Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 75–99 | Cite as

On the Incorporation of the Effect of Crustal Structure into Empirical Strong Ground Motion Estimation

  • J. Douglas
  • P. Suhadolc
  • G. Costa
Article

Abstract

This article has two purposes. Firstly, a validation exercise of the modal summation technique for the computation of synthetic strong-motion records is performed for two regions of Europe (Umbria-Marche and south Iceland), using a variety of region specific crustal structure models, by comparing the predicted ground motion amplitudes with observed motions. It is found that the rate of decay of ground motions is well predicted by the theoretical decay curves but that the absolute size of the ground motions is underpredicted by the synthetic time-histories. This is thought to be due to the presence of low-velocity surface layers that amplify the ground motions but are not included in the crustal structure models used to compute the synthetic time-histories.

Secondly, a new distance metric based on the computed theoretical decay curves is introduced which should have the ability to model the complex decay of strong ground motions. The ability of this new distance metric to reduce the associated scatter in empirically derived equations for the estimation of strong ground motions is tested. It is found that it does not lead to a reduction in the scatter but this is thought to be due to the use of crustal structure models that are not accurate or detailed enough for the regions studied.

attenuation relations crustal structure modal summation strong ground motion estimation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson, N.A. and Silva W.J. (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 94–127.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, A., Azzara, R., Chiarabba, C., Cimini, G.B., Cocco, M., Di Bona, M., Margheriti, L., Mazza, S., Mele, F., Selvaggi, G., Basili, A. Boschi, E., Courboulex, F., Deschamps, A., Gaffet, S., Bittarelli, G., Chiaraluce, L., Piccinini, D. and Ripepe, M. (1998) The 1997 Umbria-Marche, Italy, earthquake sequence: A first look at the main shocks and aftershocks. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(15), 2861–2864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambraseys, N., Smit, P., Sigbjörnsson, R., Suhadolc, P. and Margaris, B. (2002) Internet-Site for European Strong Motion Data. http://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk. European Commission, Directorate-General XII, Environmental and Climate Programme, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  4. Ambraseys, N.N., Simpson, K.A. and Bommer, J.J. (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(4), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjarnason, I., Menke, W., FlÓvenz, Ó.G. and Caress, D. (1993) Tomographic image of the mid-Atlantic plate boundary in southwestern Iceland. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 6607–6622.Google Scholar
  6. Bommer, J.J., Douglas, J. and Strasser, F.O. (2003) Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1(2), 171–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boore, D.M. and Joyner, W.B. (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87(2), 327–341.Google Scholar
  8. Boore, D.M. and Page, R.A. (1972) Accelerations near faulting in moderate-sized earthquakes.Open-file report. U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  9. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B. and Fumal, T.E. 1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 128–153.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, K.W. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2003) Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(1), 314–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattaneo, M., Augliera, P., De Luca, G., Gorini, A., Govoni, A., Marcucci, S., Michelini, A., Monachesi, G., Spallarossa, D., Trojani, L. and XGUMS (2000) The 1997 Umbria-Marche (Italy) earthquake sequence: Analysis of the data recorded by the local and temporary networks. Journal of Seismology, 4(4), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chimera, G., Aoudia, A., Saraó, A. and Panza, G.F. (2003) Active tectonics in central Italy: Constraints from surface wave tomography and source moment tensor inversion. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 138, 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cocco, M. and Rovelli, A. 1989. Evidence for the variation of stress drop beteen normal and thrust faulting eartquakes in Italy. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94(B7), 9399–9416.Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, J. (2003 Aug) A note on the use of strong-motion data from small magnitude earthquakes for empirical ground motion estimation. In: Skopje Earthquake 40 Years of European Earthquake Engineering (SE-40EEE) . Google Scholar
  15. Douglas, J. and Smit, P.M. (2001) How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(6), 1917–1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du, Z. (1997) Applicazione della sintesi multimodale all'inversione di forme d'onda.Ph.D. thesis, University of Trieste, Italy.Google Scholar
