Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 438, Issue 1–3, pp 99–105 | Cite as

Taxonomic re-evaluation of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae NH-5 based on morphology and 16S rRNA gene sequences

  • Renhui Li
  • Wayne W. Carmichael
  • Yongding Liu
  • Makoto M. Watanabe
Article

Abstract

The taxonomy of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae strain NH-5, a producer of cyanotoxins, was re-evaluated by comparison with six other Aphanizomenon strains using morphological characteristics and 16S rRNA gene sequences. Strain NH-5 was concluded to be improperly identified as Aph. flos-aquae based upon (1) lack of bundle formation in the trichomes, (2) location of akinetes next to heterocytes, (3) lower similarities (less than 97.5%) in the 16S rRNA gene sequences relative to Aph. flos-aquae strains, and (4) comparison within a phylogenetic tree constructed from 16S rRNA gene sequences. The Aphanizomenon strains investigated in this study are classified to four morphological groups as described by the classical taxonomy of Komárek & Kovácik (1989). This classification was supported from the phylogenetic results of 16S rRNA gene sequences. This study also discusses the generic boundaries between Aphanizomenon and Anabaena.

Aphanizomenon Cyanobacteria 16S rRNA morphology sequences taxonomy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alam, M., Y. Shimizu, M. Ikawa & J. J. Jr Sasner, 1978. Reinvestigation of the toxin from blue-green alga Aphanizomenon flos-aquae by a high performance chromatographic method. J. Envir. Sci. Hlth A13: 493 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers & D. J. Lipman, 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, K. K., 1981. Ecology and taxonomy of five natural populations of the genus Aphanizomenon Morren (Cyanophyceae). Arch. Hydrobiol. 92: 222–251.Google Scholar
  4. Fjerdingstad, E., 1966. Cell dimensions of some members of Aphanizomenon Morren (Cyanophyceae). Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 28: 133–147.Google Scholar
  5. Horecká, M. & J. Komárek, 1979. Taxonomic position of three planktonic blue-green algae from the genera Aphanizomenon and Cylindrospermopsis. Preslia 51: 289–312.Google Scholar
  6. Ikawa, M., K. Wegener, T. L. Foxall & J. J. Sasner, Jr. 1982. Comparison of the toxins of the blue-green Aphanizomenon flos-aquae with the Gonyaulax toxins. Toxicon 20: 747.Google Scholar
  7. Komárek, J., 1958. Die taxonomische Revision der planktischen Blaualgen der Tschechoslowakei. In Komárek, J. & H. Ettl (eds), Algologische Studien, Tschechosl. Akad. Wissensch, Prague: 10–206.Google Scholar
  8. Komárek, J. & L. Kovácik, 1989. Trichomes structure of four Aphanizomenon taxa (Cyanophyceae) from Czechoslovakia, with notes on the taxonomy and delimitation of the genus. Pl. Syst. Evol. 164: 47–64.Google Scholar
  9. Komárková, J., 1983. Factors influencing the development of Aphanizomenon flos-aquae bloom in Czechoslovak eutrophic fish ponds. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 45: 301–306.Google Scholar
  10. Li, R., A. Yokota, J. Sugiyama, M. Watanabe, M. Hiroki & M. M. Watanabe, 1998. Chemotaxonomy of planktonic cyanobacteria based on non-polar and 3-hydroxy fatty acid composition. Phycol. Res. 46: 21–28.Google Scholar
  11. Mahmood, N. A. & W. W. Carmichael, 1986. Paralytic shellfish poisons produced by the freshwater cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae NH-5. Toxicon 24: 175–186.Google Scholar
  12. Park, H-K, S-U. Cheon, I-N. Jin & J-K. Ryu, 1997. A study on the distribution of cyanobacterial strains and microcystins in Korean freshwater. Proc. Asian Water Quality 2: 1035–1043.Google Scholar
  13. Rapala, J., K. Sivonen, C. Lyra & S. I. Niemelä, 1993. Anatoxina concentration in Anabaena and Aphanizomenon at different environmental conditions and comparison of growth by toxic and non-toxic Anabaena strains, a laboratory study. Apl. envir. Microbiol. 64: 2206–2212.Google Scholar
  14. Reynolds, C. S., 1984. The Ecology of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/London/New York/New Rochelle/Melbourne/Sydney: 384 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Rudi, K., O. L. Skulberg, F. Larsen & K. S. Jakobsen, 1997. Strain characterization and classification of oxyphotobacteria in clone culture on the basis of 16S rRNA sequences from the variable region V6, V7 and V8. Apl. envir. Microbiol. 63: 2593–2599.Google Scholar
  16. Sawyer, P. J., J. H. Gentile & J. J. Sasner, Jr., 1968. Demonstration of a toxin from Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (L.) Ralfs. Can. J. Microbiol. 14: 1199.Google Scholar
  17. Stackebrandt, E. & B. M. Goebel, 1994. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44: 846–849.Google Scholar
  18. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins & T. J. Gibson, 1994. CLASTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673–4680.Google Scholar
  19. Watanabe, M., 1991. Studies on the planktonic Blue-green Algae 3. Some Aphanizomenon species in Hollaido, Northern Japan. Bull. natn. Sci. Mus., Tokyo, Ser. B 17: 141–150.Google Scholar
  20. Watanabe, M. M. & M. Hiroki, 1997. NIES-Collection. List of Strains, Algae and Protozoa 5th edn. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Environment Agency, Japan: 140 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Wayne L. G., D. J. Brenner, R. R. Colwell, P. A. D. Grimont, O. Kandler, M. I. Krichevsky, L. H. Moore, W. E. C. Moore, R. G. E. Murray, E. Stackebrandt, M. P. Starr & H. G. Truper, 1987. Report of Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 37: 463–464.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renhui Li
    • 1
  • Wayne W. Carmichael
    • 2
  • Yongding Liu
    • 3
  • Makoto M. Watanabe
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWright State UniversityDaytonU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesWright State UniversityDaytonU.S.A.
  3. 3.Institute of Hydrobiologythe Chinese Academy of SciencesWuhanP. R. China
  4. 4.National Institute for Environmental StudiesIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations