Argumentation

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 61–94 | Cite as

Rejecting the Urge to Theorise in Fallacy Inquiry

  • Louise Cummings
Article

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the incessant call to theory that is evident in fallacy inquiry. I relate the motivations for this call to a desire to attain for fallacy inquiry certain attributes of the theoretical process in scientific inquiry. I argue that these same attributes, when pursued in the context of philosophical inquiry in general and fallacy inquiry in particular, lead to the assumption of a metaphysical standpoint. This standpoint, I contend, is generative of unintelligibility in philosophical discussions of rationality. I claim that this same unintelligibility can be shown to characterise fallacy inquiry, an example of the study of argumentative rationality. The context for my claim is an examination of the theoretical pronouncements of two prominent fallacy theorists, John Woods and Douglas Walton, in relation to the argument from ignorance fallacy. My conclusion takes the form of guidelines for the post-theoretical pursuit of fallacy inquiry.

argument from ignorance John Woods and Douglas Walton metaphysical standpoint monolectical/dialectical reasoning Nicholas Rescher rationality theorising unintelligibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Biro, J. I.: 1977, 'Rescuing 'Begging the Question”', Metaphilosophy 8(4), 257–271.Google Scholar
  2. Blair, J. A. and Johnson, R. H.: 1987, 'Argumentation as Dialectical', Argumentation 1, 41–56.Google Scholar
  3. Carbonell, J. R. and Collins, A. M.: 1973, 'Natural Semantics in Artificial Intelligence', Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1973, 344–351.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, P.: 1949, 'Russell's Doubts about Induction', Mind 58, 141–163.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, W. R.: 1987, 'Technical Logic, Rhetorical Logic, and Narrative Rationality', Argumentation 1, 3–21.Google Scholar
  6. Grootendorst, R.: 1986, 'Some Fallacies about Fallacies', in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline, Foris Publications, Dordrecht-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  8. Hintikka, J.: 1987, 'The Fallacy of Fallacies', Argumentation 1, 211–238.Google Scholar
  9. Levi, D. S.: 1994, 'Begging What is at Issue in the Argument', Argumentation 8, 265–282.Google Scholar
  10. Rescher, N.: 1980, Scepticism: A Critical Reappraisal, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Rescher, N.: 1988, Rationality: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Ryle, G.: 1966, Plato's Progress, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Tarski, A.: 1965, Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Van Eemeren, F. H. and Grootendorst, R.: 1995, 'The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Fallacies', in H. V. Hansen and R. C. Pinto (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  15. Walton, D. N.: 1987, Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Walton, D. N., 1990, 'What is Reasoning? What is an Argument?', The Journal of Philosophy 87, 399–419.Google Scholar
  17. Walton, D. N.: 1992, 'Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance', American Philosophical Quarterly 29(4), 381–387.Google Scholar
  18. Walton, D. N.: 1996, Arguments from Ignorance, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology, and Religious Belief. University of California Press. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  20. Woods, J. and Walton, D. N.: 1978, 'The Fallacy of “Ad Ignorantiam”', Dialectica 32(2), 87–99.Google Scholar
  21. Woods, J. and Walton, D. N.: 1982, Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louise Cummings
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Ulster at ColeraineCounty Londonderry, Northern IrelandU.K

Personalised recommendations