Advertisement

Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 417–433 | Cite as

Electronic decision-making for developing countries

  • Dietrich Splettstoesser
Article

Abstract

Political, economic and social development requires "good governance" and intelligent decision-making. Development decision centers (DDC) equipped with appropriate information technology (IT) can help to improve development decisions, increase effectiveness and efficiency of public and private administration and support democratization and political stability.

DDC provide IT-based facilities for brainstorming, discussion, organization and evaluation of ideas, objectives, strategies, projects, etc. They can be integrated into community information centers or established within government agencies, business corporations, universities and other institutions of higher learning to offer assistance in solving complex development problems that require close collaboration of decision-makers and experts.

The paper analyzes political, socio-cultural and economic development problems, and suggests to use appropriate IT and group support systems as an innovative strategy to overcome such problems. It demonstrates the proposed approach by presenting typical steps and results of development planning in a DDC, the author has built up at the University of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. This center is believed to be the first in Africa and may be considered as a prototype of a DDC which could become a standard facility in community information centers to help integrate improve effectiveness, efficiency, transparency and accountability of development decision-making.

development planning decision-making group support systems computer supported collaborative work electronic meetings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, M. et al. (1995). “A Korean Group Decision-Support System”, Information and Management 28, 303–310.Google Scholar
  2. Blunt, P. (1995). “Cultural Relativism, Good Governance and Sustainable Human Development”, Public Administration and Development 15, 1–9.Google Scholar
  3. Camacho, L.M., and P.B. Paulus. (1995). “The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 1071–1080.Google Scholar
  4. Enterprise Solutions Inc. (1994). MeetingWorks for Windows. The Technology of Consensus. Seattle.Google Scholar
  5. GTZ. (1983). ZOPP. Ziel-Orientierte Projekt-Planung. Eschborn.Google Scholar
  6. Hakken, D. (1991). “Culture-Centered Computing – Social-Policy and Development of New Information Technology in England and the United States”, Human Organization 50, 406–423.Google Scholar
  7. Hofstede, G. (1983). “The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories”, Journal of International Business Studies 14, 75–89.Google Scholar
  8. Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultures and Organizations. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Kraemer, K., V. Gurbaxani, and J. King. (1992). “Economic Development, Government Policy, and Diffusion of Computing in Asia-Pacific Countries”, Public Administration Review 52.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, L.F. (1982). Facilitator: A Microcomputer Decision Support System for Small Groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, L.F. (1994). A Brief Introduction to Group Support Systems. Bellingham: MeetingWorks AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  12. McNurlin, B. C., and R.H. Sprague. (1989). Information Systems Management in Practice, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Pava, C. (1982). “Microelectronics and the Design of Organization”, Working Paper No. HBS 82-67, Harvard Business School, Division of Research, Soldier Field, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. PCI. (1970). The Logical Framework. A Manager's Guide to a Scientific Approach to Design and Evaluation. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Petrovic, O., and O. Krickl. (1993). “Traditionell-moderiertes vs. computergestütztes Brainstorming. Eine vergleichende Betrachtung, Wirtschaftsinformatik 2, 120–128.Google Scholar
  16. Pliskin, N. et al. (1993). “Presumed Versus Actual Organizational Culture – Managerial Implications for Implementation of Information-Systems”, Computer Journal 36, 143–152.Google Scholar
  17. Roberts, A. (ed.) (1968). Tanzania before 1900. Nairobi: East African Publishing House.Google Scholar
  18. Talero, E., and P. Gaudette, (1995). Harnessing Information for Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  19. WorldBank. (1992). World Development Report 1992. Development and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. WorldBank. (1996). “Information For Development Program (infoDev). Guidelines for Activity Proposals. Washington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietrich Splettstoesser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General ManagementUniversity of Dar Es SalaamDar Es Salaam

Personalised recommendations