Birth Order in Sex-Offending and Aggressive-Offending Men
- 170 Downloads
The relation between birth order and number of sexual and violent convictions was investigated retrospectively in a sample of 113 men, to determine whether the established fraternal birth order effect in male homosexual preference and deviant sexual preference (e.g., for rape and pedophilia) may be extended to sexual behavior. Participants were mentally disordered offenders detained in a medium secure psychiatric unit in the United Kingdom and comprised 64 men with sexual convictions and 49 men with nonsexual violent convictions. Sibling data from psychiatric notes were used to calculate Berglin's birth order index for each participant and conviction data were obtained from the Home Office Offenders' Index. Fraternal birth order was significantly correlated with number of sexual convictions (p ≤ .05). No association was found between fraternal or sororal birth order and violent convictions in either the sex offender or violent offender group. Results suggest that the fraternal birth order effect previously found for deviant sexual preference in sex offenders (K. Côté, C. M. Earls, & M. L. Lalumière, 2002; M. L. Lalumière, G. T. Harris, V. L. Quinsey, & M. E. Rice, 1998) also applies to sexually deviant behavior and is specific to sexual rather than general offending. Results are discussed in terms of the maternal immunosensitization hypothesis.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1996a). Biodemographic comparisons of homosexual and heterosexual men in the Kinsey interview data. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 551–579.Google Scholar
- Blanchard, R., & Bogaert, A. F. (1998). Birth order in homosexual versus heterosexual sex offenders against children, pubescents and adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 595–603.Google Scholar
- Côté, K., Earls, C. M., & Lalumière, M. L. (2002). Birth order, birth interval, and deviant sexual preferences among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 67–81.Google Scholar
- Ellis, L., & Ames, M. A. (1987). Neurohormonal functioning and sexual orientation: A theory of homosexuality–heterosexuality. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 233–258.Google Scholar
- Ellis, L., & Blanchard, R. (2001). Birth order, sibling sex ratio, and maternal miscarriages in homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 543–552.Google Scholar
- Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Howitt, D. (1995). Pedophiles and sexual offences against children. Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (1998). Sexual deviance and number of older brothers among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 5–15.Google Scholar
- Lalumière, M. L., Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., Coleman, G., & Càtà, K. (2000). Birth order and rape. Paper presented at the Annual Forensic Day of the University of Toronto, Penetanguishene, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
- MacCulloch, M. J., & Waddington, J. L. (1981). Neuroendocrine mechanisms and the aetiology of male and female homosexuality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 341–345.Google Scholar
- Quinsey, V. L., & Lalumière, M. L. (1995). Evolutionary perspectives on sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 301–315.Google Scholar
- Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 85–105.Google Scholar