Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 353–366 | Cite as

Protestants and Family Planning

  • Patricia Goodson


There is evidence supporting the hypothesis that the historically favorable views of Protestants regarding the practice of family planning are changing among selected sub-groups. Such an attitudinal shift among Protestants has been rarely investigated by social scientists. This literature review represents an initial step in examining the phenomenon. A profile of Protestants' historical views of family planning will be presented first, followed by a discussion of the recent questioning of this group's favorable attitudes towards the practice. Additionally, research literature on contraceptive behavior and fertility patterns will provide empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis.


Social Scientist Empirical Evidence Family Planning Initial Step Research Literature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Marcum, J. P. (1981), “Explaining Fertility Differences among U.S. Protestants,” Social Forces, 60, pp. 532–543.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marcum, J. P. (1986), “Explaining Protestant Fertility: Belief, Commitment, and Homogamy.” The Sociological Quarterly, 27, pp. 547–558.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mosher, W. D. and McNally, J. W. (1991), “Contraceptive Use at First Premarital Intercourse: United States, 1965–1988.” Family Planning Perspectives, 23, pp. 108–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B. and Johnson, D. P. (1992), “Religion and Fertility in the United States: New Patterns,” Demography, 29, pp. 199–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pride, M. (1985), The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality. Westchester, IL: Crossway Books, p. 29.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodson, P. (1996), “Protestant Seminary Students' Views of Family Planning and Intention to Promote Family Planning through Education.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, Austin, Texas, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dienes, C. T. (1972), Law, Politics, and Birth Control. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doriani, D. (1993), “Birth Dearth or Bring on the Babies? Biblical Perspectives on Family Planning.” The Journal of Biblical Counseling, XII, pp. 24–35.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schnucker, R. V. (1975), “Elizabethan Birth Control and Puritan Attitudes.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 4, pp. 655–667.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibid., p.661.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morgan, E. S. (1942), “The Puritans and Sex.” The New England Quarterly, XV, pp. 591–607.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sweet, L. I. (1994), Health and Medicine in the Evangelical Tradition: “Not by Might nor Power,” Chicago, IL: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parkerson, D. H. and Parkerson, J. A. (1988), ‘Fewer Children of Greater Spiritual Quality’ Religion and the Decline of Fertility in Nineteenth-century America. Social Science History, 12, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parkerson, D. H. and Parkerson, J. A., p. 50.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibid., p. 57.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibid., pp. 57–59.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dienes, C. T., p. 93.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Graebner, A. (1980), “Birth Control and the Lutherans: The Missouri Synod as a Case Study,” in James, J. W., ed., Women in American Religion, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Asbell, B. (1995), The Pill: a Biography of the Drug that Changed the World, New York: Random House, p. 53.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reed, J. (1978), From Private vice to Public Virtue: the Birth Control Movement and American Society since 1830. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    John-Stevas, N. (1971), The Agonizing Choice: Birth Control, Religion and the Law. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ibid., p. 82.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fagley, R. M. (1967), “Doctrines and Attitudes of Major Religions in Regard to Fertility.” United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Proceedings of the World Population Conference-30 August-10 September 1965, pp. 78–84. Belgrade.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spitzer, W. O. and Carlyle, L. S. (1969), Birth Control and the Christian: A Protestant Symposium on the Control of Human Reproduction, Wheaton: Tyndale House, p. xxv.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mathews, A. H. (1967), “Birth control: Which Methods Are Moral?.” Christianity Today, 11, pp. 43–45.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyers, J. J. (1988), “Does the Bible Forbid Family Planning? A Biblical and Theological Evaluation of Mary Pride's Arguments against all Forms of Birth Control in Her Book “The Way Home.” The Counsel of Chalcedon, p. 21.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vincent, M. O. (1968), “A Christian View of Contraception.” Christianity Today, 13, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Assembly Committee on Human Sexuality (1991). Presbyterians and Human Sexuality: the 203rd General Assembly (1991): Response of the Report of the Special Committee on Human Sexuality, Including a “Minority Report”. Louisville, KY: Office of the General Assembly, Presbyterian Church (USA), p. 83.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Freedman, R., Whelpton, P. K. and Cambell, A. A. (1959), Family Planning, Sterility and Population Growth. New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 160–161.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mercier, J. M. (1984), “Family Planning Education: How Do Adults Feel About It?” Family Relations, 33, pp. 523–530.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Allen, J. E. and College, S. (1967), “Family Planning Attitudes of Seminary Students.” Review of Religious Research, 9, pp. 52–55.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Allen, J. E. and Cole, L. P. (1975), “Differences in Predominant Family Planning Attitudes and Experiences of Seminary Students: A Ten-year Assessment.” Review of Religious Research, 17, pp. 68–73.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    CT Institute (1991), “Is Birth Control Christian?” Christianity Today, p. 34.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Provan, C. D. (1989), The Bible and Birth Control, Monogahela, PA: Zimmer Printing, p. 3.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morecraft III, J. (1989), “The Bible on Large Families.” The Counsel of Chalcedon, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Concerned Women for America. (1993), “They'll Learn How to Use a Condom before they Learn to Multiply.” Christianity Today, September 13, p. 17.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Christenson, L. and Christenson, N. (1978), “Contraception: Blessing or Blight?.” International Review of Natural Family Planning, II, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schamp, R. O., McGaughran, A. L., Lang, S. and Doughty, P. F. (1993), “The case against the Use of Oral Contraceptives.” Journal of Biblical Ethics in Medicine, 7, pp. 76–77.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kuhar, B M. (1988), “Pharmaceutical Companies: The New Abortionists.” Human Life International, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goldscheider, C. and Mosher, W D. (1991), “Patterns of Contraceptive Use in the United States: The Importance of Religious Factors.” Studies in Family Planning, 22, pp. 102–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kahn, J., Rindfuss, R. and Guilkey, D. (1991), “Adolescent Contraceptive Method Choices.” Demography, 27, p. 323.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mosher, W. D. and McNally, J. W. (1991), Op. cit., pp. 108–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Doriani, D., Op. cit., p. 26.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pride, M., Op. cit. Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ibid., p. 25–26, 29.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Doriani, D., Op. cit. Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ellison, C.G. and Goodson, P. (1997), “Conservative Protestantism and attitudes toward family planning in a sample of seminarians, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, December.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Westoff, C. F. and Jones, E. F. (1979), “The End of Catholic Fertility.” Demography, 16, pp. 209–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mosher, W. D. and Hendershot, G. E. (1984), “Religious Affiliation and the Fertility of Married Couples.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, pp. 671–677.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mosher, W. D., Johnson, D. P. and Horn, M. C. (1986), “Religion and Fertility in the United States: The Importance of Marriage Patterns and Hispanic Origin.” Demography, 23, pp. 367–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B. and Johnson, D P., Op. cit. Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marcum, J. P. (1981), “Explaining Fertility Differences among US Protestants.” Social Forces, 60, pp. 532–543.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
  56. 56.
    Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B. and Johnson, D. P., Op. cit. Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Roof, W. C. and McKinney, W. (1987), American Mainline Religion: Its Changing Shape and Future, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Smith, T. W. (1990), “Classifying Protestant Denominations.” Review of Religious Research, 31, pp. 225–245.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gay, D. A. and Ellison, C. G. (1993), “Religious Subcultures and Political Tolerance: Do Denominations Still matter?” Review of Religious Research, 34, pp. 311–332.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ellison, C. G. and Sherkat, D. E. (1993), “Conservative Protestantism and Support for Corporal Punishment.” American Sociological Review, 58, pp. 131–144.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bartkowski, J. P. and Ellison, C. G. (1995), “Divergent Models of Childrearing in Popular Manuals: Conservative Protestants vs. the Mainstream Experts.” Sociology of Religion, 56, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bartkowski, J. P. (1995), “Spare the Rod..., or Spare the Child? Divergent perspectives on Conservative Protestant Child Discipline.” Review of Religious Research, 37, pp. 97–115.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ellison, C. G. and Musick, M. A. (1995), “Conservative Protestantism and Public Opinion Toward Science.” Review of Religious Research, 36, pp. 245–262.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Mosher, W. D and McNally, J. W., Op. cit. Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B. and Johnson, D. P., Op. cit. Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wiederman, M. W., Maynard, C. and Fretz, A. (1996), “Ethnicity in 25 Years of Published Sexuality Research: 1971–1995.” Journal of Sex Research, 33, pp. 339–342.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Elifson, K. W. and Irwin, J. (1977). “Black Ministers' Attitudes Toward Population Size and Birth Control.” Sociological Analysis, 38, pp. 252–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Blanton-Peale Institute 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Goodson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Education ofThe University of TexasSan Antonio

Personalised recommendations