Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 30, Issue 1–3, pp 203–213 | Cite as

Coffee Ringspot Virus Vectored by Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) in Coffee

  • C.M. ChagasEmail author
  • E.W. Kitajima
  • J.C.V. Rodrigues


Coffee ringspot is characterized by conspicuous ringspot symptoms on leaves, berries, and less frequently on twigs. It is caused by coffee ringspot virus (CoRSV), a short, bacilliform virus (40 nm × 100–110 nm). The virus is not seed borne and is transmitted by Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes). Transovarial transmission within the mite does not occur. CoRSV has been mechanically transmitted to Chenopodium amaranticolor Coste and Reynaud, C. quinoa Wildenow, Beta vulgaris L., and Alternanthera tenella Colla resulting in local lesions. Systemic infection within both C. amaranticolor and C. quinoa occurs. Virions are found in the nucleus or cytoplasm of infected cells, commonly associated with membranes. Occasionally, membrane bounded particles are found within the cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum. A characteristic electron lucent, nuclear inclusion is commonly found in many infected cells. These cytopathic effects place CoRSV among the nuclear type of Brevipalpus-borne viruses. The disease has been reported in several Brazilian states (São Paulo, Paraná, Minas Gerais, and Federal District) and recently found in Costa Rica. A similar disease is known in the Philippines, but no information exists about its relationship to CoRSV. Coffee ringspot had no economical significance until recently when a large scale infection was reported in Minas Gerais that resulted in yield loss.

Brevipalpus phoenicis Coffea sp. coffee ringspot virus cytopathic effects natural and experimental virus transmission 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bitancourt, A.A. 1938. A mancha anular, uma nova doença do cafeeiro. O Biológico 4: 404–405.Google Scholar
  2. Bitancourt, A.A. 1939. Lesões nas frutas da mancha anular do cafeeiro. O Biológico 4: 53–54.Google Scholar
  3. Branquinho, W.G., Cupertino, F.P., Takatsu, A., Kitajima, E.W. and Boiteux, L.S. 1988. Doenças que afetam plantios de café e de mandioca no Distrito Federal. Fitopatol. Bras. 13: 140 (abstract).Google Scholar
  4. Carvalho, C.M. and Figueira, A.R. 1998a. Alternanthera tenella as a potential wild host for coffee ringspot virus. Virus Res. Rev. 3(1): 146 (abstract).Google Scholar
  5. Carvalho, C.M. and Figueira, A.R. 1998b. Isolados atuais da mancha anular do cafeeiro invadem sisemicamente hospdeiras experimentais. Fitopatol. Bras. 23: 314 (abstract).Google Scholar
  6. Chagas, C.M. 1978. Mancha anular do cafeeiro: transmissibilidade, identificação do vetor e aspectos anatomo-patológicas da espécie Coffea arabica L. afetada pela moléstia. PhD Thesis, São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, 132 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Chagas, C.M. 1980. Morphology and intracellular behaviour of coffee ringspot virus (CRV) in tissues of coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Phytopathol. Z. 99: 301–309.Google Scholar
  8. Chagas, C.M. and Rossetti, V. 1982. Novos aspectos sobre a transmissibilidade da leprose dos citros. Fitopatol. Bras. 7: 536 (abstract).Google Scholar
  9. Chagas, C.M., July, J.R. and Alba, A.P.C. 1981. Mechanical transmission and structural features of coffee ringspot virus (CRV). Phytopathol. Z. 102: 100–106.Google Scholar
  10. Figueira, A.R., Reis, P.R., Carvalho, V.I. and Pinto, A.C.S. 1995. Vírus da mancha anular do cafeeiro tem causado prejuízos relevantes. Fitopatol. Bras. 20: 299 (abstract).Google Scholar
  11. Figueira, A.R., Paseto, L.A. and Carvalho, C.M. 1998. A disseminação do vírus da mancha anular do cafeeiro em Minas Gerais tem aumentado acima das expectativas. Fitopatol. Bras. 23: 317 (abstract).Google Scholar
  12. Figueira, A.R., Carvalho, C.M., Boari, A.J. and Nogueira, N.L. 1999. Studies on the Brazilian coffee ringspot virus using RT-PCR with random primers and electron microscopy. Virus Res. Rev. 4(1): 152 (abstract).Google Scholar
  13. Flechtmann, C.H.W. 1981. Ácaros de Importância Agrícola. Livraría Nobel S.A., São Paulo.Google Scholar
  14. Juliatti, F.C., Báo, S.N., AraÚjo, A.C.G., Kitajima, E.W., Neves, J.B. and Peixoto, J.R. 1995. Mancha anular do cafeeiro: etiologia viral e danos em lavouras da região de Araguarí. Fitopatol. Bras. 20: 337 (abstract).Google Scholar
  15. Kitajima, E.W. 2001. Brevipalpus-mite transmitted plant viruses. In: Proc. 11th Congr. Mediterranean Union of Phytopathology and 3rd Congress of the Sociedade Portuguesa de Fitopatologia, Oeiras, Portugal, 16–20 September 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Kitajima, E.W. and Costa, A.S. 1972. Partículas baciliformes associadas à mancha anular do cafeeiro. Ciência e Cultura 24: 542–545.Google Scholar
  17. Kitajima, E.W., Chagas, C.M. and Rodrigues, J.C.V. 2003. Brevipalpus-transmitted plant virus and virus-like diseases: reports of some recent cases and cytopathology. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 30: 135–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nogueira, N.L., Figueira, A.R., Mort, A.E. and Boari, A.J. 2000. Comprovação da infecção sistêmica do Chenopodium quinoa por vírus da mancha anular do cafeeiro (CoRSV) através de microscopia eletrônica. Fitopatol. Bras. 25: 446 (abstract).Google Scholar
  19. Reyes, T.T. 1959. Ringspot of coffee in the Philippines. FAO Plant Bull. 8: 11–12.Google Scholar
  20. Rodrigues, J.C.V. and Nogueira, N.L. 2001. Ocorrência da mancha anular do cafeeiro no Estado do Paraná e sobrevivência do inóculo à geada. Fitopatol. Bras. 26: 513 (abstract).Google Scholar
  21. Rodrigues, J.C.V., Rodriguez, C.M., Moreira, L., Villalobos, W., Rivera, C. and Childers, C.C. 2002. Occurrence of coffee ringspot virus, a Brevipalpus mite-borne virus in coffee in Costa Rica, Central America.Google Scholar
  22. Rodrigues, J.C.V., Kitajima, E.W., Childers, C.C. and Chagas, C.M. 2003. Citrus leprosis virus vectored by Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) in citrus in Brazil. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 30: 161–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rossetti, V., Colariccio, A., Chagas, C.M., Sato, M.E. and Raga, A. 1997. Leprose dos citros. Bol. Téc. Inst. Biol. 6: 5–27.Google Scholar
  24. Silberschmidt, K. 1941. A transmissão experimental da mancha anular do cafeeiro. O Biológico 7: 93–99.Google Scholar
  25. Valdez, R.B. 1966. The current status of the ring spot disease of coffee in the Philippines. Philippine Agric. Vol. L: 267–275.Google Scholar
  26. Vega, J. and Costa, A.S. 1987. Alterações intracelulares induzidas pelo vírus da mancha anular do cafeeiro em lesões locais de Chenopodium. Summa Phytopathol. 13: 28 (abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto BiológicoSão Paulo, SPBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Entomologia, Fitopatologia e Zoologia Agrícola, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”Universidade de São PauloPiracicaba, SPBrazil
  3. 3.Entomology and Nematology DepartmentUniversity of Florida, IFAS, Citrus Research and Education CenterLake AlfredUSA

Personalised recommendations