Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 45, Issue 1–3, pp 15–33 | Cite as

Understanding probabilistic thinking: The legacy of Efraim Fischbein

  • Brian Greer
Article

Abstract

The study and analysis of probabilistic thinking, in particular its development in children, is a key element in our attempts to uncover the workings of the human mind and an essential foundation for the development of effective instruction in concepts central to modern models of scientific and social phenomena. This paper honours the contribution of Efraim Fischbein, who died in July 1998, to these endeavours. The first section summarises Fischbein's early work, culminating in his 1975 book ‘The Intuitive Sources of Probabilistic Thinking in Children’. The second focusses on three major themes prominent in that book, and elaborated in later work by Fischbein and his colleagues, namely: (a) The role of intuition in mathematical and scientific thinking, (b) The development of probabilistic thinking, and (c) The influence of instruction on that development. In the final section, suggestions are made as to how Fischbein's pioneering work can be built upon, in particular for improving the teaching of probability in schools.

Keywords

Final Section Major Theme Human Mind Social Phenomenon Effective Instruction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Biehler, R.: 1993, ‘Software tools and mathematics education: The case of statistics’, in Keitel, C. and Ruthven, K. (eds.), Learning from Computers: Mathematics Education and Technology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 68–100.Google Scholar
  2. Borovcnik, M. and Bentz, H-J.: 1991, ‘Empirical research in understanding probability’, in Kapadia, R. and Borovcnik, M. (eds.), Chance Encounters: Probability in Education, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 73–105.Google Scholar
  3. Borovcnik, M. and Peard, R.: 1996, ‘Probability’, in Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 239–287.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, P.: 1989, ‘Review of intuition in science and mathematics’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20, 213–218.Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, P.: 1999, ‘Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis’, Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1, 5–43.Google Scholar
  6. Engel, A.: 1970, ‘Teaching probability in intermediate grades’, in Rade, L. (ed.), The Teaching of Probability and Statistics, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, pp. 87–150.Google Scholar
  7. Erickson, T.: 2000, Data in Depth: Exploring Mathematics with Fathom, Key Curriculum Press, Emeryville, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Fischbein, E.: 1975, The Intuitive Sources of Probabilistic Thinking in Children, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Fischbein, E.: 1987, Intuition in Science and Mathematics, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Fischbein, E.: 1990a, ‘Introduction’, in Nesher, P. and Kilpatrick, J. (eds.), Mathematics and Cognition: A Research Synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, ICMI Study Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  11. Fischbein, E.: 1990b, ‘Intuition and information processing in mathematical activity’, International Journal of Educational Research 14(1), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischbein, E.: 1999, ‘Psychology and mathematics education’, Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1, 47–58.Google Scholar
  13. Fischbein, E., Barbat, I. and Minzat, I.: 1971, Educational Studies in Mathematics 4, 264–280. [Reproduced as Appendix I in Fischbein, 1975].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischbein, E. and Gazit, A.: 1984, ‘Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischbein, E., Nello, M.S. and Marino, M.S.: 1991, ‘Factors affecting probabilistic judgment in children and adolescents’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischbein, E., Pampu, I. and Minzat, I.: 1967, ‘L'intuition probabiliste chez l'enfant’, Enfance 2, 193–206. [Reproduced as Appendix II in Fischbein, 1975].Google Scholar
  17. Fischbein, E., Pampu, I. and Minzat, I.: 1970a, ‘Comparison of ratios and the chance concept in children’, Child Development 41, 377–389. [Reproduced as Appendix III in Fischbein, 1975].Google Scholar
  18. Fischbein, E., Pampu, I. and Manzat, I.: 1970b, ‘Effects of age and instruction on combinatory ability in children’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 40, 261–270. [Reproduced as Appendix IV in Fischbein, 1975].Google Scholar
  19. Fischbein, E. and Schnarch, D.: 1997, ‘The evolution with age of probabilistic intuitively based misconceptions’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28, 96–105.Google Scholar
  20. Greer, B. and Verschaffel, L.: 1990, ‘Introduction’, International Journal of Educational Research 14(1), 3–12. [Special Issue on ‘Mathematics education as a proving-ground for information-processing theories’].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howson, G.: 1991, National Curricula in Mathematics, The Mathematical Association, London.Google Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1982, ‘On the study of statistical intuitions’, in Kahnemann, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky. A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.493–508.Google Scholar
  23. Kaput, J.J. and Balacheff, N.: 1996, ‘Computer-based learning environments in mathematics’, in Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 469–501.Google Scholar
  24. Konold, C.: 1991, ‘Understanding students beliefs about probability’, in von Glasersfeld, E. (ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar
  25. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B.: 1975, The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, [English translation, originally published in 1951].Google Scholar
  26. Rav, Y.: 1993, ‘Philosophical problems of mathematics in the light of evolutionary epistemology’, in Restivo, S., van Bendegem, J.P. and Fischer, R. (eds.), Math Worlds: Philosophical and Social Studies of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, pp. 80–109.Google Scholar
  27. Ritson, R.: 1998, The Development of Primary School Children's Understanding of Probability, Unpublished thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
  28. Shaughnessy, M.: 1992, ‘Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions’, in Grouws, D.A. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 465–494.Google Scholar
  29. Stavy, R. and Tirosh, D.: 1994, ‘The intuitive rule “The more of A – the more of B”’, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, IGPME Program Committee, Lisbon, Portugal, 4, pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
  30. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1982, ‘Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability’, in Kahnemann, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 207–232.Google Scholar
  31. von Glasersfeld, E.: 1990, ‘An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical’, in Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A. and Noddings, N. (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Greer
    • 1
  1. 1.San Diego State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations