Advertisement

Aquaculture International

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 517–530 | Cite as

Sustainable aquaculture: developing the promise of aquaculture

  • Anamarija Frankic
  • Carl Hershner
Article

Abstract

As experience with aquaculture grows worldwide, the concept of sustainable aquaculture is increasingly recognized to incorporate both spatial and temporal dimensions of environmental, economic, and social parameters. Practitioners have discovered that sustainable aquaculture must not only maximize benefits, but also minimize accumulation of detriments, as well as other types of negative impacts on natural and social environment. Therefore, sustainable aquaculture development must be advanced in a manner that is environmentally sustainable and that protects the quality of the environment for other users, while it is equally important for society to protect the quality of the environment for aquaculture. This paper provides a brief review of the worldwide aquaculture development in the last decade, and gives a few examples of sustainable aquaculture activities in the coastal areas that are using natural coastal habitats and ecosystems. Based on already existing national and international efforts to promote sustainable aquaculture, key recommendations are provided, including what should be the next proactive steps.

Ecosystem integrity Environmental impacts Integrated coastal management Polyculture Socio-economic impacts Sustainable aquaculture Sustainable development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binh C.T., Phillips M.J. and Demaine H. 1997. Integrated shrimps–mangrove farming systems in the Mekong delta of Vietnam. Aquacult. Res. 28: 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks K.M., Mahnken C. and Nash C. 2002. Environmental effects associated with marine netpen waste with emphasis on salmon farming in the Pacific Northwest. In: Stickney R.R. and McVey J.P. (eds) Responsible Marine Aquaculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Caddy J.F. and Griffiths R.C. 1995. Living marine resources and their sustainable development. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 353, p. 167.Google Scholar
  4. Chan G.L. 1993. Aquaculture, ecological engineering: lessons from China. Ambio 22(7): 491–494Google Scholar
  5. Chang W.T.B. 1987. Fish culture in China. Fisheries 12(3): 11–15Google Scholar
  6. Chua T.E. 1992. Coastal aquaculture development and the environment: the role of coastal area management. Marine Pollut. Bull. 25(1–4): 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cicin-Sain B. (ed) 2000. Development of a policy framework for offshore marine aquaculture in the 3–200 mile US ocean zone. Draft. Center for the Study of Marine Policy, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  8. Costa-Pierce B.A. 1987. Aquaculture in ancient Hawaii. Bioscience 37(5): 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davenport J., Black K., Burnell G., Cross T., Culloty S., Ekaratne S., Furness B., Mulcahy M. and Thetmeyer H. 2003. Aquaculture: The Ecological Issues. British Ecological Society, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (EC) 2002. A strategy for sustainable development of European Aquaculture. COM(2002)511 Final. http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2002/com2002_0511en01.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. FAO 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 41 p.Google Scholar
  12. FAO 1998a. The state ofworld fisheries and aquaculture. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w9900e/w9900e00.htm.Google Scholar
  13. FAO 1998b. Trends in global aquaculture production: 1984–1996. http://www.fao.org/fi/trends/aqtrends/aqtrend.asp.Google Scholar
  14. FAO 1999. Sustainable Aquaculture Development and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries.Google Scholar
  15. FAO 2000a. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2000. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X8002E/X8002E00.htm.Google Scholar
  16. FAO 2000b. Small ponds make a big difference: integrating fish with crop and livestock farming. http://www/fao.org/docrep/003/x7156e/x7156e00.htm#TopOfPage.Google Scholar
  17. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2002. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. http://www.enaca.org/World_Fisheries_Aquaculture_2002.pdf.Google Scholar
  18. Frankic A. 1998. A framework for planning sustainable development in coastal regions: an island pilot project in Croatia. Dissertation. Virginia institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary. http://www.vims.edu/library/Frankic/Frankic.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Frankic A. and Hershner C. 2001. Seafood recipes: balancing aquaculture development with coastal planning. In: International workshop on 'Aquaculture and Its Role in Integrated Coastal Zone Management'. European Aquaculture Society, 19–21 April, Oostende, Belgium.Google Scholar
  20. GESAMP 2001. Protecting the oceans from land based activities. Report 71. http://gesamp.imo.org/no71/index.htm.Google Scholar
  21. Goldburg R. and Triplett T. 1997. Murky Waters: Environmental Effects of Aquaculture in the United States. Environmental Defense Fund.Google Scholar
  22. Hawken P., Lovins A. and Lovins L.H. 2000. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Back Bay Book.Google Scholar
  23. ICLARM 1997. Better nutrition and livelihood for poor farmers through aquaculture. http://www. iclarm.org/reshigh.htm#better.Google Scholar
  24. ICLARM 1999. Research highlights integrated agriculture–aquaculture. http://www.iclarm.org/reshigh99_4.htm.Google Scholar
  25. IUCN 2000. Coastal and Marine Biodiversity: policy recommendations. Fifth Meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice. Montreal, Canada, 31 January–4 February.Google Scholar
  26. Kapetsky J.M., McGregor L. and Nanne H.E. 1987. A geographical information system and satellite remote sensing to plan for aquaculture development: A FAO-UNEP/GRID cooperative study in Costa Rica. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 287, 51 p.Google Scholar
  27. Lem A. and Shehadeh Z.H. 1997. International trade in aquaculture products.FAO Aquaculture Newsletter 17: 3–6.Google Scholar
  28. MARAQUA 1999. http://www.lifesciences.napier.ac.uk/maraqua/Google Scholar
  29. MARAQUA 2001. http://www.biol.napier.ac.uk/maraqua/.Google Scholar
  30. McVey J.P., Stickney R.R., Yarish C. and Choppin T. 2002. Aquatic polyculture and balanced ecosystem management: new paradigms for seafood production. In: Stickney R.R. and McVey J.P. (eds) Responsible Marine Aquaculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  31. MERAMED 2000. http://www.meramed.com/.Google Scholar
  32. Morikawa T. 1999. Sustainable marine aquaculture and stock enhancement in Japan. NOAA Aquaculture Workshop Report, 11–13 August. http://www.lib.noaa.gov/docaqua/FinalAquacultureWorkshopRpt.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. NACA/FAO 2000. Aquaculture development beyond 2000: the Bangkok Declaration and Strategy. Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, 20–25 February, Bangkok, Thailand, 27 p.Google Scholar
  34. NAS (National Academy of Science) 1990. Monitoring and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  35. Naylor R.L., Goldburg R.J. and Primavera J.H. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 409(29).Google Scholar
  36. NRC 2000. Clean Coastal Waters: Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 75 p.Google Scholar
  37. Oregon (CMP) Coastal Management Program 1997. http://www.lcd.state.or.us/coast/ocmpdoc.htm.Google Scholar
  38. PAP/RAC 1996. Approaches for zoning of coastal areas with reference to Mediterranean aquaculture. PAP-10/EAM/GL.1. Split, Croatia.Google Scholar
  39. Pauly D.P., Tyedmers R., Froese and Liu L.Y. 2001. Fishing down and farming up the food web. Conserv. Biol. Practice 2(4): 25.Google Scholar
  40. Power M. and Adams S.M. 1997. Perspectives of the scientific community on the status of ecological risk assessment. Environ. Manage. 21(6): 803–830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sorensen J.C. and West N. 1992. A Guide to Impact Assessment in Coastal Environments. USAID and Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  42. Stickney R.R. and McVey J.P. (eds) 2002. Responsible Marine Aquaculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Tacon A.G.J. 1997. Contribution to food fish supplies. In: Review of the State of the World Aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Cir. #FIRI/C886 (Rev. 1), pp. 17–21.Google Scholar
  44. Treece G.D. 2002. Shrimp farm effluents. In: Stickney R.R. and McVey J.P. (eds), Responsible Marine Aquaculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  45. Watson R. and Pauly D. 2001. Systematic distortions in world fisheries catch trends. Nature 414: 534–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. WB (World Bank) 1998. Sustainable aquaculture. Rural Development Department. No. 22.Google Scholar
  47. Westwood D. in MARAQUA 2001. http://www.biol.napier.ac.uk/maraqua/.Google Scholar
  48. WWI (World Watch Institute) 1998. Rocking the boat: conserving fisheries and protecting jobs. World Watch Institute, Paper 142, by Anne Platt McGinn.Google Scholar
  49. WWI 1999. Safeguarding the health of oceans. World Watch Institute Paper 145, by Anne Platt McGinn.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Coastal Resources ManagementVirginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & MaryGloucester PtUSA

Personalised recommendations