Advertisement

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 86, Issue 1, pp 65–76 | Cite as

Factors influencing the replication of somatic coliphages in the water environment

  • Maite Muniesa
  • Juan Jofre
Article

Abstract

The potential replication of somatic coliphages in the environment has been considered a drawback for their use as viral indicators, although the extent to which this affects their numbers in environmental samples has not been assessed. In this study, the replication of somatic coliphages in various conditions was assayed using suspensions containing naturally occurring somatic coliphages and Escherichia coli WG5, which is a host strain recommended for detecting somatic coliphages. The effects on phage replication of exposing strain WG5 and phages to a range of physiological conditions and the effects of the presence of suspended particles or other bacteria were also assayed. Phage replication was further tested using a strain of Klebsiella terrigena and naturally occurring E. coli cells as hosts. Our results indicate that threshold densities of both host bacterium and phages should occur simultaneously to ensure appreciable phage replication. Host cells originating from a culture in the exponential growth phase and incubation at 37 °C were the best conditions for phage replication in E. coli WG5. In these conditions the threshold densities required to ensure phage replication were about 104 host cells/ml and 103 phages/ml, or 103 host cells/ml and 104 phages/ml, or intermediate values of both. The threshold densities needed for phage replication were higher when the cells proceeded from a culture in the stationary growth phase or when suspended particles or other bacteria were present. Furthermore E. coli WG5 was more efficient in supporting phage replication than either K. terrigenae or E. coli cells naturally occurring in sewage. Our results indicate that the phage and bacterium densities and the bacterial physiological conditions needed for phage replication are rarely expected to be found in the natural water environments.

Coliphages Environment Replication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman H.W. and Nguyen T.M. 1983. Sewage coliphages studied by electron microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45: 1049-1059.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida M.A., Cunha M.A. and Alcántara F. 2001. Loss of estuarine bacteria by viral infection and predation in microcosm conditions. Microb. Ecol. 42: 562-571.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson E.S. 1957. The relations of bacteriophages to bacterial ecology. In: Williams R.E.O. and Spicer C.C. (eds), Microbial Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 189-217.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th. ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous 2000a. EPA method 1602. Male-specific (F+) and somatic coliphage in water by single agar layer (SAL) procedure, 821-R-00-010. EPA, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous 2000b. ISO 10705-2: Water quality. Detection and enumeration of bacteriophages —part 2: Enumeration of somatic coliphages. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switserland.Google Scholar
  7. Araujo R., Muniesa M., Méndez X., Puig A., Queralt N., Lucena F. and Jofre J. 2001. Optimisation and Standardisation of a Method for Detecting and Enumerating Bacteriophages Infecting Bacteroides fragilis. J. Virol. Meth. 93: 127-136.Google Scholar
  8. Armon R. 1993. Bacteriophage monitoring in drinking water: do they fulfil the index or indicator function?. Wat Sci Technol. 27: 463-470.Google Scholar
  9. Bagley S.T. 1985. Habitat association of Klebsiella species. Infect. Control 6: 52-58.Google Scholar
  10. Byappanahalli M.N. and Fujioka R.S. 1998. Evidence that tropical soil environments can support the growth of Escherichia coli. Wat. Sci. Technol. 38: 171-174.Google Scholar
  11. Camper A.K., Mc Feters W., Characklis G. and Jones W.L. 1991. Growth kinetics of coliform bacteria under conditions relevant to drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 2223-2239.Google Scholar
  12. Carrillo M., Estrada E. and Hazen T. 1985. Survival and enumeration of the fecal indicators Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Escherichia coli in a tropical rain forest watershed. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50: 468-476.Google Scholar
  13. Chung H., Jaykus L.A., Lovelance G. and Sobsey M. 1998. Bacteriophages and bacteria as indicators of enteric viruses in oysters and their harvest waters. Wat. Sci. Technol. 38: 37-44.Google Scholar
  14. Contreras-Coll N., Lucena F., Mooijman K., Pierzo V., Boque M., Gawler A., Höller C., Lambiri M., Mirolo G., Moreno B., Niemi M., Sommer R., Valentin B., Wiedenmann A., Young V. and Jofre J. 2002. Occurrence and levels of indicator bacteriophages in bathing waters through Europe. Wat. Res. 36: 4963-4974.Google Scholar
  15. Cornax A. 1991. PhD Thesis. Distribución y dinámica de bacterió-fagos entéricos en heces humanas, agua residual y aguas natu-rales contaminadas: su validez como indicadores de la polución fecal. Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.Google Scholar
  16. Fujioka R.S., Tenno K. and Kansako S. 1988. Naturally-occurring fecal coliforms and fecal coliforms in Hawaii's freshwater streams. Toxicol. Assess. 3: 613-630.Google Scholar
  17. Gauthier F. and Archibald F. 2001. The ecology of “fecal indicator” bacteria commonly found in pulp and paper mill water systems. Wat. Res. 35: 2207-2218.Google Scholar
  18. Grabow W.O.K., Holtzhausen C.S. and de Villiers J.C. 1993. Research on bacteriophages as indicators of water quality. Project report n° 321. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
  19. Havelaar A.H., Hogeboom W.M. and Pot R. 1984. F specific RNA bacteriophages in sewage: methodology and occurrence. Wat. Sci. Technol. 17: 645-655.Google Scholar
  20. Hill V.R. and Sobsey M.D. 1998. Microbial indicator reductions in alternative treatment systems for swine wastewater. Wat. Sci. Tech. 38: 119-122.Google Scholar
  21. IAWPRC Study Group on Health Related Water Microbiology 1991. Bacteriophages as model viruses in water quality control. Wat. Res. 25: 529-545.Google Scholar
  22. Jones K. and Bradshaw S.B. 1996. Biofilm formation by Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison between Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli and a nitrogen fixing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 80: 458-464.Google Scholar
  23. Kokjohn T.A., Sayler G.S. and Miller R.V. 1991. Attachment and replication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophages under conditions simulating aquatic environments. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137: 661-666.Google Scholar
  24. Lucena F., Mendez J., Moron A., Calderon E., Campos C., Guerrero A., Cardenas M., Gantzer C., Schwartzbrood L., Skraber S. and Jofre J. 2003. Occurrence and densities of bacteriophages proposed as indicators in river waters from Europe and South America. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94: 808-815.Google Scholar
  25. Muniesa M., Mocé-Llivina L., Katayama H. and Jofre J. 2002. Hosts that support replication of somatic coliphages detected by E. coli. Antonie van Leewenhoek. 83: 305-315.Google Scholar
  26. Muniesa M., Lucena F. and Jofre J. 1999. Study of the potential relationship between the morphology of infectious somatic coliphages and their persistence in the environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87: 402-409.Google Scholar
  27. Nieuwstad T.J., Mulder E.P., Havelaar A.H. and Van Olphen M. 1988. Elimination of microorganisms from wastewater by tertiary precipitation followed by filtration. Wat. Res. 22: 1389-1397.Google Scholar
  28. Ogunseitan O.A., Sayler G.S. and Miller R. 1990. Dinamic inter-actions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacteriophages in Lake Water. Microb. Ecol. 19: 171-185.Google Scholar
  29. Parry O.T., Whitehead J.A. and Dowling L.T. 1981. Temperature sensitive coliphage in the environment. In: Goddard M. and Butler M. (eds), Viruses and Wastewater Treatment Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp 277-280.Google Scholar
  30. Proctor L.M. and Fuhrman J.A. 1990. Viral mortality of marine bacteria and cyanobacteria. Nature 343: 60-62.Google Scholar
  31. Ripp S. and Miller R.V. 1995. Effects of suspended particulates on the frequency of transduction among Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a freshwater environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 1214-1219.Google Scholar
  32. Rivera S.C., Hazen T.C. and Toranzos G.A. 1988. Isolation of fecal coliforms from pristine sites in a tropical rain forest. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 513-517.Google Scholar
  33. Seeley N.D. and Primrose S.B. 1980. The effect of temperature on the ecology of aquatic bacteriophages. J. Gen. Virol. 46: 87-95.Google Scholar
  34. Solo-Gabriella H.M., Wolfert M.A., Desmarais T.R. and Palmer C.J. 2000. Sources of Esherichia coli in a Coastal subtropical environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 230-237.Google Scholar
  35. Stent G. 1963. Molecular Biology of Bacterial Viruses.. In: Free-man W.H. and co. (eds), San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Vaughn J.M. and Metcalf T.G. 1975. Coliphages as indicators of enteric viruses in shellfish and shellfish raising estuarine waters. Wat. Res. 9: 613-616.Google Scholar
  37. Wiggins B.A. and Alexander M. 1985. Minimum bacterial density for bacteriophage replication: implications for significance of bacteriophages in natural ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49: 19-23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maite Muniesa
    • 1
  • Juan Jofre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations