Advertisement

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

, Volume 21, Issue 1–2, pp 75–101 | Cite as

Turning Around a State Owned Enterprise: The Case of Scooters India Limited

  • Sunil Kumar Maheshwari
  • David Ahlstrom
Article

Abstract

Past research on firm turnaround shows that the propensity of an organization to undertake a successful turnaround depends on a complex interaction between action choices in the organization and constraints in the business environment. This article extends this line of research by examining corporate decline and turnaround in an environment with numerous challenging environmental constraints: the state-owned sector in India. Using an in-depth case study of a state-owned enterprise in India, this research found that the business environment, the firm's decision-making process, its leadership characteristics, and the stakeholders' responses were are all found to influence the firm's action choices and turnaround process. This study also shows that in addition to the strategic and operational changes so commonly associated with firm turnaround, the importance of leadership and the basic credibility of the firm's top management with major stakeholders and government officials also play key roles in the turnaround.

action choice decision-making leadership turnaround 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Ahlstrom and G.D. Bruton, “Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy,” Academy of Management Executive, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 72-83, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. D. Ahlstrom, G.D. Bruton, and S. Lui, “Navigating China's changing economy: Strategies for private firms,” Business Horizons, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 5-15, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. H.E. Aldrich, and J. Pfeffer, “Environments of organizations,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 2, pp. 79-105, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. G.T. Allison, Essence of Decision; Explaining the Cuban Missile Crises, Litle, Brown: Boston, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. J. Argenti, Corporate Collapse: The Causes and Symptoms, McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead, UK, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. C. Argyris, “Personality and organization theory revisited,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 141-167, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. K. Arogyaswamy, V.L. Barker III, and M. Yasar-Ardekani, “Firm turnarounds: An integrative two-stage model,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 493-525, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. V.L. Barker III and I.M. Duhaime, “Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, pp. 13-38, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. B. Bozeman and E.A. Slusher, “Scarcity and environmental stress in public organizations: A conjectural essay,” Administration and Society, vol. 11, pp. 335-356, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. L.D. Brown, “Effective change strategies for public enterprises: Lessons from turnaround cases,” Vikalpa, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 97-112, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. G.D. Bruton, D. Ahlstrom, and J.C.C. Wan, “Turnaround success of large and midsize Chinese owned firms: Evidence from Hong Kong and Thialand,” Journal of World Business, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 146-165, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. G.D. Bruton, D. Ahlstrom, and J.C.C. Wan, “Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, pp. 519-540, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. G.R. Carrol, “Organizational ecology,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 10, pp. 71-93, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. K.S. Cameron, R.I. Sutton, and D.A. Whetten, “Issues in organizational decline,” in Cameron et al. (eds.), Readings in Organizational Decline, pp. 3-20, 1988.Google Scholar
  15. P. Chanda, Corporate Turnaround: Strategies for Renewal, McGraw-Hill Education: Singapore: (Asia), 2002.Google Scholar
  16. C. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. M. Clifford, Meltdown: Asia's Boom, Bust, and Beyond, Prentice Hall: Paramus, NJ, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. J. Collins, Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap - And Others Don't, HarperBusiness: New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. R.A. D'Aveni, “The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study of strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 577-605, 1989.Google Scholar
  20. R.S. Dooley and G.E. Fryxell, “Ataining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 389-402, 1999.Google Scholar
  21. K.M. Eisenhardt, “Agency theory: An assessment and review,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 57-74, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. E. Fama and M. Jensen, “Agency problems and residual claims,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 26, pp. 301-325, 1983.Google Scholar
  23. J.D. Ford and D.A. Baucus, “Organizational adaptation to performance downturns: An interpretation-based perspective,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 366-380, 1987.Google Scholar
  24. P. Ghemawat, Commitment: The Dynamics of Strategy, Free Press: New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  25. P. Goodwin and G. Wright, Decision Analysis for Management Judgement, John Wiley: West Sussex, 1998.Google Scholar
  26. G.E. Greenley and M. Oktembil, “A comparison of slack resources in high and low performing British companies,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 377-398, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. D.C. Hambrick and R.A. D'Aveni, “Large corporate failures as downward spirals,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 33, pp. 1-23, 1988.Google Scholar
  28. D.C. Hambrick, M.A. Geletkanycz, and J.W. Fredrickson, “Top executive commitment to status quo: Some tests of its determinants,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 401-418, 1993.Google Scholar
  29. J.S. Hammond, R.L. Keeney, and H. Raiffa, “The hidden traps in decision making,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 76, pp. 47-58, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. M.T. Hannan and J.H. Freeman, “The population ecology of organizations,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, pp. 929-964, 1977.Google Scholar
  31. S.G. Harris and R.I. Sutton, “Functions of parting ceremonies in dying organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5-30, 1986.Google Scholar
  32. D. Kahneman, “The thought leader,” Strategy + Business, 2003.Google Scholar
  33. D. Kahneman and D. Lovallo, “Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking,” Management Science vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 17-31, 1993.Google Scholar
  34. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica, vol. 47, pp. 263-290, 1979.Google Scholar
  35. R.M. Kanter, “Leadership and the psychology of turnarounds,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 3-11, June, 2003.Google Scholar
  36. D. Kelly and T.L. Amburgey, “Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 591-612, 1991.Google Scholar
  37. P.N. Khandwalla, Effective Turnaround of Sick Enterprises (Indian Experience): Text and Cases, Commonwealth Secretariat: London, 1989.Google Scholar
  38. P.N. Khandwalla, “Humane turnarounds,” Vikalpa, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 3-16, 1991.Google Scholar
  39. P.N. Khandwalla, Innovative Corporate Turnaround, Sage Publications: New Delhi, 1992.Google Scholar
  40. P.N. Khandwalla, Turnaround Excellence, Sage Publications: New Delhi, 2001.Google Scholar
  41. T.W. Lee, Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Sage Publications: London, 1999.Google Scholar
  42. D.J. Levinson, et al. The Seasons of a Man's Life, Alfred A Knopf: New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  43. G. McNamara and P. Bromiley, “Decision making in an organizational setting: Cognitive and organizational influences on risk assessment in commercial lending,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1063-1088, 1997.Google Scholar
  44. M.W. Meyer and L.G. Zucker, Permanently Failing Organizations, Sage: Newbury Park, 1989.Google Scholar
  45. J. Mezias and W. Starbuck, “What do managers know, anyway?” Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 16-18, 2003.Google Scholar
  46. M.A. Mone, W. Mckinley, and V.L. Barker III, “Organizational decline and innovation:Acontingency framework,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 115-132, 1998.Google Scholar
  47. M.W. Peng, Global Strategy, Prentice Hall: New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  48. A. Pettigrew, The Politics of Organizational Decision Making, Tavistock: London, 1973.Google Scholar
  49. J. Pfeffer and G.R. Salancik, “Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of a university budget,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 19, pp. 135-151, 1974.Google Scholar
  50. J. Pfeffer and G.R. Salancik, “The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective,” Harper and Row: New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  51. B.B. Rao, “Avoid time and cost over-runs to check sickness,” in Y.S. Mahajan and M.R. Virmani (eds.), Sickness in Industries: Causes and Cures, Center for Public Sector Studies, New Delhi, 1987, pp. 19-32.Google Scholar
  52. D.K. Robbins and J.A. Pearce, “Turnaround: Retrenchment and recovery,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, pp. 287-309, 1992.Google Scholar
  53. J. Ruiz-Navarro, “Turnaround and renewal in a Spanish shipyard,” Long Range Planning, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 51-59, 1998.Google Scholar
  54. D. Schendel, G.R. Patton, and J. Riggs, “Corporate turnaround strategies: A case of profit decline and recovery,” Journal of General Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 3-12, 1976.Google Scholar
  55. J.V. Singh, “Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making,” Academy of management Journal, vol. 29, pp. 562-585, 1986.Google Scholar
  56. B.M. Staw, “Counterforces to change,” in Change in Organizations: New Perspectives on Theory, Research and Practice, Paul S. Goodman and Associates, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco: 1982.Google Scholar
  57. A.L. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  58. R.I. Sutton and A.L. Callahan, “The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 405-436, 1987.Google Scholar
  59. H.L. Tosi, J.P. Katz, and L.R. Gomez-Mejia, “Disaggregating the agency contract: The effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 584-602, 1997.Google Scholar
  60. W. Weitzel and E. Jonsson, “Decline in organizations: A literature integration and extension,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 34, pp. 91-109, 1989.Google Scholar
  61. O.E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Free Press: New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  62. A.V. Wittelsoostuijn, “Bridging behavioral and economic theories of decline: Organizational inertia, strategic competition, and chronic failure,” Management Science, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 501-519, 1998.Google Scholar
  63. R.F. Zammuto and K.S. Cameron, “Environmental decline and organizational response,” in B.M Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour, vol. 7, pp. 223-262, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of ManagementGujaratIndia
  2. 2.Department of ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations