Advertisement

Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 30, Issue 1–3, pp 107–133 | Cite as

Morphological Observations on Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) Including Comparisons with B. californicus and B. obovatus

  • W. Calvin Welbourn
  • Ronald Ochoa
  • Ethan C. Kane
  • Eric F. Erbe
Article

Abstract

The genus Brevipalpus has over 300 species worldwide. The three most important agricultural pest species in the genus, Brevipalpus californicus (Banks), B. obovatus Donnadieu, and B. phoenicis (Geijskes), have been consistently confused and misidentified for more than 50 years. The present study provides a discussion of the characters and character states used to separate these mites. Low-temperature scanning electron microscopy and traditional light microscopy techniques were used to illustrate the subtle morphological differences between these three species. Morphology of the dorsal propodosoma, opisthosoma, and leg chaetotaxy of all three species was examined and compared. The number of dorsal setae, the number of solenidia (omega) on tarsus II, and dorsal cuticular patterns were the most important characters in the identification of Brevipalpus species. B. phoenicis is similar to B. californicus in having two omega on tarsus leg II and different from B. obovatus which has only one omega on tarsus leg II and similar to B. obovatus in having only one pair of F setae (f 3), but differing from B. californicus which has two pairs of F setae (f 2–3). The dorsal opisthosomal and propodisomal cuticular patterns frequently used to distinguish between these three species are useful but one must be aware that age, feeding, and mounting techniques can affect the appearance of these characters.

false spider mites flat mites morphology low-temperature scanning electron microscopy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achor, D.S., Ochoa, R., Erbe, E.F., Aguilar, H., Wergin, W.P. and Childers, C.C. 2001. Relative advantages of low temperature versus ambient temperature scanning electron microscopy in the study of mite morphology. Int. J. Acarol. 27(1): 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. Akbar, S. and Khalid, S. 1999. New species of the genus Brevipalpus (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae) from Pakistan. Acarologia 40(2): 155–163.Google Scholar
  3. Alberti, G. and Coons, L.B. 1999. Chapter 6 Acari: Mites. In: Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates Chelicerate Arthropoda. F.W. Harrison and R.F. Foelix (eds), Vol. 8C, 700 pp. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Attiah, H.H. 1956. The genus Brevipalpus in Egypt. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypt. 40: 433–448.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, E.W. 1949. The genus Brevipalpus (Acarina: Pseudoleptidae). Am. Midland Nat. 2: 350–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, E.W. and Tuttle, D.M. 1987. The false spider mites of Mexico (Tenuipalpidae: Acari). USDA Agric. Res. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1706, 237 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, E.W., Tuttle, D.M. and Abbatiello, M.J. 1975. The false spider mites of Northwestern and Northcentral Mexico (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Smithsn. Contrib. Zool. 194: 23.Google Scholar
  8. Banks, N. 1904. Four new species of injurious mites. J. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 12: 53–56.Google Scholar
  9. Banks, N. 1912. New American mites. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 14: 96–98.Google Scholar
  10. Blanchard, E. 1940. Tres ácaros daninos para los cultivos Argentinos. Rev. fac. Agron. La Plata (tercera época) 24: 11–18.Google Scholar
  11. Chagas, C.M., Rossetti, V., Colariccio, A., Lovisolo, O., Kitajima, E.W. and Childers, C.C. 2001. Brevipalpus mites (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) as vectors of plant viruses. In: Proc. Acarol. Cong. R.B. Halliday, D.E. Walter, H.C. Proctor, R.A. Norton and M.J. Colloff (eds), pp. 369–375. CSIRO Publishing, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Childers, C.C., Kitajima, E.W., Welbourn, W.C., Rivera, C. and Ochoa, R. 2001. Brevipalpus mites on citrus and their status as vectors of citrus leprosis. Manejo Integrado de Plagas (Costa Rica). 60: 66–70.Google Scholar
  13. Childers, C.C., Rodrigues, J.C.V. and Welbourn, W.C. 2003. Host plants of Brevipalpus californicus, B. obovatus, and B. phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 30: 29–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Leon, D. 1961a. The genus Brevipalpus in Mexico, part II (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Fla. Entomol. 44(1): 41–52.Google Scholar
  15. De Leon, D. 1961b. New false spider mites with notes on some previously described species (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Fla. Entomol. 44(4): 167–179.Google Scholar
  16. De Leon, D. 1965. New Tenuipalpidae (false spider mites) from British Guiana with notes on four described species. Fla. Entomol. 48(1): 65–75.Google Scholar
  17. De Leon, D. 1967. Some Mites of the Caribbean area. Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence, KS, 66 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Donnadieu, A.L. 1875. Recherches pour servir á l'histoire des Tetranyques. Ann. Soc. Linn., Lyon 22: 29–136.Google Scholar
  19. Erbe, E.F., Wergin, W.P., Ochoa, R., Dickens, J.C. and Moser, W. 2001. Low temperature scanning electron microscopy of soft bodied organisms. Microsci. Microanal. 7(2): 1204–1205.Google Scholar
  20. Evans, G.A., Cromroy, H.L. and Ochoa, R. 1993. The Tenuipalpidae of Honduras (Tenuipalpidae: Acari). Fla. Entomol. 76(1): 126–155.Google Scholar
  21. Flechtmann, C.H.W., Oliveira, C.A.L. and Santos, J.M. 1995. Aspectos taxonômicos do ácaro de leprose Brevipalpus phoenicis. In: Leprose dos Citros. C.A.L. Oliveira and L.C. Donadio (eds), pp. 31–36. FUNEP, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
  22. Geijskes, D.C. 1939. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der europäischen Spinnmilben (Acari: Tetranychidae), mit besonder Berücksichtigung der niederländischen Arten. Med. Van de Land. 42: 4–46.Google Scholar
  23. Ghai, S. and Shenhmar, M. 1984. A review of the world fauna of Tenuipalpidae (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Orient. Insects 18: 99–172.Google Scholar
  24. Gonzalez, R.H. 1975. Revision of the Brevipalpus phoenicis 'complex' with descriptions of new species from Chile and Thailand (Acarina, Tenuipalpidae). Acarologia 17(1): 81–91.Google Scholar
  25. Grandjean, F. 1939.Les segments post-larvaires de l'hystérosoma chez lef Oribates (Acariens). Bull. Soc. Zool. France 64: 273–284.Google Scholar
  26. Granjean, F. 1958. Sur le comportment et la notation des poils accessories postérieurs aux tarses des Nothroides et d'autres Acariens. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 96: 277–308.Google Scholar
  27. Haramoto, F.H. 1969. Biology and control of Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). Hawaii Agri. Sta. Tech. Bull. 68, 63 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, R.A. 1979. A Glossary of Surface Sculpturing. Occas. Pap. Entomol., Calif. Dept. Food and Agr. 28, 31 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, 614 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Kethely, J.B. 1990. Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida) Chapter 21. In: Soil Biology Guide. D.L. Dindal (ed), pp. 667–756. Wiley, NY.Google Scholar
  31. Kitajima, E.W., Rezende, J.A.M. and Freitas, J.C. 1996. Two types of particles associated with lesions induced by Brevipalpus mites in different plant hosts. VII Encontro Nacional de virologia. S. Lourenco, MG. 275 (abstract).Google Scholar
  32. Knorr, L.C. 1968. Studies on the etiology of leprosis in citrus. In: Proc. 4th Conf. Int. Org. Citrus Virol. J.F.L. Childs (ed), pp. 332–341. Univ. Fla., Gainesville.Google Scholar
  33. Krantz, G.W. 1978. A Manual of Acarology. Oregon State Univ. Book Stores, Inc. Corvallis, 509 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Lindquist, E.E. 1985. Anatomy, phylogeny and systematics. L I. I. External anatomy. In:World Crop Pests, 1A. Spider Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 3–28. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  35. Manson, D.C.M. 1963. Mites of the families Tetranychidae and Tenuipalpidae associated with citrus in Southeast Asia. Acarologia 5(3): 351–364.Google Scholar
  36. Manson, D.C.M. 1967. Mites of the families Tenuipalpidae and Tetranychidae intercepted entering New Zealand from overseas. N. Z. J. Sci. 10(3): 664–674.Google Scholar
  37. McGregor, E.A. 1914. Four new tetranychids. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 7(4): 354–364.Google Scholar
  38. McGregor, E.A. 1949. Nearctic mites of the family Pseudoleptidae. Mem. So. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3(2): 1–45.Google Scholar
  39. Mitrofanov, V.I. 1973. Revision of the subfamily Brevipalpinae (Trombidiformes, Tenuipalpidae). Zool. J. Akad. Nauk. S.S.R. 52: 507–512 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  40. Morishita, F.S. 1954. Biology and control of Brevipalpus inornatus (Banks). J. Econ. Entomol. 47(3): 449–456.Google Scholar
  41. Ochoa, R.C. 1985. Reconocimento preliminary de los ácaros fitoparásitos del género Brevipalpus (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) en Costa Rica. Ing. Agr. Thesis, Facult. De Agronomia, Universidad de Costa Rica, 124 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Ochoa, R.C. and Salas, L.A. 1989. The genus Brevipalpus in Costa Rica (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). Int. J. Acarol. 15(1): 21–30.Google Scholar
  43. Ochoa, R., Aguilar, H. and Vargas, C. 1994. Phytophagous mites of Central America: An illustrated guide. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, 234 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Ochoa, R., Aguilar, H., Evans, G. and Vargas, C. 1996. Knowledge of phytophagous mites (Prostigmata) of Central America. In: Proc. Acarology IX, R. Mitchell, D.J. Horn, G.R. Needham and W.C. Welbourn (eds). Vol. 1, pp. 181–184. Ohio Biol. Surv., Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  45. Prieto Trueba, D. 1984. Morphological changes in the orthogenesis of Brevipalpus phoenicis (Geijskes) (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae)-the pest of citrus trees in Cuba. Vestnik leningr. Gos. Univ. (Biol.) 1984(3): 107–112 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  46. Pritchard, E.A. and Baker, E.W. 1951. The false spider mites of California (Acarina: Phytoptpalpidae). Univ. Calif. Pub. Entomol 9(1): 1–94.Google Scholar
  47. Pritchard, E.A. and Baker, E.W. 1958. The false spider mites. Univ. Calif. Pub. Entomol. 14(3): 175–274.Google Scholar
  48. Quiros-Gonzalez, M.J. 1986. A systematic and phylogenetic analysis of the world genera of Tenuipalpidae Berlese (Acari: Tetranychoidea). PhD. Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, USA, 429 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Quiros-Gonzalez, M.J. and Baker, E.W. 1984. Idiosomal and leg chaetotaxy in the Tuckerellidae Baker & Pritchard: Ontogeny and nomenclature. In: Proc. VI Int. Congr. Acarol., D.A Griffiths and C.E. Bowman (eds), Vol. 1, pp. 166–173. Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1982. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  50. Reck, G.F. 1959. Identification of tetranychid mites. Fauna Tenas-Caucasia-Akad. Nauk Gruzinsk. SSR Tbilisi, 152 pp. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  51. Rodrigues, J.C.V., Machado, M.A., Kitajima, E.W. and Müller, G.W. 2000. Transmission of citrus leprosis virus by Brevipalpus phoenicis (Acari: Tenuipalpidae). In: Proc. 14th Conf. Int. Org. Citrus Virol., J.V. da Garcia, R.F. Lee and R.K. Yokomi (eds), pp. 174–178.Google Scholar
  52. Sadana, G.L. 1997. False Spider Mites Infesting Crops in India, 201 pp. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India.Google Scholar
  53. Sayed, M.T. 1946. Description of Tenuipalpus granti nov. spec. and Brevipalpus pyri Nov. Spec. Bull. Soc. Fouad 1er Entomol. 30: 99–104.Google Scholar
  54. Smiley, R.L. and Gerson, U. 1995. A review of the Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Prostigmata) of Australia with descriptions of two new genera and four new species. Int. J. Acarol. 21(1): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smiley, R.L. and Gerson, U. 1996. Observations on the Tenuipalpidae (Prostigmata) and a new subfamily classification. In: Acarology IX Proc. R. Mitchell, D.J. Horn, G.R. Needham and W.C. Welbourn (eds). Vol. 1, pp. 367–371. Ohio Biol. Surv., Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  56. Smiley, R.L., Frost, W.E. and Gerson, U. 1996. A review of the Tenuipalpidae (Acari: Prostigmata) of Australia with descriptions of two new genera and four new species. Int. J. Acarol. 21(1): 33–45.Google Scholar
  57. Smith Meyer, M.K.P. 1979. The Tenuipalpidae (Acari) of Africa with key to the world fauna. Entomol. Memoir No. 50., Dept. Agric. Tech. Serv. Plant Prot. Res. Inst., South Africa, 135 pp.Google Scholar
  58. Smith Meyer, M.K.P. and Ueckermann, E.A. 1997. A review of some species of the families Allochaetophoridae, Linotetranyidae, and Tuckerellidae (Acari: Tetranychoidea). Int. J. Acarol. 23(2): 67–92.Google Scholar
  59. Wergin, W.P., Ochoa, R., Erbe, E.F., Craemer, C. and Raina, A.K. 2000. Use of lowtemperature field emission scanning electron microscopy to examine mites. Scanning 22(3): 145–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Womersley, H. 1940. Studies in Australian Acarina Tetranychidae and Trichadenidae. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 64(2): 233–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Calvin Welbourn
    • 1
  • Ronald Ochoa
    • 2
  • Ethan C. Kane
    • 2
  • Eric F. Erbe
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Plant IndustryFlorida Department of Agriculture and Consumer ServicesGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS-PSIBeltsvilleUSA
  3. 3.Electron Microscopy UnitSoybean Genomics & Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS-PSIBeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations