Advertisement

Autonomous Robots

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 143–163 | Cite as

The MANUS-HAND Dextrous Robotics Upper Limb Prosthesis: Mechanical and Manipulation Aspects

  • J.L. Pons
  • E. Rocon
  • R. Ceres
  • D. Reynaerts
  • B. Saro
  • S. Levin
  • W. Van Moorleghem
Article

Abstract

Dextrous artificial hand design and manipulation is an active research topic. A very interesting practical application is the field of upper limb prosthetics. This paper presents the mechanical design and manipulation aspects of the MANUS-HAND project to develop a multifunctional upper limb prosthesis. The kinematics of our design makes use of the so-called underactuated principle and leads to an innovative design that triples the performance of currently existing commercial hand prosthesis. In addition, the thumb design allows its positioning both in flexion and opposition. As a consequence, up to four grasping modes (cylindrical, precision, hook and lateral) are available with just two actuators.

The proposed impedance control approach allows the fingers to behave as virtual springs. Given the difficulty of including the user in the control loop, this approach is based on an autonomous coordination and control of the grasp. As a consequence, the requirements on the Human Machine interface are reduced. At the end of the paper, we briefly describe the clinical trials that were set up for evaluation purposes.

dextrous hands prosthetic hands EMG control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buterfass, J., Hirzinger, G., Knoch, S., and Liu, H. 1998. DLR's multisensory articulated hand, Part I: Hard-and software architecture. In Proc. of the 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pp. 2081-2086.Google Scholar
  2. Chan, F.H.Y., Yang, Y.-S., Lam, F.K., Zhang, Y.-T., and Parker, P.A. 2000. Fuzzy EMG classification for prosthesis control. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 8(3):305-311.Google Scholar
  3. Dixon, J.R. and Poli, C. 1995. Engineering Design and Design for Manufacturing, Field Stone Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Han, J., Song, W., Kim, J., Bang, W., Lee, H., and Zenn Bien, Z. 2000. New EMG pattern recognition based on soft computing techniques and its application to control of a rehabilitation robotic arm. In Proc. of 6th International Conference on Soft Computing (IIZUKA2000), Iizuka, Japan, pp. 890-897.Google Scholar
  5. Hirose, S. and Umetani, Y. 1977. The development of a soft gripper for the versatile robot hand. In Proc. 7th Symp. Industrial Robots, pp. 353-360.Google Scholar
  6. Hollerbach, J.M. 1982. Workshop on the design and control of dexterous hands, MIT-AI Memo No. 661.Google Scholar
  7. Kyberd, P.J. and Chappel, P.H. 1994. The Southampton hand: An intelligent myoelectric prosthesis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 31(4):326-334.Google Scholar
  8. Kyberd, P.J., Evans, M., and te Winkel, S. 1998. An intelligent anthropomorphic hand, with automatic grasp Robotica, 16:531-536.Google Scholar
  9. Kyberd, P.J. and Pons, J.L. 2003. A comparison of the Oxford and Manus intelligent hand prostheses. In Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 12-17.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, H., Meusel, P., Buterfass, J., and Hirzinger, G. 1998. DLR's multisensory articulated hand, Part II: The parallel torque/position cintrol system. In Proc. of the 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics & Automation, pp. 2087-2093.Google Scholar
  11. Mason, M.T. and Salisbury, J.K. 1985. Robot Hands And the Mechanics of Manipulation, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Otto Bock System Electric Hand, 647H326, Nov. 2001, Otto Bock, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. Pfeiffer, F. Grasping with hydraulic fingers-An example of mechatronics IEEE/ASME Transaction on Mechatronics, 1:158-167.Google Scholar
  14. Pons, J.L., Ceres, R., and Pfeiffer, F. 1999. Multifingered dextrous robotics hand design and control: A review. Robotica, 19:661-674.Google Scholar
  15. Pons, J.L., Ceres, R., Reynaerts, D., Saro, B., Levin, S., and Van Moorleghem, D. 2001. MANUS, a global approach to upper limb multifunctional prosthetics. Part I: Objectives, approach and results of the prosthesis prototype. Submitted to Medicine Engineering & Physics.Google Scholar
  16. Pons, J.L., Ceres, R., Levin, S., Markovitz, I., Saro, B., Reynaerts, D., and Van Moorleghem, D. 2001. MANUS, a global approach to upper limb multifunctional prosthetics. Part II: Virtual Reality training platform and EMG management. Submitted to Medicine Engineering & Physics.Google Scholar
  17. Reynaerts, D. 1995. Control methods and actuation technology for whole-hand dexterous manipulation. Ph.D. Thesis, PMA, Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven.Google Scholar
  18. Schlesinger, G. 1996. Der mechanische aufbau der künstlichen glieder. In Ersatzglieder und Arbeitshilfen fur Kriegsbeschadigte und Unfallverletzte, Borchrdt et al. (Eds.), Springer, pp. 361-699.Google Scholar
  19. Shimoga, K.B. 1996. Robot grasp synthesis algorithms: A survey. Int. Journal of Robotics Research, 15(3):230-266.Google Scholar
  20. Van Brussel, H., Santoso, B., and Reynaerts, D. 1989. Design and control of a multi-fingered robot hand provided with tactile feedback. In Proc. NASA Conf. on Space Telerobotics, Pasadena, pp. 3.89-3.101.Google Scholar
  21. Vinet, R., Lozac'h, Y., Beaudry, N., and Drouin, G. 1995. Design methodology for a multifunctional hand prosthesis. J. of Rehab. Res. and Development, 32(4):316-324.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.L. Pons
  • E. Rocon
  • R. Ceres
  • D. Reynaerts
  • B. Saro
  • S. Levin
  • W. Van Moorleghem

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations