Advertisement

Certain Behavioral Traits of Small Mammals in Abnormal Social Environment

  • S. A. Shilova
  • D. P. Orlenev
Article

Abstract

In a social vacuum following a catastrophic decline in population density of small mammals, species-specific adaptive behavioral mechanisms optimizing reconstitution of the spatial and social structure are manifested to a different extent in different species. At the same time, the rate of structure and population recovery depends on specific social organization of a species. The field observation data on the behavior of three species, Pallas' pika as well as Mongolian and midday gerbils, in an experimentally depleted population are presented. Mongolian gerbil living in family groups demonstrated developed adaptive mechanisms of this kind in contrast to two other species with pronounced individual territorialism.

Keywords

Population Density Social Organization Field Observation Social Environment Small Mammal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Agren, G., Social and Territorial Behaviour in the Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) under Seminatural Conditions, Biol. Behav.,1976, vol. 1, pp. 267–285.Google Scholar
  2. Andzheevskii, R. and Vrotslavek, Kh., Trial Analysis of Processes Going during Colonization of a Caught Area by Small Mammals, Voprosy Ekologii,1962, vol. 6, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, S.A., Exploring, Sampling, Neophobia and Feeding, Rodent Pest Control, Florida: Boca Ration, 1988, pp. 295–317.Google Scholar
  4. Bezel', V.S., Bol'shakov, V.N., and Vorobeichik, E.L., Populyatsionnaya ekotoksikologiya(Population Ecotoxicology), Moscow: Nauka, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Bibikov, D.I. and Zhirnova, N.M., On the Behavior of Marmots Survived after the Extermination, Tr. Sredneaziatsk. nauchno-issledovatel'skogo protivochumn. in-ta(Proc. Central Asian Research Antiplaque Inst.), Alma-Ata, 1956 pp. 81–85.Google Scholar
  6. Bol'shakov, V.N., Boikov, V.N., Batkova, F.N., et al., Effect of Local Extermination on the Population and Structure of Forest Biocenoses, Ekologiya, 1973, no. 6, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
  7. Chabovskii, A.V., Comparative Analysis of Social Structure in Three Gerbils of MerionesGenus, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Colvin, B.A. and Jackson, W.B., Urban Rodent Control Programs for 21st Century, Sinngeltn, G., Hinds, J., Jeirs, H., and Zhang, Z., Eds., Canberra, 1999, pp. 243–258.Google Scholar
  9. Derevshchikov, A.G., Experience of Mongolian Gerbil Extermination Using Poisoned Bait, in Dokl. Irkutsk: protivochumn. in-ta.(Proc. Irkutsk Antiplague), 1971, no. 10, pp. 263–264.Google Scholar
  10. Derviz, D.G., The Structure of Pica Settlements, Tez. Dokladov III S"ezd VTO AN SSSR(Proc. III Conf. VTO Akad. Nauk USSR), Moscow, 1982, vol. 1, pp. 183–184.Google Scholar
  11. Fitzgerald, B.M., Karl, B.J., and Moller, H., Spatial Organization and Ecology of a Sparse Population of House Mice (Mus musculus) in a New Zealand Forest, J. Anim. Ecol., 1981, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 489–518.Google Scholar
  12. Gol'tsman, M.E., Popov, S.V., Chabovskii, A.V., and Borisova, N.G., Sociality Syndrome. Comparative Study of Gerbil Behavior, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1994, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 49–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gromov, V.S. and Popov, S.V., Specific Spatial-Ethological Structure of Mongolian Gerbil Settlements and Attempts to Affect it by Drugs, Zool. Zh.,1979, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1528–1535.Google Scholar
  14. Gromov, V.S., Social Structure of Family Groups of Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguisulatus) in Natural Settlements, Zool. Zh., 1981, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1683–1694.Google Scholar
  15. Gromov, V.S., Comparative Analysis of Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguisulatus) Behavior in Captivity and in Natural Populations, Zool. Zh., 1997, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1344–1355.Google Scholar
  16. Krebs, C.J., Current Paradigms of Rodent Population Dynamics-What We Are Missing? Ecological Based Rodent Management, Singelton, G., Hinds, J., Jeirs, H., and Zhang, Z., Eds., Canberra: Australian Center for Int. Agricult. Res., 1999, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
  17. Krebs, C.J., Bedfield, J.A., and Taitt, M.J., A Pulsed-Removal Experiment on the Vole Microtus townsendii, Can. J. Zool., 1978, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2253–2262.Google Scholar
  18. Krivolutskii, D.A., Pochvennaya fauna v ekologicheskom kontrole(Soil Fauna in Ecological Control), Moscow: Nauka, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Naumov, N.P., Signal Biological Fields and Their Signifi-cance for Animals, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1973, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 808–817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nikol'skii, A.A., Ecological Aspects of the Notion of Signal Biological Fields in Mammals, Zool. Zh., 2003, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 443–449.Google Scholar
  21. Oliv'e, N.M., The Contribution of Ethology to Development of Sedative Drugs, Simpozium Pamyati V.P. Poshivalova(Symp. in the Memory of V.P. Poshivalov), St. Petersburg, 1997, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
  22. Orlenev, D.P., Replacement of Dominating Forms of Behavior in Pallas' Pika with Artificially Reduced Population, Tez. Dokladov III S"ezd VTO AN SSSR(Proc. III Conf. VTO Akad. Nauk USSR), Moscow, 1982, vol. 2, p. 156.Google Scholar
  23. Orlenev, D.P., Spatial-Ethological Structure of Mongolian Gerbil Population in the Norm and after Forced Population Decline, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: MGU, 1987.Google Scholar
  24. Orlenev, D.P. and Kaidun, I.A., Factors of Reproductive Activity of Mongolian Gerbils in Artificially Reduced Populations, V S"ezd VTO AN SSSR, (V Conf. VTO Akad. Nauk USSR), Moscow 1990, vol. 2, pp. 191–192.Google Scholar
  25. Orlenev, D.P. and Pereladov, S.V., Population Structure Recovery in Mongolian Gerbil after Forced Population Decline, Ekologiya,1981, no. 2, pp. 58–66.Google Scholar
  26. Orlenev, D.P., Derviz, D.G., Telitsyna, A.Yu., and Savinetskii, A.B., Behavior of Pallas' Pika Invading Empty Area, Zool. Zh., 1982, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 307–311.Google Scholar
  27. Panov, E.N., Povedenie zhivotnykh i etologicheskaya struktura populyatsii, (Animal Behavior and Ethological Structure of Populations), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. Popov, S.V., The Pattern of Intraspecific Relations in Three Gerbils of MerionesGenus, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1988.Google Scholar
  29. Popov, S.V., Chabovskii, A.V., Shilova, CS.A., and Shchipanov, N.A., Mechanisms of Formation of Territorial-Ecological Structure of Colonies of M. meridianusin the Norm and after Artificial Reduction of Its Abundance, Fauna and Ecology of Rodents, 1989, no. 17, pp. 5–58.Google Scholar
  30. Shatunovskii, M.I. and Shilova, S.A., Certain Approaches to the Problem of Technogenic Catastrophes and Biological Systems, Uspekhi Sovrem. Biol., 1995, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 517–525.Google Scholar
  31. Poshivalov, V.P., Pharmacoethological Analysis of the Action of beta-Carbolines, Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med., 1985, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 323–325.Google Scholar
  32. Shchipanov, N.A., Some Aspects of Resistance of Small Mammals, Uspekhi Sovrem. Biol., 2000, no. 1, pp. 73–87.Google Scholar
