Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 501–515 | Cite as

Behavioral Sabotage of Plant Defense: Do Vein Cuts and Trenches Reduce Insect Exposure to Exudate?

  • David E. Dussourd
Article

Abstract

Many insect folivores sever veins or cut trenches before feeding on leaves that emit fluid from latex, resin, or phloem canals. The behaviors reportedly function to reduce the insect's exposure to exudate. This hypothesis was tested with three species that sever leaf midribs and two species that trench. In each case, the insect's cuts reduced exudation at the distal feeding site by at least 94% relative to an adjacent control leaf. However, most of the insects contacted exudate during the vein-cutting/trenching operation, which could potentially negate any benefits received during feeding. To estimate how much exudate red milkweed beetles (Tetraopes tetrophthalmus) ingest, I weighed beetles before and after vein cutting, and simulated beetle feeding on leaves with and without vein cuts. By severing veins, the beetles decreased their total ingestion of exudate by at least 92%.

vein-cutting leaf trenching laticifer phloem plant–insect interactions Tetraopes tetrophthalmus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abacus Concepts (1992). StatView, Abacus Concepts, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  2. Ackery, P. R., and Vane-Wright, R. I. (1984). Milkweed Butterflies: Their Cladistics and Biology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Becerra, J. X. (1994). Squirt-gun defense in Bursera and the chrysomelid counterploy. Ecology 75: 1991–1996.Google Scholar
  4. Borkin, S. (1993). Rejection of Apocynum androsaemifolium and A. sibiricum (Apocynaceae) as food plants by larvae of Danaus plexippus: Refutation of early accounts. In Malcolm, S. B., and Zalucki, M. P. (eds.), Biology and Conservation of the Monarch Butterfly, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, pp. 125–128.Google Scholar
  5. Brewer, J. (1977). Short lived phenomena. News Lepid. Soc. 4: 7.Google Scholar
  6. Brower, L. P., Nelson, C. J., Seiber, J. N., Fink, L. S., and Bond, C. (1988). Exaptation as an alternative to coevolution in the cardenolide-based chemical defense of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) against avian predators. In Spencer, K. C. (ed.), Chemical Mediation of Coevolution, Academic Press, New York, pp. 447–475.Google Scholar
  7. Buttery, B. R., and Boatman, S. G. (1976). Water deficits and flow of latex. In Kozlowski, T. T. (ed.), Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol. IV, Academic Press, New York, pp. 233–289.Google Scholar
  8. Chemsak, J. A. (1963). Taxonomy and bionomics of the genus Tetraopes (Cerambycidae: Coleoptera). Calif. Univ. Publ. Entomol. 30: 1–89.Google Scholar
  9. Compton, S. G. (1987). Aganais speciosa and Danaus chrysippus (Lepidoptera) sabotage the latex defences of their host plants. Ecol. Entomol. 12: 115–118.Google Scholar
  10. Crafts, A. S., and Crisp, C. E. (1971). Phloem Transport in Plants, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. d'Auzac, J., Jacob, J., and Chrestin, H. (1989). Physiology of Rubber Tree Latex, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  12. Dickinson, J. L. (1996). The behavior and ecology of Labidomera Chevrolat (Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae). In Jolivet, P. H. A., and Cox, M. L. (eds.), Chrysomelidae Biology, Vol. 2. Ecological Studies, SPB Academic, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Dillon, P. M., Lowrie, S., and McKey, D. (1983). Disarming the “Evil Woman”: Petiole constriction by a sphingid larva circumvents mechanical defenses of its host plant, Cnidoscolus urens (Euphorbiaceae). Biotropica 15: 112–116.Google Scholar
  14. Duffey, S. S., and Scudder, G. G. E. (1972). Cardiac glycosides in North American Asclepiadaceae, a basis for unpalatability in brightly coloured Hemiptera and Coleoptera. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 63–78.Google Scholar
  15. Dussourd, D. E. (1993). Foraging with finesse: Caterpillar adaptations for circumventing plant defenses. In Stamp, N. E., and Casey, T. (eds.), Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 92–131.Google Scholar
  16. Dussourd, D. E. (1995). Entrapment of aphids and whiteflies in lettuce latex. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 88: 163–172.Google Scholar
  17. Dussourd, D. E., and Denno, R. F. (1991). Deactivation of plant defense: Correspondence between insect behavior and secretory canal architecture. Ecology 72: 1383–1396.Google Scholar
  18. Dussourd, D. E., and Denno, R. F. (1994). Host range of generalist caterpillars: Trenching permits feeding on plants with secretory canals. Ecology 75: 69–78.Google Scholar
  19. Dussourd, D. E., and Eisner, T. (1987). Vein-cutting behavior: Insect counterploy to the latex defense of plants. Science 237: 898–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Eichlin, T. D., and Cunningham, H. B. (1978). The Plusiinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of America north of Mexico, emphasizing genitalic and larval morphology. U.S. Dep. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1567: 1–122.Google Scholar
  21. Eickwort, K. R. (1977). Population dynamics of a relatively rare species of milkweed beetle (Labidomera). Ecology 58: 527–538.Google Scholar
  22. Eschrich, W., Evert, R. F., and Heyser, W. (1971). Proteins of the sieve-tube exudate of Cucurbita maxima. Planta 100: 208–221.Google Scholar
  23. Fahn, A. (1979). Secretory Tissues in Plants, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Farrell, B. D., Dussourd, D. E., and Mitter, C. (1991). Escalation of plant defense: Do latex/resin canals spur plant diversification? Am. Nat. 138: 891–900.Google Scholar
  25. Gonzalez, A. G. (1977). Lactuceae—Chemical review. In Heywood, V.H., and Harborne, J. B. (eds.), The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1081–1095.Google Scholar
  26. Lewinsohn, T. M. (1991). The geographical distribution of plant latex. Chemoecology 2: 64–68.Google Scholar
  27. MacGibbon, D. B., and Mann, J. D. (1986). Inhibition of animal and pathogenic fungal proteases by phloem exudate from pumpkin fruits (Cucurbitaceae). J. Sci. Food Agr. 37: 515–522.Google Scholar
  28. Malcolm, S. B. (1995). Milkweeds, monarch butterflies and the ecological significance of cardenolides. Chemoecology 5/6: 101–117.Google Scholar
  29. McCloud, E. S., Tallamy, D. W., and Halaweish, F. T. (1995). Squash beetle trenching behavior: Avoidance of cucurbitacin induction or mucilaginous plant sap? Ecol. Entomol. 20: 51–59.Google Scholar
  30. Metcalfe, C. R., and Chalk, L. (1983). Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, Vol. II, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Nelson, C. J., Seiber, J. N., and Brower, L. P. (1981). Seasonal and intraplant variation of cardenolide content in the California milkweed, Asclepias eriocarpa, and implications for plant defense. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 981–1010.Google Scholar
  32. Raffa, K. F. (1991). Induced defensive reactions in conifer-bark beetle systems. In Tallamy, D. W., and Raupp, M. J. (eds.), Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 245–276.Google Scholar
  33. Read, S. M., and Northcote, D. H. (1983). Chemical and immunological similarities between the phloem proteins of three genera of the Cucurbitaceae. Planta 158: 119–127.Google Scholar
  34. Rees, S. B., and Harborne, J. B. (1985). The role of sesquiterpene lactones and phenolics in the chemical defence of the chicory plant. Phytochemistry 24: 2225–2231.Google Scholar
  35. Seiber, J. N., Nelson, C. J., and Lee, S. M. (1982). Cardenolides in the latex and leaves of seven Asclepias species and Calotropis procera. Phytochemistry 21: 2343–2348.Google Scholar
  36. Sharma, J. R., and Gupta, M. M. (1994). Genetic and chemical analysis for alkaloids in Papaver. In Linskens, H. F., and Jackson, J. F. (eds.), Alkaloids, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 215–234.Google Scholar
  37. Stark, R. W. (1965). Recent trends in forest entomology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10: 303–324.Google Scholar
  38. Sutherland, D. W. S., and Greene, G. L. (1984). Cultivated and wild host plants. In Lingren, P. D., and Green, G. L. (eds.), Suppression and management of cabbage looper populations. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1684: 1–13.Google Scholar
  39. Tallamy, D. W. (1985). Squash beetle feeding behavior: An adaptation against induced cucurbit defenses. Ecology 66: 1574–1579.Google Scholar
  40. Tallamy, D. W. (1986). Behavioral adaptations in insects to plant allelochemicals. In Brattsten, L. B., and Ahmad, S. (eds.), Molecular Aspects of Insect-Plant Associations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 273–300.Google Scholar
  41. Wilkins, M. B. (ed.) (1984). Advanced Plant Physiology, Pitman, Marshfield, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Zalucki, M. P., and Brower, L. P. (1992). Survival of first instar larvae of Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danainae) in relation to cardiac glycoside and latex content of Asclepias humistrata (Asclepiadaceae). Chemoecology 3: 81–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Dussourd
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Central ArkansasConway

Personalised recommendations