius pruinosus ants as mutualists with Catalpa bignonioides, a native plant. Ecological Entomology 28: 247–251Google Scholar
  101. Ness JH (2004) Forest edges and fire ants alter the seed shadow of an ant-dispersed plant. Oecologia 138: 448–454Google Scholar
  102. Ness JH, Bronstein JL, Andersen AN and Holland JN (2004)Ant body size predicts the dispersal distance of antadapted seeds:implications of small-ant invasions. Ecology 85 (in press)Google Scholar
  103. Newell W and Barber TC (1913) The Argentine Ant. Bur. Entomological Bulletin 122: 1–98Google Scholar
  104. Nickerson JC, Rolph Kay CA, Buschman LL and Whitcomb WH (1977) The presence of Spissistilus festinus as a factor affecting egg predation by ants in soybeans. Florida Entomologist 60: 193–199Google Scholar
  105. Offenberg J (2001) Balancing between mutualism and exploitation:the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49: 304–310Google Scholar
  106. Oliveira PS, Rico-Gray V, Diaz-Castelazo C and Castillo-Guevara C (1999) Interactions between ants, extrafloral nectaries, and insect herbivores in Neotropical sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology 13: 623–631Google Scholar
  107. Phillips PA and Sherk CJ (1991) To control mealybugs, stop honeydew-seeking ants. California Agriculture 45: 26–28Google Scholar
  108. Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB and Travassos MA (2002) The ecology and evo lution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annual Review of Entomology 47: 733–771Google Scholar
  109. Pontin AJ (1978) The numbers and distribution of subterranean aphids and their exploitation by the ant Lasius flavus (Fabr.). Ecological Entomology 3: 203–207Google Scholar
  110. Porter SD and Savignano DA (1990) Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod communities. Ecology 71: 2095–2106Google Scholar
  111. Quilichini A and Debussche M (2000) Seed dispersal and germination patterns in a rare Mediterranean island endemic (Anchusa crispa Viv., Boranginaceae). Acta Oecologica 21: 303–313Google Scholar
  112. Reimer NJ, Cope ML and Yasuda G (1993) Interference of Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with the biological control of Coccus viridis (Homoptera: Coccidae) in coffee. Environmental Entomology 22: 483–488Google Scholar
  113. Rust MK, Reierson DA, Paine E and Blum LJ (2000) Seasonal activity and bait preferences of the Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 17: 201–212Google Scholar
  114. Schemske DW (1980) The evolutionary signi cance of extrafloral nectar production by Costus woodsonii (Zingiberaceae): an experimental analysis of ant production. Journal of Ecology 68: 959–967Google Scholar
  115. Simberloff D and Von Holle S (1999) Positive interactions of non-indigenous species:invasional meltdown? Biological Invasions 1: 21–32Google Scholar
  116. Stechman DH, Volkl W and Stary P (1996) Ant attendance as a critical factor in the biological control of the banana aphid Pentalonia nigronervosa Coq. (Hom.Aphidae) in Oceania. Journal of Applied Entomology 120: 119–123Google Scholar
  117. Stein MB, Thorvilson HG and Johnson JW (1990) Seasonal changes in bait preference by red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera:Formicidae). Florida Entomologist 73: 117–123Google Scholar
  118. Sterling WL, Jones D and Dean DA (1979) Failure of the red imported fire ant to reduce entomophagous insect and spider abundance in a cotton agroecosystem. Environmental Entomology 8: 976–981Google Scholar
  119. Steyn JJ (1954) The effects of the cosmopolitan brown house ant (Pheidole megacephala F) on citrus red scale (Aonidiella aurantii Mask) at Letaba. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 17: 252–264Google Scholar
  120. Stiles JH and Jones RH (2001) Top-down control by the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta). American Midland Naturalist 146: 171–185Google Scholar
  121. Suarez AV, Bolger DT and Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology 79: 2041–2056Google Scholar
  122. Sudd JH and Sudd ME (1985) Seasonal changes in the response of wood ants (Formica lugubris) to sucrose baits. Ecological Entomology 10: 89–97Google Scholar
  123. Tedders WL, Reilly CC, Wood BW, Morrison RK and Lofgren CS (1990) Behavior of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in pecan orchards. Environmental Entomology 19: 44–53Google Scholar
  124. Tennant LE and Porter SD (1991) Comparison of diets of two fire ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): solid and liquid components. Journal of Entomological Science 26: 450–465Google Scholar
  125. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA and Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 5948–5953Google Scholar
  126. Vega SJ and Rust MK (2001) The Argentine ant–a significant invasive species in agricultural, urban and natural environments. Sociobiology 37: 3–25Google Scholar
  127. Vinson SB and Scarborough TA (1989) Impact of the imported fire ant on laboratory populations of cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii) predators. Florida Entomologist 72: 107–111Google Scholar
  128. Vinson SB and Scarborough TA (1991) Interactions between Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Rhopalosiphum maidis (Homoptera: Aphididae), and the parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 158–164Google Scholar
  129. Ward PS (1987) Distribution of the introduced Argentine ant (Iridomyrmex humilis) in natural habitats of the lower Sacramento valley and its effects on the indigenous ant fauna. Hilgardia 55: 1–16Google Scholar
  130. Washburn JO (1984) Mutualism between a cynipid gall wasp and ants. Ecology 65: 654–656Google Scholar
  131. Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 8: 307–344Google Scholar
  132. Way MJ, Javier G and Heong KL (2002) The role of ants, especially the fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the biological control of tropical upland rice pests. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92: 431–437Google Scholar
  133. Wetterer JK (1997) Ants on Cecropia in Hawaii. Biotropica 29: 128–132Google Scholar
  134. Wetterer JK, Miller SE, Wheeler DE, Olson CA, Polhemus DA, Pitts M, Ashton IW, Himler AG, Yospin MM, Helms KR, Harken EL, Gallaher J, Dunning CE, Nelson M, Litsinger J, Southern A and Burgess TL (1999) Ecological dominance by Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an invasive tramp ant, in Biosphere 2. Florida Entomologist 82: 381–388Google Scholar
  135. Wetterer JK, Wetterer AL and Hebard E (2001) Impact of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, on the native ants of Santa Cruz Island, California. Sociobiology 38: 709–721Google Scholar
  136. Zettler JA, Spira TP and Allen CR (2001) Ant–seed mutualisms: can red imported re ants sour the relationship? Biological Conservation 101: 249–253Google Scholar
  137. Zettler JA, Robinson BA, Allen CR and Spira TP (2003) Ants reduce oviposition success of Gulf Fritillaries on Passiflora incarnata. Abstracts, 88th Annual Meeting of the Ecological Society of America, Savannah, GeorgiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.H. Ness
    • 1
  • J.L. Bronstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA; e-mail:

Personalised recommendations