  33. Shchipanov, N.A., Ekologicheskie osnovy upravleniya chislennost'yu melkikh mlekopitayushchikh. Izbrannye lektsii(Ecological Bases of Population Control of Small Mammals. Selected Lectures), Moscow: MZ RF, 2001.Google Scholar
  34. Shchipanov, N.A. and Kasatkin, M.V., Social Vole (Misrotus sosialis) in Altered Landscape of Southern Dagestan: A Population Aspect of Survaval, Zool. Zh., 1996, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1412–1425.Google Scholar
  35. Shekarova, O.N., Population Ecology of Red spiny rat Maxomys suriferMiller, 1900), Southern Vietnam, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1998.Google Scholar
  36. Shilova, S.A., Ecological Consequences of Disturbances in the Population Structure of Small Mammals, Bioindication of chemical and radioactive pollution, Moscow: Mir, 1990, pp. 107–129.Google Scholar
  37. Shilova, S.A., Population Control of Small Mammals, Struktura populyatsii mlekopitayushchikh(Structure of Mammalian Populations), Moscow: Nauka, 1991, pp. 173–204.Google Scholar
  38. Shilova, S.A., Population Ecology as a Basis of Population Control of Small Mammals, Moscow: Nauka, 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Shilova, S.A., Population Structure of Mammals under Anthropogenic Load, Uspekhi Sovrem. Biol.,1999, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 487–503.Google Scholar
  40. Shilova, S.A., Popov, S.V., and Chabovskii, A.V., Behavioral Aspect of Optimal population Recovery in Rodents, Povedenie zhivotnykh v soobshchestve(Animal Behavior in Communities), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  41. Shilova, S.A., Chabovskii, A.V., Isaev, S.I., and Neronov, V.V., Dynamics of Rodent Community and Populations in Kalmyk Semideserts under Decreasing Pasture Load and Increasing Humidity, Izv. Acad. Nauk, Ser. Biol., 2000, no. 3, pp. 332–344.Google Scholar
  42. Shilova, S.A., Chabovskii, A.V., Isaev, S.I., and Neronov, V.V., The Dynamics of Population Ecosystems in Kalmykia with Released Anthropogenic Stress, Ekologicheskie protsessy v aridnykh biogeotsenozakh(Ecological Processes in Arid Biocenoses), Moscow, 2001, pp. 9–56.Google Scholar
  43. Simpson, M. and Boutin, S., Muscrat Ondatra zibethinusPopulation Responses to Harvest on the Old Crow Flats Yukon, Can. Field-Natur., 1989, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 420–422.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, M.H., Maza, B.G., and Wiener, J.G., Social Interactions and Spatial Distribution in a Desert Rodent, J. Mammal.,1980, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 113–116.Google Scholar
  45. Sokolov, V.E. and Gromov, V.S., Novelty as a Factor and Scent Marking of Territory by Gerbils, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,1998, vol. 358, no. 6, pp. 850–852.Google Scholar
  46. Tarasov, P.P., On the Ecology of Pallas' Pika, Byul. MOIP, Otd. Biol., 1950, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
  47. Theory and Practice of Rodent Pest Management,Wang, Z. and Zhang, Z., Eds., Beijing: Science Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  48. Vessey, S., Effect of Cloropromasine on Aggression in Laboratory Population of Wild House Mice, Ecology, 1967, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 367–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Welch, B.L. and Welch, A.S., Differential Effect of Chronic Grouping and Isolation on the Metabolism of Brain Amines, Fed. Proc.,1966, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 623.Google Scholar
  50. Westing, A.N., Ecological Consequence of the Second Indochina War, Stockholm: Sipri, 1976.Google Scholar
  51. Yakovlev, A.A. and Babich, N.V.,Population Control of Rodents in Modern Agriculture of Russia,Teriofauna Rossii i Sopredel'nykh Territorii. VII S"ezd VTO RAN(Theriofauna of Russia and Neighboring Areas. VII Conf. VTO Ross. Akad. Nauk),2003, p.397.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Shilova
    • 1
  • D. P. Orlenev
    • 1
  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations