## Abstract

Hyperbolic vectors are called gyrovectors. We show that the Bloch vector of quantum mechanics is a gyrovector. The Bures fidelity between two states of a qubit is generated by two Bloch vectors. Treating these as gyrovectors rather than vectors results in our novel expression for the Bures fidelity, expressed in terms of its two generating Bloch gyrovectors. Taming the Thomas precession of Einstein's special theory of relativity led to the advent of the theory of gyrogroups and gyrovector spaces. Gyrovector spaces, in turn, form the setting for various models of the hyperbolic geometry of Bolyai and Lobachevski just as vector spaces form the setting for the standard model of Euclidean geometry. It is the recent advent of the theory of gyrogroups and gyrovector spaces that allows the Bures fidelity to be studied in its natural context, hyperbolic geometry, resulting in our new representation of the Bures fidelity, that reveals simplicity, elegance, and hyperbolic geometric significance.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## REFERENCES

- 1.A. A. Ungar,
*Beyond the Einstein Addition Law and Its Gyroscopic Thomas Precession: The Theory of Gyrogroups and Gyrovector Spaces*(Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht/Boston/ London, 2001).Google Scholar - 2.K. Blum,
*Density Matrix Theory and Applications*(Plenum, New York, 1996), 2nd edn.Google Scholar - 3.H. Urbantke, “Two-level quantum systems: States, phases, and holonomy,”;
*Amer. J. Phys.***56**, 503–509 (1991).Google Scholar - 4.J.-L. Chen, L. Fu, A. Ungar, and X.-G. Zhao, “Geometric observation of Bures fidelity between two states of a qubit,”;
*Phys. Rev. A (3)***65**, 024303, 3 (2002).Google Scholar - 5.J.-L. Chen, L. Fu, A. Ungar, and X.-G. Zhao, “Degree of entanglement for two qubits,”;
*Phys. Rev. A (3)***65**(2002), in print.Google Scholar - 6.F. J. Bloore, “Geometrical description of the convex sets of states for systems with spin-1/2 and spin-1,”;
*J. Phys. A***9**, 2059–2067 (1976).Google Scholar - 7.K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, “Volume of the set of separable states,”;
*Phys. Rev. A (3)***58**, 883–892 (1998).Google Scholar - 8.P. B. Slater, “A priori probabilities of separable quantum states,”;
*J. Phys. A***32**, 5261–5275 (1999).Google Scholar - 9.P. B. Slater, “Comparative noninformativities of quantum priors based on monotone metrics,”;
*Phys. Lett. A***247**, 1–8 (1998).Google Scholar - 10.A. Uhlmann, “Parallel transport and ‘quantum holonomy’ along density operators,”;
*Rep. Math. Phys.***24**, 229–240 (1986).Google Scholar - 11.A. Uhlmann, Parallel lifts and holonomy along density operators: computable examples using oi(3)-orbits, in
*Symmetries in Science, VI (Bregenz, 1992)*(Plenum, New York, 1993), pp. 741–748.Google Scholar - 12.A. Uhlmann, Parallel transport and holonomy along density operators, in
*Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics (Clausthal, 1986)*(Teaneck, NJ), pp. 246–254 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).Google Scholar - 13.M. Hübner, “Computation of Uhlmann's parallel transport for density matrices and the Bures metric on three-dimensional Hilbert space,”;
*Phys. Lett. A***179**, 226–230 (1993).Google Scholar - 14.
- 15.X. Wang, “Quantum teleportation of entangled coherent states,”;
*Phys. Rev. A (3)***64**, 022302, 4 (2001).Google Scholar - 16.V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, “Quantifying entanglement,”;
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***78**, 2275–2279 (1997).Google Scholar - 17.M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,
*Quantum Computation and Quantum Information*(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar - 18.V. Fock,
*The Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation*(MacMillan, New York, 1964), 2nd revised edn., translated from the Russian by N. Kemmer (a Pergamon Press book).Google Scholar - 19.A. Einstein, “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper [On the electrodynamics of Moving bodies],”;
*Ann. Physik (Leipzig)***17**, 891–921 (1905).Google Scholar - 20.A. Einstein,
*The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2: The Swiss Years: Writings, 1900–1909*, John Stachel, ed., translation from the German by Anna Beck (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989).Google Scholar - 21.V. Varičak, “Anwendung der Lobatschefskjschen Geometrie in der Relativtheorie,”;
*Physik. Z.***11**, 93–96 (1910).Google Scholar - 22.V. Varičak,
*Darstellung der Redativitdtstheorie im dreidimensionalen Lobatchefskijschen Raume [Presentation of the Theory of Relativity in the Three-dimensional Lobachevskian Space]*(Zaklada, Zagreb, 1924).Google Scholar - 23.J.-l. Chen and A. A. Ungar, “From the group SL(2, c) to gyrogroups and gyrovector spaces and hyperbolic geometry,”;
*Found. Phys.***31**, 1611–1639 (2001).Google Scholar - 24.H. Goldstein,
*Classical Mechanics*(Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1980), 2nd edn.Google Scholar - 25.J. D. Jackson,
*Classical Electrodynamics*(John Wiley, New York, 1975), second edn.Google Scholar - 26.D. Bures, “An extension of Kakutani's theorem on infinite product measures to the tensor product of semifinite
*W**-algebras,”;*Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.***135**, 199–212 (1969).Google Scholar - 27.
- 28.J. Twamley, “Bures and statistical distance for squeezed thermal states,”;
*J. Phys. A***29**, 3723–3731 (1996).Google Scholar - 29.M. B. Ruskai, “Beyond strong subadditivity? Improved bounds on the contraction of generalized relative entropy,”;
*Rev. Math. Phys.***6**(5A), 1147–1161 (1994), with an appendix on applications to logarithmic Sobolev inequalities (special issue dedicated to Elliott H. Lieb).Google Scholar - 30.C. A. Fuchs, Ph.D. thesis (University of Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 1996); arXive e-print quantph/9601020.Google Scholar
- 31.H. Scutaru, “Fidelity for displaced squeezed thermal states and the oscillator semigroup,”;
*J. Phys. A***31**, 3659–3663 (1998).Google Scholar - 32.E. Knill and R. Laflamme, “Theory of quantum error-correcting codes,”;
*Phys. Rev. A (3)***55**, 900–911 (1997).Google Scholar - 33.H. Barnum, E. Knill, and M. A. Nielsen, “On quantum fidelities and channel capacities,”;
*IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory***46**(4), 1317–1329 (2000); see arXive e-print quant-ph/ 9809010.Google Scholar - 34.S. Kakutani, “On equivalence of infinite product measures,”;
*Ann. of Math. (2)***49**, 214–224 (1948).Google Scholar - 35.J. Dittmann and A. Uhlmann, “Connections and metrics respecting purification of quantum states,”;
*J. Math. Phys.***40**, 3246–3267 (1999).Google Scholar - 36.D. Petz and C. Sudár, “Geometries of quantum states,”;
*J. Math. Phys.***37**, 2662–2673 (1996).Google Scholar - 37.A. Uhlmann, “A gauge field governing parallel transport along mixed states,”;
*Lett. Math. Phys.***21**, 229–236 (1991).Google Scholar - 38.A. Uhlmann, “Density operators as an arena for differential geometry,”; in
*Proceedings of the XXV Symposium on Mathematical Physics (Toruń, 1992)***33**, 253–263 (1993).Google Scholar - 39.M. Hübner, “Explicit computation of the Bures distance for density matrices,”;
*Phys. Lett. A***163**, 239–242 (1992).Google Scholar - 40.M. Hübner, “The Bures metric and Uhlmann's transition probability: explicit results,”; in
*Classical and Quantum Systems (Goslar, 1991)*(World Scientific, Singapore, 1993), pp. 406–409.Google Scholar - 41.J. Dittmann and G. Rudolph, “On a connection governing parallel transport along 2×2 density matrices,”;
*J. Geom. Phys.***10**, 93–106 (1992).Google Scholar - 42.J. Dittmann and G. Rudolph, “A class of connections governing parallel transport along density matrices,”;
*J. Math. Phys.***33**, 4148–4154 (1992).Google Scholar - 43.J. Dittmann, “On the Riemannian geometry of finite-dimensional mixed states,”;
*Sem. Sophus Lie***3**, 73–87 (1993).Google Scholar - 44.J. Dittmann, “Explicit formulae for the Bures metric,”;
*J. Phys. A***32**, 2663–2670 (1999).Google Scholar - 45.A. A. Ungar, “Thomas rotation and the parametrization of the Lorentz transformation group,”;
*Found. Phys. Lett.***1**, 57–89 (1988).Google Scholar - 46.A. A. Ungar, “Seeing the Möbius disc-transformation like never before,”;
*Comput. Math. Appl.***42**(2002), in print.Google Scholar - 47.A. A. Ungar, “Thomas precession: its underlying gyrogroup axioms and their use in hyperbolic geometry and relativistic physics,”;
*Found. Phys.***27**, 881–951 (1997).Google Scholar - 48.L. Fuchs,
*Abelian Groups*(Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1958).Google Scholar - 49.B. R. Ebanks and C. T. Ng, “On generalized cocycle equations,”;
*Aequationes Math.***46**, 76–90 (1993).Google Scholar - 50.H. Pollatsek, “Quantum error correction: classic group theory meets a quantum challenge,”;
*Amer Math. Monthly***108**, 932–962 (2001).Google Scholar - 51.X.-B. Wang, L. C. Kwek, and C. H. Oh, “Bures fidelity for diagonalizable quadratic Hamiltonians in multi-mode systems,”;
*J. Phys. A***33**, 4925–4934 (2000).Google Scholar - 52.J.-L. Chen, L. Fu, A. Ungar, and X.-G. Zhao, “Alternative fidelity measure between two states of an i
*n*-state quantum system,”;*Phys. Rev. A (3)***65**(2002), in print.Google Scholar