Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 173–186 | Cite as

Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: Review and challenges ahead

  • F. Kwesiga
  • F.K. Akinnifesi
  • P.L. Mafongoya
  • M.H. McDermott
  • A. Agumya


The International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) initiated in 1987 the Southern Africa Regional Agroforestry Programme in partnership with the national research systems in Malawi, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Tanzania to address the problems of low soil fertility and consequent low crop and livestock production, low cash income, and shortages of fuelwood and timber that are common to most rural households in the region. This paper synthesizes agroforestry research and development during the 1990s from a regional perspective and emphasizes scaling-up of promising technologies. The problem of nutrient-depletion can be overcome using nitrogen-fixing and fast growing tree/shrub species, such as Sesbania sesban, Tephrosia vogelii and Gliricidia sepium, as short-duration planted fallows in rotation with crops. Intercropping of food crops with coppicing trees, annual relay intercropping and biomass transfer technologies were found to be appropriate for soil fertility improvement under specific conditions. Tree fodder banks greatly increase fodder production and enrich livestock diets with protein supplements. Rotational woodlots were developed to meet fuelwood and timber demand and reduce pressure on natural woodlands. Research has identified the potential for a number of indigenous fruits in the region to supplement the food needs of rural families, improve their nutritional status and generate cash income. Achieving the ultimate goals of ensuring food security, alleviating poverty and sustaining the environment will require a massive scaling up of adoption of these agroforestry technologies. Key strategies to accomplish this include: increasing the benefits and targeting of agroforestry technologies (for example, through providing substitutes for costly inputs, improving diversification, marketing and processing of agroforestry products, and employing GIS-based targeting techniques) and information-sharing, training and collaborative partnerships in implementation and dissemination of agroforestry options with all major stakeholders (farmers, non-government organizations, extension services, educational institutions, and policy-makers).

Biomass transfer Improved fallows Indigenous fruits Rotational woodlots Scaling up Soil fertility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akinnifesi F.K., Kwesiga F.R., Mhango J., Mkonda A., Chilanga T. and Swai R. 2002. Domesticating priority miombo indigenous fruit trees as a promising livelihood option for smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Acta Horticulturae (in press).Google Scholar
  2. Barrios E., Kwesiga F., Buresh R.J. and Sprent J.I. 1996. Nitrogen mineralization in density fractions of soil organic matter from maize and legume cropping systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28: 1459–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boehringer A., Maghembe J. and Phiri R. 1999. Tephrosia vogelii for soil fertility replenishment in maize-based cropping systems of southern Malawi. Forest, Farm and Community Tree Research Reports 4: 117–120.Google Scholar
  4. Boehringer A. 2001. Facilitating the wider use of agroforestry for development in southern Africa. Development in Practice 11: 434–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell B. 1987. The use of wild fruits in Zimbabwe. Economic Botany 41: 375–385.Google Scholar
  6. Chirwa P.W., Black C.R., Ong C.K. and Maghembe J.A. 2003. Tree and crop productivity in gliricidia/maize/pigeonpea crop-ping systems in southern Malawi. Agroforestry Systems (this issue).Google Scholar
  7. Denning G. 2001. Realising the potential of agroforestry: integrating research and development to achieve greater impact. Development in Practice 11: 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dzowela B.H. 1998 Environmental adaptation and performance of various agroforestry tree species in Zimbabwe. Transactions of the Zimbabwe Scientific Association 72: 2–9.Google Scholar
  9. FAO 1994. Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development: New Directions for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome. 64 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Franzel S., Coe R., Cooper P., Place F. and Scherr S. 2001. Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural Systems 69: 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franzel S., Phiri D. and Kwesiga F. 2002. Assessing the adoption potential of improved fallows in eastern Zambia. In: S. Franzel and S.J. Scherr (eds.), Trees on Farms: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Africa, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
  12. ICRAF 1996. Annual report for 1992. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  13. Ikerra S., Maghembe J., Smithson P. and Buresh R. 1999. Soil nitrogen dynamics and relationships with maize yields in Gliricidia-maize intercrop in Malawi. Plant and Soil 211: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IMF 2000. World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund, Washington DC. USA.Google Scholar
  15. Kadzere I., Chilanga T., Ramadhani T., Lungu S., Malembo L., Rukuni D., Simwanza P., Rarieya M. and Maghembe J. 1998. Choice of priority indigenous fruits for domestication in southern Africa: summary of case studies in Malawi, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. In: Maghembe J., Simons A., Kwesiga F. and Rarieya M. (eds), Selecting Indigenous Trees for Domestication in Southern Africa: Priority Setting with Farmers in Malawi, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. ICRAF, Nairobi, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  16. Kuntashula E., Mafongoya P.L., Sileshi G. and Lungu S. 2003. Potential of biomass transfer technologies in sustaining vegetable production in the dambos of eastern Zambia. Experimental Agriculture (in press).Google Scholar
  17. Kwesiga F., Boehringer A. and Denning G. 2000. Scaling-up soil fertility management innovations in southern Africa: The improved fallow case study in eastern Zambia. In: Going to Scale: Can We Bring More Benefits to More People More Quickly? International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR), Y.C. James Yen Centre, Silang, Cavite, Philippines, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
  18. Kwesiga F.1994. Performance of fifteen provenances of Gliricidia sepium in eastern Zambia. Forest Ecology and Management 64: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kwesiga F.R., Franzel S., Place F., Phiri D. and Simwanza C.P. 1999. Sesbania sesban improved fallows in eastern Zambia: their inception, development and farmer enthusiasm. Agroforestry Systems 47: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mafongoya P.L. and Dzowela B.H. 1998. Soil fertility replenishment through agroforestry systems in two contrasting agro-ecological zones of Zimbabwe. Transactions of the Zimbabwe Scientific Association 72: 31–42.Google Scholar
  21. Maghembe J.A., Simons A.J., Kwesiga F. and Rarieya M. (eds) 1998. Selecting indigenous trees for domestication in southern Africa-priority setting with farmers in Malawi, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry. 94 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Mutangadura G., Jackson H. and Mukurazita D. (eds) 1999. AIDS and African Smallholder Agriculture. Southern Africa AIDS Information and Dissemination Centre (SAFAIDS), Harare, Zi-mbabwe, 206 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Nyathi P. and Campbell B. 1993. The acquisition and use of miombo litter by small-scale farmers in Masvingo, Zimbabwe. Agroforestry Systems 25: 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nyadzi G.I., Janssen B.H., Otsyina R.M., Booltink H.W.G., Ong C.K. and Oenema O. 2003. Water and nitrogen dynamics in rotational woodlots of five tree species in western Tanzania. Agroforestry Systems.Google Scholar
  25. Place F., Franzel S., deWolf J., Rommellse R., Kwesiga F., Niang A. and Jama B. 2002. Agroforestry for soil replenishment: evidence on adoption processes in Kenya and Zambia. In: Barrett C.B., Place F. and Aboud A.A. (eds), Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: understanding and improving current practices. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 155–168.Google Scholar
  26. Ramadhani T., Otsyina R. and Franzel S. 2002 Improving household incomes and reducing deforestation using rotational wood-lots in Tabora district, Tanzania. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 89: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rao M.R., Mafongoya P.L., Kwesiga F. and Maghembe J.A. 1999. Nutrient cycling in agroforestry systems of the semi-arid tropics of Africa. Annals of Arid Zone 38: 275–307.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Kwesiga
    • 1
  • F.K. Akinnifesi
    • 2
  • P.L. Mafongoya
    • 3
  • M.H. McDermott
    • 1
  • A. Agumya
    • 1
  1. 1.International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF)Southern Africa Regional Agroforestry ProgrammeMt. Pleasant, HarareZimbabwe
  2. 2.ICRAF Agroforestry ProgrammeZombaMalawi
  3. 3.ICRAF Agroforestry ProgrammeChipataZambia

Personalised recommendations