Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 61, Issue 1–3, pp 35–50 | Cite as

Riparian forest buffers in agroecosystems – lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa, USA

  • R.C. Schultz
  • T.M. Isenhart
  • W.W. Simpkins
  • J.P. Colletti


Intensive agriculture can result in increased runoff of sediment and agricultural chemicals that pollute streams. Consensus is emerging that, despite our best efforts, it is unlikely that significant reductions in nutrient loading to surface waters will be achieved through traditional, in-field management alone. Riparian forest buffers can play an important role in the movement of water and NPS (non-point source) pollutants to surface water bodies and ground water. Riparian buffers are linear in nature and because of their position in the landscape provide effective connections between the upland and aquatic ecosystems. Present designs tend to use one model with a zone of unmanaged trees nearest the stream followed by a zone of managed trees with a zone of grasses adjacent to the crop field. Numerous variations of that design using trees, shrubs, native grasses and forbs or nonnative cool-season grasses may provide better function for riparian forest buffers in specific settings. Properly designed riparian buffers have been shown to effectively reduce surface NPS pollutant movement to streams and under the right geological riparian setting can also remove them from the groundwater. Flexibility in design can also be used to produce various market and nonmarket goods. Design flexibility should become more widely practiced in the application of this agroforestry practice.

Buffer design Buffer maintenance Filter strips Surface runoff Water quality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bharati L., Lee K-H., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. 2002. Riparian zone soil-water infiltration under crops, pasture and established buffers. Agroforest Syst 56: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer M.T. 2002. Financial agents, water quality and riparian forest buffers. M.S. Thesis. Iowa State University, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Burkhart M.R., Oberle S.L., Hewitt M.J. and Picklus J. 1994. A framework for regional agroecosystems characterization using the national resources inventory. J Environ Quality 23: 866–874.Google Scholar
  4. Colletti J., Ball C., Premachandra W., Mize C., Schultz R., Rule L. and Gan J. 1993. A socio-economic assessment of the Bear Creek Watershed. pp. 295–302. In: Schultz R.C. and Colletti J.P. (eds), Opportunities for Agroforestry in the Temperate Zone Worldwide: Proceedings of the Third North American Agroforestry Conference. Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Crumpton W.G. 2001. Using wetlands for water quality improvement in agricultural watersheds: The importance of a watershed scale approach. Water Sci Technol 44: 559–564.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dabney S.M., McGregor K.C., Meyer L.D., Grissinger E.H. and Foster G.R. 1994. Vegetative barriers for runoff and sediment control. pp. 60–70. In: Mitchell J.K. (ed.), Integrated Resource Management and Landscape Modifications for Environmental Protection. American Society Agricultural Engineering, St. Joseph, MI. USA.Google Scholar
  7. Dillaha T.A., Reneau R.B., Mostaghimi S. and Lee D. 1989. Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control. Transactions American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32: 513–519.Google Scholar
  8. Dinnes D.L., Karlen D.L., Jaynes D.B., Kaspar T.C., Hatfield J.L., Colvin T.S. and Cambardella C.A. 2002. Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained Midwestern soils. Agron J 94: 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmore W. 1992. Riparian responses to grazing practices. pp. 442–457. In: Naiman R.J. (ed.), Watershed Management. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Hameed S. 1999. Spatio-temporal Modeling in an Agricultural Watershed. Ph.D. Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 237 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Isenhart T.M., Schultz R.C. and Colletti J.P. 1997. Watershed restoration and agricultural practices in the midwest: Bear Creek in Iowa. Chapter 15. In: Williams J.E., Dombeck M.P. and Woods C.A. (eds), Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices. American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
  12. Lee K-H., Isenhart, T.M., Schultz R.C. and Mickelson S.K. 1999. Sediment and nutrient trapping abilities of switchgrass and bromegrass buffer strips. Agroforest Syst 44: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee K-H., Isenhart, T.M., Schultz R.C. and Mickelson S.K. 2000. Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. J Environ Quality 29: 1200–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee K-H., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. 2003. Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J Soil Water Conserv 58: 1–8.Google Scholar
  15. Lowrance R., Dabney S. and Schultz R. 2002. Improving water and soil quality with conservation buffers. J Soil Water Conserv 57: 36A–43A.Google Scholar
  16. Marquez C.O., Cambardella C.A., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. 1999. Assessing soil quality in a riparian buffer strip system by testing organic matter fractions. Agroforest Syst 44: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marquez C.O. 2000. Soil Aggregate Dynamics and Aggregate-associated Carbon under Different Vegetation Types in Riparian Soils. Ph.D. Dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 214 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Menzel B.W. 1983. Agricultural management practices and the integrity of instream biological habitat. pp. 305–329. In: Schaller F.W. and Bailey G.W. (eds), Agricultural Management and Water Quality. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  19. Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force. 2001. Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico.Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Mitsch W.J., Day J.W., Gilliam J.W., Groffman P.M., Hey D.L., Randall G.L. and Wang N. 2001. Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. BioScience 51: 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearcy R.W. and Ehleringer J. 1984. Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 7: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Palone R.S. and Todd A.H. (eds) 1997. Chesapeake Bay riparian handbook: A Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Riparian Forest Buffers. USDA For. Serv. NA-TP-02–97. USDA-FS, Radnor, PA.Google Scholar
  23. Schultz R.C., Colletti J.P., Isenhart T.M., Simpkins W.W., Mize C.W. and Thompson M.L. 1995. Design and placement of a multi-species riparian buffer strip system. Agroforest Syst 31: 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schumm S.A., Harvey M.D. and Watson C.C. 1984. Incised channel morphology, dynamics and control. Water Resour. Publ., Littleton, CO.Google Scholar
  25. SimpkinsW.W., Wineland T.R., Andress R.J., Johnston D.A., Caron G.C., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. 2002. Hydrogeological constraints on riparian buffers for reduction of diffuse pollution: examples from the Bear Creek Watershed in Iowa, USA. Water Sci Technol 45: 61–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tufekcioglu A., Raich J.W., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. 1999. Root biomass, soil respiration, and root distribution in crop fields and riparian buffer zones. Agroforest Syst 44: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tufekcioglu A., Raich J.W., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. 2000. Soil respiration in riparian buffers and adjacent croplands. Plant Soil. 229: 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tufekcioglu A., Raich J.W., Isenhart T.M. and Schultz R.C. In press. Biomass, carbon and nitrogen dynamics of multi-species riparian buffer zones within an agricultural watershed in Iowa, USA. Agroforest Syst.Google Scholar
  29. USDA-NRCS. 2003. National Handbook of Conservation Practices. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Welsch D.J. 1991. Riparian Forest Buffers: Function and Design for Protection and Enhancement of Water Resources. NA-PR-07–91. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  31. Wesche T.A., Goertler C.M. and Frye C.B. 1987. Contribution of riparian vegetation to trout cover in small streams. North Am J Fish Manage 7: 151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zaimes G.N., Schultz R.C. and Isenhart T.M. 2004. Stream bank erosion adjacent to riparian forest buffers, row-cropped fields and continuously-grazed pastures along Bear Creek in Central Iowa. J Soil Water Conserv 59: 19–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.C. Schultz
    • 1
  • T.M. Isenhart
    • 1
  • W.W. Simpkins
    • 2
  • J.P. Colletti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Ecology and ManagementIowa State UniversityAmes
  2. 2.Department of Geologic and Atmospheric SciencesIowa State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations