Flow, Turbulence and Combustion

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

Large Eddy Simulation of Premixed Turbulent Combustion Using Ξ Flame Surface Wrinkling Model

  • G. Tabor
  • H.G. Weller
Article

Abstract

One commonly-used method for deriving the RANS equations for multicomponent flow is the technique of conditional averaging. In this paper the concept is extended to LES, by introducing the operations of conditional filtering and surface filtering. Properties of the filtered indicator function \(\bar b\) are investigated mathematically and computationally. These techniques are then used to derive conditionally filtered versions of the Navier–Stokes equations which are appropriate for simulating multicomponent flow in LES. Transport equations for the favre-averaged indicator function \(\bar b\) and the unresolved interface properties (the wrinkling and the surface area per unit volume) are also derived. Since the paper is directed towards modelling premixed combustion in the flamelet regime, closure of the equations is achieved by introducing physical models based on the picture of the flame as a wrinkled surface separating burnt and unburnt components of the fluid. This leads to a set of models for premixed turbulent combustion of varying complexity. The results of applying one of this set of models to propagation of a spherical flame in isotropic homogeneous turbulence are analysed.

Large Eddy Simulation premixed turbulent combustion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelberger, C., Veynante, D., Egolfopoulos, F. and Poinsot, T., Large eddy simulation of combustion instabilities in turbulent premixed flames. In: Proceedings of the Summer Program (1998) pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boger, M., Veynante, D., Boughanern, H. and Trouvé, A., Direct numerical simulation analysis of flame surface density concept for large eddy simulation of turbulent premixed combustion. In: Twenty-Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1988) pp. 917–925.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bourlioux, A., Semi-analytical validation of a dynamic large-eddy simulation procedure for turbulent premixed flames via the G-equation. Combust.Theory Modelling 4 (2000) 363–389.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley, D., Hicks, R.A., Lawes, M. and Sheppard, C.G.W., Final Report, CEC Contract JOU2-CT-92-0162. Technical report, Combustion Research Group, University of Leeds (1996).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley, D., Hicks, R.A., Lawes, M., Sheppard, C.G.W. and Woolley, R., The measurement of laminar burning velocities andMarkstein numbers for iso-octane-air and iso-octane-n-heptaneair mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures in an explosion bomb. Combust.Flame 115 (1998) 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bray, K.N.C., The challenge of turbulent combustion'. In: Twenty-Sixth Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1996) pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butler, T.D. and O'Rourke, P.J., A numerical method for two-dimensional unsteady reacting flows. In: Sixteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1977) pp. 1503–1515.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Candel, S.M. and Poinsot, T.J., Flame stretch and the balance equation for the flame area. Combust.Sci.Technol. 70 (1990) 1–15.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cant, R., Pope, S. and Bray, K., Modelling of flamelet surface-to-volume ratio in turbulent premixed combustion. In: Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1990) pp. 809–815.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D. and Poinsot, T., A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys.Fluids 12(7) (2000) 1843–1863.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dopazo, C., On conditional averages for intermittent turbulent flows. J.Fluid Mech. 81 (1977) 433–438.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fureby, C. and Tabor, G., 1997, Mathematical and physical constraints on large eddy simulations'. Theor.Comput.Fluid Dynam. 9(2) (1997) 75–83.MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fureby, C., Tabor, G., Weller, H. and Gosman, A.D., A comparative study of sub grid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys.Fluids 9(5) (1997) 1416–1429.MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gülder, Ö.L., Turbulent premixed flame propagation models for different combustion regimes. In: Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1990) pp. 743–750.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hawkes, E. and Cant, S., A flame surface density approach to large eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion. Proc.Combust.Inst. 28 (2000) 51–58.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Im, H.G., Lund, T.S. and Ferziger, J.H., Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent front propagation with dynamic subgid bodels. Phys.Fluids 9(12) (1997) 3826–3833.MathSciNetCrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jasak, H., Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College (1996).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jasak, H. and Weller, H.G., Interface tracking capabilities of the inter-gamma differencing scheme. Technical report, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine (1995).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kerstein, A.R., Ashurst, W.T. and Williams, F.A., Field equations for interface propagation in an unsteady homogeneous flowfield. Phys.Rev.A 37 (1988) 2728–2731.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marble, F.E. and Broadwell, J.E., The coherent flame model of chemical reactions. Technical Report TRW-9-PU, Project Squib Rep. (1977).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Menon, S., Simulation and control of combustion instability in a dump combustor. In: Sixth International Conference on Numerical Combustion, New Orleans, Louisiana (1996).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menon, S. and Jou,W.H., Large eddy simulations of combustion instability in an axusymmetric ramjet. Combust.Sci.Technol. 75 (1991) 53.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nwagwe, I.K., Weller, H.G., Tabor, G., Gosman, A.D., Lawes, M., Sheppard, C.G.W. and Wooley, R., Measurements and large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed flame kernel growth. Proc.Combust.Inst. 28 (2000) 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peters, N., Wenzel, H. and Williams, F.A., 2000, ‘Modification of the turbulent burning velocity by gas expansion. Proc.Combust.Inst. 28 (2000) 235–243.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pitz, R.W. and Daily, J.W., Combustion in a turbulent mixing layer formed at a rearward-facing step. AIAA J. 21 (1983) 1565–1570.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Poinsot, T.J., Veynante, D. and Candel, S., Quenching processes and premixed turbulent combustion diagrams. J.Fluid Mech. 228 (1991) 561–606.ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pope, S.B., The evolution of surfaces in turbulence. Internat.J.Engrg.Sci. 26(5) (1988) 445–469.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schroeder, W., Martin, K. and Lorensen, W., The Visualisation Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3d Graphics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1997).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shewchuk, J.R., http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ quake/triangle.html.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shewchuk, J.R., Triangle: Engineering a 2D quality mesh generator and Delaunay triangulator. In: First Workshop on Applied Computational Geometry, Philadelphia, PA (1996) pp. 124–133.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spalding, D.B., ‘Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames. In: Thirteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1970) pp. 649–657.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tabor, G., Nwagwe, I.K., Weller, H. and Gosman, A.D., Visualisation of results from LES of combustion. J.Vis. 2(2) (1999) 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vervisch, L., Bidaux, E., Bray, K. and Kollmann, W., Surface density function in premixed turbulent combustion modelling, similarities between probability density function and flame surface approach. Phys.Fluids 7(10) (1995) 2496–2503.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weller, H., The development of a new flame area combustion model using conditional averaging. Thermo-Fluids Section Report TF 9307, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine (1993).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Weller, H., Uslu, S., Gosman, A., Maly, R., Herweg, R. and Heel, B., Prediction of combustion in homogeneous-charge spark-ignition Engines. In: International Symposium COMODIA 94 (1994) pp. 163–169.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weller, H.G., Marooney, C.J. and Gosman, A.D., A new spectral method for calculation of the time-varying area of a laminar flame in homogeneous turbulence. In: Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1990) pp. 629–636.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weller, H.G., Tabor, G., Gosman, A.D. and Fureby, C., Application of a flame-wrinkling LES combustion model to a turbulent mixing layer. In: Twenty-Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1998) pp. 899–907.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Tabor
    • 1
  • H.G. Weller
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, Harrison BuildingUniversity of ExeterExeterU.K.
  2. 2.Nabla Ltd.The Mews, Picketts LodgePicketts Lane, Salfords, SurreyU.K

Personalised recommendations