  17. Du, Z.J., Michelini, A. and Panza, G.F. 1998. EurID: a regionalized 3-D seismological model of Europe. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 105, 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Florsch, N., Fäh, D., Suhadolc, P. and Pnaza G.F. (1991) Complete synthetic seismograms from high-frequency multimode SH-waves. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 136, 526–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankel, A., McGarr, A. Bicknell, J., Mori, J., Seeber, L. and Cranswick, E. (1990) Attenuation of high-frequency shear waves in the crust. Measurements from New York State, South Africa, and southern California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B11), 17441–17457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gusev, A.A. 1983. Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short-period strong motion. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 74, 787–808.Google Scholar
  21. Harvard Seismology (2003) CMT Catalog Search.On Internet at http://www.seismology.harvard.edu/CMTsearch.html. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Department of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  22. International Seismological Centre (2002) On-line Bulletin. http://www.isc.ac.uk/Bull. International Seismological Centre, Thatcham, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  23. Joyner, W.B. and Boore, D.M. (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71(6), 2011–2038.Google Scholar
  24. Laske, G., Dziewonski, A. and Masters, G. (2003 Nov) The Reference Earth Model website.On Internet at: http://mahi.ucsd.edu/Gabi/rem.html.Google Scholar
  25. Marra, F., Azzara R. Bellucci, F., Caserta, A., Cultrera, G., Mele, G., Palombo, B., Rovelli, A. and Boschi, E. (2000) Large amplification of ground motion at rock sites within a fault zone in Nocera Umbra (central Italy). Journal of Seismology, 4(4), 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mooney, W.D., Laske, G. and Masters, T.G. (1998) CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5º × 5º. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(B1), 727–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morelli, A., Ekström, G. and Olivieri, M. (2000) Source properties of the 1997-1998 central Italy earthquake sequence from inversion of long-period and broad-band seismograms. Journal of Seismology, 4(4), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohno, S., Ohta, T., Ikeura, T. and Takemura, M. (1993) Revision of attenuation formula considering the effect of fault size to evaluate strong motion spectra in near field. Tectonophysics, 218, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Panza, G.F. (1985) Synthetic seismograms: The Rayleigh waves modal summation. Journal of Geophysics, 58, 125–145.Google Scholar
  30. Panza, G.F. and Suhadolc, P. (1987) Complete strong motion synthetics. Pages 153–204 of:Bolt, B.A. (ed.), Seismic strong motion synthetics. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pondrelli, S., Morelli, A., Ekstrom, G., Mazza, S., Boschi, E. and Dziewonski, A.M. (2002) European-Mediterranean regional centroid-moment tensors: 1997-2000. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 130, 71–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rögnvaldsson, S.Th. and Slunga, R. (1993) Routine fault plane solutions for local networks: A test with synthetic data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83(4), 1232–1247.Google Scholar
  33. Servizio Sismico Nazionale-Monitoring System Group (2002). The Umbria-Marche strong motion data set (September 1997-June 1998) CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  34. Somerville, P.G., McLaren, J.P., Saikia, C.K. and Helmberger, D.V. (1990) The 25 November 1988 Saguenay, Quebec, earthquake: Source parameters and the attenuation of strong ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 80(5), 1118–1143.Google Scholar
  35. Stefánsson, R. (2002) E-mail message received 17/10/2002.Google Scholar
  36. Suhadolc, P. and Chiaruttini, C. (1987) A theoretical study of the dependence of the peak ground acceleration on source and structure parameters. Pages 143-183 of: Erdik, M.O. and Toksöz, M.N. (eds), Strong ground motion seismology. D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  37. Trifunac, M.D. (1976) Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of earthquake magnitude, source-to-station distance, and recording site conditions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66(4), 1343–1373.Google Scholar
  38. Trifunac, M.D. and Brady A.G. (1976) Correlations of peak acceleration, velocity and displacement with earthquake magnitude, distance and site conditions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 4(5), 455–471.Google Scholar
  39. Wessel, P. and Smith, W.H.F. (1991) Free software helps map and display data. EOS Transactions AGU, 72, 441.Google Scholar
  40. Westaway, R. and Smith, R.B. (1989) Strong ground motion in normal-faulting earthquakes. Geophysical Journal, 96(3), 529–559.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Douglas
    • 1
  • P. Suhadolc
    • 2
  • G. Costa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil & Environmental EngineeringImperial College LondonSouth Kensington Campus,LondonUK
  2. 2.Universitá degli studi di TriesteDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Via E. Weiss 1TriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations