Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 21, Issue 2–3, pp 191–205 | Cite as

Sub-irrigation in wetland agriculture

  • Phil L. CrossleyEmail author


Much has been written about the chinampas of central Mexico. One of the commonly repeated themes is that these wetland fields were self-irrigated from below in a process known as sub-irrigation. According to this model, water infiltrates the planting platforms from adjacent canals and then rises to the root zone by capillary action. Thus, chinampas are thought to have needed little supplemental irrigation, and produced dependable and high yields. Here I report the results of field and lab studies of soils of 10 chinampas in the region east of Xochimilco, in the Mexican Federal District. These interpretations are combined with discussion of maize rooting tendencies, regional rainfall patterns, and the presence of willow tree roots in chinampa soils. I also consider whether farmers strive to create and maintain optimum field morphologies for subirrigation when faced with both flood and drought risk, and when manual irrigation is aready option. I conclude that while sub-irrigation is possible under certain combinations of field morphology, crop type, and soil properties, it was a relatively minor factor in the overall decision-making process of past chinampa farmers, and should not be a major determinant of future planning for chinampa preservation or reconstruction. Furthermore, sub-irrigation must be modeled carefully in relation to soil properties, croptypes, and seasonality if it is to beconsidered a significant function of wetland fields in any context.

Chinampas Mexico Sub-irrigation Wetland agriculture Xochimilco 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alzate y R. and J. Antonio (1993). “Memoria sobre agricultura (1791).” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), La agricultura chinampera: Compilación histórica (pp. 14–29). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Reprint of extract published in L. C. Orozco (ed.), (1954), “Alzate y la agronomía de la Nueva España.” Mexico, D.F.: Banco Nacional de Crédito Agrícola y Ganadero, S.A., Tomo III.Google Scholar
  2. Armillas, P. (1971). “Gardens on swamps.” Science 174: 653–661.Google Scholar
  3. Avila López, R. (1992). “Arqueología de chinampas en Iztapalapa.” In C. J. González (ed.), Chinampas Prehispanicas (pp. 81–154). México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH), Serie Arqueología.Google Scholar
  4. Barbour, M. G., J. H. Burk, and W. D. Pitts (1987). Terrestrial Plant Ecology, 2nd ed. Menlo Park, CA: The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Bengtson, R. L. (1993). “A fluctuating watertable model for the management of a controlled-drainage/subirrigation system.” Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 36(2): 437–443.Google Scholar
  6. Bojórquez Castro, L. (1995). “El ecosistema lacustre. Xochimilco y el deterioro de las chinampas.” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), Presente, pasado y futuro de las chinampas (pp. 85–137). Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS).Google Scholar
  7. Brady, N. C. (1974). The Nature and Properties of Soils, 8th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Brandyk, T. (1993). “Design and operation of drainage-subirrigation systems in Poland.” Irrigation and Drainage Systems 7(3): 173–187.Google Scholar
  9. Cabello Martínez, S. (1995). “San Luis Tlaxialtemalco.” in T. R. Rabiela (ed.), Presente, pasado y futuro de las chinampas (pp. 155–160). Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
  10. Calnek, E. E. (1972). 'Settlement pattern and chinampa agriculture at Tenochtitlan.” American Antiquity 37(1): 104–114.Google Scholar
  11. Canabal Cristiani, B. (1991). Editor. Rescate de Xochimilco. Mexico City: Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Xochimilco.Google Scholar
  12. Carman, P. C. (1941). “Capillary rise and capillary movement of moisture in fine sands.” Soil Science 52(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Canabal Cristiani, B. (1997). Xochimilco: Una Identidad Recreada. Mexico, D.F.: Universidad Autónoma de México-Xochimilco.Google Scholar
  14. Childs, E. C. (1969). An Introduction to the Physical Basis of Soil Water Phenomena. London: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Ciudad Real, Antonio de (1976). Tratado curioso y docto de las grandezas de la Nueva España. 2 ed, Serie de historiadores y cronistas de Indias, 6. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Originally published 1872, Madrid.Google Scholar
  16. Coe, M. (1964). “The chinampas of Mexico.” Scientific American 211(1): 90–98.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, R. L., N. R. Fausey, and J. G. Streeter (1991). “Yield potential of soybean growth under a subirrigation/drainage water management system.” Agronomy Journal 83(5) (Sept/Oct): 884–887.Google Scholar
  18. Crossley, P. L. (1999). Sub-irrigation and Temperature Amelioration in Chinampa Agriculture. PhD Dissertation, Geography, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  19. Daubenmire, R. F. (1959). Plants and Environment: A Textbook of Plant Autecology, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Denevan, W. M. (1970). “Aboriginal drained-field cultivation in the Americas.” Science 169: 647–654.Google Scholar
  21. Denevan, W. and B. L. Turner II (1974). “Forms, functions and associations of raised fields in the Old world tropics.” Journal of Tropical Geography 39: 24–33.Google Scholar
  22. Ezcurra, E. (1990). De Las Chinampas a La Megalópolis. México, D.F.: Secretaría de Educación PÚblica, Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  23. Foth, H. D. (1962). “Root and top growth of corn.” Agronomy Journal 54: 49–52.Google Scholar
  24. Frederick, C. D. (1996). Landscape Change and Human Settlement in the Southeastern Basin of Mexico. Draft of Report to Dr. Mary Hodge, University of Houston-Clear Lake, in Fulfillment of Contract Number XXX.Google Scholar
  25. Frederick, C. D. (1999). Chinampa Cultivation in the Basin of Mexico: Observations on the Evolution of Form and Function. Paper presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology. Chicago, March 24-28, 1999.Google Scholar
  26. Green, W. J. and E. C. Green (1895). Sub-irrigation in the Greenhouse. Wooster, Ohio: Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  27. Iwata, S., T. Tabuchi, and B. P. Warkentin (1988). Soil-Water Interactions. Books in Soils and the Environment. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Jury, W. A., W. R. Gardner, and W. H. Gardner (1991). Soil Physics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  29. Mansilla Menéndez, E. (1995). “La relación entre la Ciudad de México y Xochimilco.” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), Presente, pasado y futuro de las chinampas (pp. 201–204). Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
  30. Marroquín y Rivera, M. (1910). Obras de provisión de aguas potables para la Ciudad de México. Mexico City: Juan Aguilar Vera.Google Scholar
  31. Moncada Maya, J. Omar (1982). “Evolución y problemas actuales de la zona de chinampas del Distrito Federal.” Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM 12: 211–225.Google Scholar
  32. Nichols, D. L. and C. D. Frederick (1993). “Irrigation canals and chinampas: recent research in the Northern Basin of Mexico.” In V. L. Scarborough and B. L. Isaac (eds.), Economic Aspects of Water Management in the Prehispanic New World. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 7 (pp. 123–150). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nuttal, Z. (1992). “Los jardínes del antiguo México.” In C. J. González (ed.), Chinampas Prehispanicas (pp. 41–61). México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH), Serie Arqueología.Google Scholar
  34. Outerbridge, T. (1987). “The disappearing chinampas of Xochimilco.” The Ecologist 17(2): 76–83.Google Scholar
  35. Orozco y Berra, M. (1864). Memoria para la carta hidrográfica del Valle de México. Mexico City: A. Boix.Google Scholar
  36. Parsons, J. R. (1976). “Settlement and population history of the basin of Mexico.” In E. R. Wolf (ed.), The Valley of Mexico (pp. 69–100). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  37. Parsons, J. R., E. Brumfiel, M. H. Parsons, and D. J. Wilson (1982). Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the Southern Valley ofMexico. The Chalco-Xochimilco Region. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, No. 14. Ann Arbour: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  38. Patel, R. M. (1999). “Subirrigation with brackish water for vegetable production in arid regions.” Bioresource Technology 70(1): 33–37.Google Scholar
  39. Peña, E. M. (1978). “El trabajo agrícola en un pueblo chinampero: San Luis Tlaxialtemalco.” Tésis de Maestría, Ciencias Antropológicas, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  40. Philip, J. R. (1991). “Effects of root and subirrigation depth on evaporation and percolation losses.” Soil Science Society of America Journal 55(6): 1520–1523.Google Scholar
  41. Rane, F. W. (1896). Surface and Sub-irrigation out of Doors. Durham, NH: New Hampshire College Agricultural Experiment Station, New Hampshire College of Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts.Google Scholar
  42. Reader, R. J., A. Jalili, J. P. Grime, R. E. Spencer, and N. Matthews (1992). “A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil.” Journal of Ecology 81: 543–550.Google Scholar
  43. Rojas Rabiela, T. (1991). “Ecological and agricultural changes in the chinampas of Xochimilco-Chalco.” In H. R. Harvey (ed.), Land and Politics in the Valley of Mexico (pp. 275–293). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rojas Rabiela, T. (1993a). “Evolución histórica del repertorio de plantas cultivadas en las chinampas de la Cuenca del México.” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), La agricultura chinampera: Compilación histórica (pp. 203–281). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.Google Scholar
  45. Rojas Rabiela, T. (1993b). “La tecnología indígena de construcción de chinampas en la Cuenca de México.” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), La agricultura chinampera: Compilación histórica (pp. 301–327). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.Google Scholar
  46. Romero Lankao, P. (1995). Impacto Socioambiental, en Xochimilco y Lerma, De Las Obras de Abastecimiento de La Ciudad de Mexico. México, D.F.: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco.Google Scholar
  47. Ruddle, K. and G. Zhong (1988). Integrated Agricultureaquaculture in South China. The Dike-pond System of the Zhujiang Delta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Salter, J. P. (1966). “The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils: III. Quantitative relationships between particle size, composition, and available-water capacity.” Journal of Soil Science 17: 93–98.Google Scholar
  49. Sanborn, J. W. (1893). Sub-irrigation vs. Surface Irrigation. Google Scholar
  50. Logan: Utah Agricultural College Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  51. Sanders, W. T. (1993). “El lago y el volcán: la chinampa.” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), La agricultura chinampera: compilación histórica (pp. 129–179). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.Google Scholar
  52. Sanders, W. T., J. R. Parsons, and R. S. Santley (1979). The Basin of Mexico: Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Santamaría, M. (1993). “Las Chinampas del Distrito Federal.” In T. R. Rabiela (ed.), La agricultura chinampera: compilación histórica (pp. 43–76). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo.Google Scholar
  54. Schilling, E. (1993). “Los 'jardines flotantes' de Xochimilco. Una selección.” in T. R. Rabiela (ed.), La agricultura chinampera: Compilación histórica (pp. 77–110). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Excerpt from 1938 original, “Die 'Schwimmenden Garten' von Xochimilco.” Schriften des Geographischen Institutes der Universitat Kiel IX(3). Spanish translation by Helga Stein.Google Scholar
  55. Servicio Meteorológico Nacional (SMN) (1952-1988). “Precipitación Mensual, Estación Moyoguarda, Xochimilco.” Mexico City: Servicio Meteorológico Nacional.Google Scholar
  56. Sharp, R. E. and W. J. Davies (1985). “Root growth and water uptake by maize plants in drying soil.” Journal of Experimental Botany 36: 1441–1456.Google Scholar
  57. Siemens, A. H. (1983). “Wetland agriculture in pre-hispanic Mesoamerica.” Geographical Review 73(2): 166–181.Google Scholar
  58. Siemens, A. H. (1998). A Favored Place. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  59. Slatyer, R. O. (1967). Plant-Water Relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sluyter, A. (1994). “Intensive wetland agriculture in Mesoamerica: Space, time, and form.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84(4): 557–584.Google Scholar
  61. Stanley, C. D., and G. A Clark (1995). “Effect of reduced water table and fertilizer levels on subirrigated tomato production.” Applied Engineering in Agriculture 11(3): 385–388.Google Scholar
  62. Stolzy, L. H. (1974). “Soil atmosphere.” In E. W. Carson (ed.), The Plant Root and its Environment (pp. 335–361). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  63. Sykes, D. J. and W. E. Loomis (1967). “Plant and soil factors in permanent wilting percentages and field capacity storage.” Soil Science 104(3): 163–173.Google Scholar
  64. Tabuchi, T. (1966). “Experiment on suction drain from an ideal soil.” Soil Science 102: 329–332.Google Scholar
  65. Torquemada, F. J. de (1975). Monarquia Indiana, 5 ed., Vol. 2. Mexico City: Editorial Porrua, S.A. Originally published 1615, Seville.Google Scholar
  66. von Humboldt, A. (1966). Ensayo político sobre el reino de la Nueva España. Mexico City: Editorial Porrua, S.A. Serie Sepan Cuantos.Google Scholar
  67. West, R. C. (1946-1947). “Photographs of Míxquic, Tláhuac, San Gregorio, and Xochimilco.” In the Robert C. West Photo Archive. Austin: Nettie Lee Benson Latin American Collection, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  68. West, R. C. (1998). “Chinampa agriculture in Mexico.” In R. C. West (ed.), Latin American Geography, Historical-Geographical Essays, 1941-1998 (pp. 39–57). Geoscience and Man, vol. 35. Baton Rouge: Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
  69. West, R. C. and P. Armillas (1950). “Las chinampas de México. Poesía y realidad.” Cuadernos Americanos 50(2): 165–182.Google Scholar
  70. Whiteside, E. P., K. W. Flach, V. C. Jamison, W. D. Kemper, E. G. Knox, and A. C. Orvedal (1967). “Considerations relative to a common particle size scale of earthy materials.” Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 31: 579–584.Google Scholar
  71. Wilken, G. C. (1985). “A note on buoyancy and other dubious characteristics of the 'floating' chinampas of Mexico.” In I. S. Farrington (ed.), Prehistoric Intensive Agriculture in the Tropics (pp. 31-48). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports International Series Vol. 232 (i).Google Scholar
  72. Wilken, G. C. (1987). Good Farmers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  73. Willey, N. L. and C. G. Prada (1939). “El embrujo de las chinampas.” Hispanic American Historical Review 19: 83–96.Google Scholar
  74. Wright, F. S. and F. J. Adamsen (1993). “Peanut and corn yield response to subirrigation through an existing drainage system.” Applied Engineering in Agriculture 9(1): 55–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, KEL 208Western State College of ColoradoGunnisonUSA

Personalised recommendations