Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 83–106 | Cite as

Sticks, Stones and Semantics: The Ivory Tower Bully's Vocabulary of Motives

  • E. D. Nelson
  • R. D. Lambert


This ethnography focuses on the techniques of normalization used by university professors who are accused by their colleagues of bullying behavior. We examine how the organizational structure and institutional values of the university provide protective coloration for academic intimidation and discourage both the detection and effective labeling of such behavior. In noting that attempts to label bullying behavior frequently fail because the judgments are seen as mere matters of opinion in an environment whose principal currency of exchange is opinion itself, we modify and extend Sykes and Matza's discussion of neutralization techniques to academic settings. While we cannot speak to the presence or absence of guilt feelings on the part of alleged academic bullies, or to whether neutralization techniques successfully assuage such feelings, we can nevertheless discern the operation of these techniques to resist the imputation of unflattering social identities and/or to lay claim to public identities that are highly esteemed within the academy. Moreover, we identify three additional techniques of normalization that are employed by alleged ivory tower bullies: appropriation and inversion, in which accused bullies claim victim status for themselves; evidentiary solipsism, in which alleged bullies portray themselves as uniquely capable of divining and defining the “true” meaning-structure of events; and emotional obfuscation, which takes the form of employing symbols and imagery that are chosen for their perceived ability to elicit an emotional response on the part of an academic audience.

bullying deviance professors universities neutralization normalization vocabulary of motives accounts 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agnew, Robert. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence. Criminology, 32, 555–579.Google Scholar
  2. Arthurs, H.W. (Chair), Blais, R. A., & Thompson, J. (1994). Integrity in scholarship: A report to Concordia University. Mimeo, April.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality.NewYork: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  5. Biggam, F. H., & Power, K.G. (1999).Acomparison of the problem-solving abilities and psychological distress of suicidal, bullied, and protected prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 196–216.Google Scholar
  6. Cavan, S. (1966). Liquor license. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Cleary, T. (1998). Translator's preface. In Sun Tzu (Thomas Cleary, trans.), The art of war (pp. 7–56). Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  8. Cowan, J. S. (1994). Lessons from the Fabrikant file: A report to the Board of Governors of Concordia University. An independent review of the employment history of Valery Fabrikant at Concordia, with particular emphasis on concrete measures to enhance the future ability of the University to deal with a wide range of issues raised by the case in question. Montreal: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  9. Crick, N. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617.Google Scholar
  10. Crick, N., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). “Superiority” is in the eye of the beholder: A comment on Sutton, Smith and Swettenham. Social Development, 8, 128–131.Google Scholar
  11. Curcione, N. (1997). Suburban snowmen: Facilitating factors in the careers of middle-class coke dealers. Deviant Behavior, 18, 233–253.Google Scholar
  12. deYoung, M. (1992). The indignant page: Techniques of neutralization in the publications of pedophile organizations. Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 583–591.Google Scholar
  13. Dodder, R. A., & Hughes, S. P. (1993). Neutralization and drinking behavior. Deviant Behavior, 14, 65–79.Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, J. D. (1970). Deviance and respectability: The social construction of moral meanings. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Duncan, R. D. (1998). Maltreatment by parents and peers: The relationship between child abuse, bully victimization and psychological distress. Child Maltreatment, 4, 45–55.Google Scholar
  16. Eliason, S. L., & Dodder, R. (1999). Techniques of neutralization used by deer poachers in the western United States. Deviant Behavior, 20, 233–252.Google Scholar
  17. Erikson, K. (1964). Notes on the sociology of deviance. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), The other side (pp. 9–21). New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  18. Fattah, E. (1991). Understanding criminal victimization. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Fish, S. (1994). There's no such thing as free speech. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fogel, S. (1988). The postmodern university: Essays on the deconstruction of the humanities. Toronto: ECW Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gannon, R. (1995). The duty of fair representation: faculty associations have the responsibility to represent and support members involved in disputes. Canadian Association of University Teachers Bulletin, October 4.Google Scholar
  22. Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.Google Scholar
  23. Garrett, T. (1997). Trainer-trainee bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 227–232.Google Scholar
  24. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday-Anchor.Google Scholar
  25. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  26. Goldsmith, A. J. (1991). External review and self-regulation: police accountability and the dialectic of complaints procedures. In A. J. Goldsmith (Ed.), Complaints against the police: The trend to external review (pp. 13–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hamlin, J. E. (1988). The misplaced role of rational choice in neutralization theory. Criminology, 26, 425–438.Google Scholar
  28. Hazani, M. (1991). Aligning vocabulary, symbol banks, and sociocultural structure. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 20, 179–202.Google Scholar
  29. Heubeck, B., & O'Sullivan, C. (1998). An exploration into the nature, frequency and impact of school hassles in the middle school years. Australian Psychologist, 33, 130–137.Google Scholar
  30. Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685.Google Scholar
  31. Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, E. (1962). Good people and dirty work. Social Problems, 10, 3–11.Google Scholar
  33. Johnston, M. (1996). Dealing with bullying. New York: Rosen Publishing Groups Power/Kids Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kitsuse, J. (1962). Societal reaction to deviant behavior: Problems of theory and method. Social Problems, 9, 247–256.Google Scholar
  35. Lajoie, G., McLellan, A., & Lajoie, G. (1997). Taking action against bullying. Coquitlam, BC: Bully B'Ware Productions.Google Scholar
  36. Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184.Google Scholar
  37. Madson, K. C. (1996). Differing perceptions of bullying and their practical implications. Educational and Child Psychology, 13, 14–22.Google Scholar
  38. McCormick, A. E., & Zampa, F. P. (1990). Over-riding accusations: Contexts of corporate responses to stockholder proxy resolutions. Deviant Behavior, 11, 175–193.Google Scholar
  39. McIntyre, S. (1995). Gender bias within the law school: “The memo” and its impact. In The Chilly Collective (Ed.), Breaking anonymity: The chilly climate for women faculty (pp. 211–263). Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (1998). How to silence one's conscience: Cognitive defenses against the feeling of guilt. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28, 287–318.Google Scholar
  42. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Minor, W. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 295–318.Google Scholar
  44. Nader, R., & Shugart, C. (1980). Old solutions for old problems. In L. Nader (Ed.), No access to law: Alternatives to the American judicial system (pp. 3–21). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, E. D. (1994). Sugar daddies and the gentleman's code. Qualitative Sociology, 16, 143–168.Google Scholar
  46. Olweus, D. (1989). The Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Norway: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  47. Olweus, D. (1992). Victimization among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In G.W. Albee, L. A. Bond, & T. C. Monsey (Eds.), Improving children's lives: Global perspectives on prevention (pp. 279–295). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Ortony, A. (1987). Is guilt an emotion? Cognition and Emotion, 1, 283–298.Google Scholar
  50. Pfohl, S. J. (1985). Images of deviance & social control. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  51. Pfuhl, E. H. (1978). The unwed father: A non-deviant rule breaker. The Sociological Quarterly, 19, 113–128.Google Scholar
  52. Pogrebin, M. R., Poole, E. D., & Martinez, A. (1992). Accounts of professional misdeeds: The sexual exploitation of clients by psychotherapists. Deviant Behavior, 13, 229–252.Google Scholar
  53. Randall, P. (1997). Adult bullying: Perpetrators and victims. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Rayner, C., & Hoel, H. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. Journal of Community and Social Psychology, 7, 181–191.Google Scholar
  55. Reiss, A. J. Jr. (1961). The social integration of queers and peers. Social Problems, 9, 102–119.Google Scholar
  56. Roberts, P., & Vickers, L. (1998). Harassment at work as discrimination: The current debate in England and Wales. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 3, 91–114.Google Scholar
  57. Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (1997). In defense of shame: Shame in the context of guilt and embarrassment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 1–15.Google Scholar
  58. Salamon, E. (1984). Kept women: Mistresses in the '80s. London: Orbis.Google Scholar
  59. Schuster, B. (1999). Outsiders at school: The prevalence of bullying and its relation to social status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 175–190.Google Scholar
  60. Scott, R. A. (1972). A proposed framework for analysing deviance as a property of social order. In R. A. Scott & J. D. Douglas (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on deviance (pp. 9–35). London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. Sheley, J. F. (1980). Is neutralization theory necessary for criminal behavior? Deviant Behavior, 2, 49–72.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, P. K. (1997). Bullying in life-span perspective: What can studies of school bullying and workplace bullying learn from each other? Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 249–255.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. F., & Slee, P. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Stanley, L., & Arora, T. (1998). Social exclusion among adolescent girls: Their self-esteem and coping strategies. Educational Psychology in Practice, 14, 94–100.Google Scholar
  65. Sun-Tzu (T. Cleary, Trans.). (1998[6th century B.C.]) The art of war. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  66. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97–111.Google Scholar
  67. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Socially undesirable need not be incompetent: A response to Crick and Dodge. Social Development, 8, 132–134.Google Scholar
  68. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Bullying and “theory of mind”: A critique of the “social status deficit” view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127.Google Scholar
  69. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.Google Scholar
  70. Tannenbaum, F. (1951). Crime and the community. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  71. Tattum, D., & Herbert, G. (Eds.) (1997). Bullying: Home, school and community. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  72. Terry, A. A. (1998). Teachers as targets of bullying by their pupils: A study to investigate incidence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 255–268.Google Scholar
  73. Thompson, W. E., & Harred, J. L. (1992). Topless dancers. Deviant Behavior, 13, 291–311.Google Scholar
  74. Thurman, Q. C., St. John, C., & Riggs, L. (1984). Neutralization and tax evasion: How effective would a moral appeal be in improving compliance to tax laws? Law and Policy, 6, 309–328.Google Scholar
  75. Tomita, S. K. (1990). The denial of elder mistreatment by victims and abusers: The application of neutralization theory. Violence and Victims, 5, 171–184.Google Scholar
  76. Victoria. (1978). Report of the Board of Inquiry into allegations against members of the Victoria Police Force. Melbourne: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  77. Vitell, S. J., & Grove, S. J. (1987). Marketing ethics and the techniques of neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 433–438.Google Scholar
  78. Weber, M. (E. Fischoff, Trans.) (1968[1922]). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterloo, OntarioCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterloo, OntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations