Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 493–530

Accounting Returns Revisited: Evidence of their Usefulness in Estimating Economic Returns



Accounting information is used for measuring firm performance in various financial applications—a practice supported by empirical studies demonstrating the value relevance of accounting numbers, but disputed by theoretical papers arguing that a firm's accounting rate of return (ARR) serves poorly as a proxy for its internal rate of return (IRR). We derive a new model of the ARR–IRR relation, and describe how the conservatism of GAAP constrains a firm's IRR to fall in a range bounded by its historical growth rate and ARR. Using cross-sectional data, we demonstrate that economic returns can be estimated from accounting numbers for many firms. We link empirical results to underlying economic theory, and thus contribute to understanding why accounting information is value relevant.

return on investment economic profit measuring profitability value relevance accounting information 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1970). Business Combinations, APB Opinion No. 16. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, R. and P. Brown. (1968). “An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Numbers.” Journal of Accounting Research 6, 159-178.Google Scholar
  3. Beaver, W. (1968). “The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements.” Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies. Supplement to the Journal of Accounting Research 6, 67-92.Google Scholar
  4. Beaver, W. (1998). Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution. 3e. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Beaver, W., R. Lambert and D. Morse. (1980). “The Information Content of Security Prices.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 2, 3-28.Google Scholar
  6. Brief, R. and R. Lawson. (1991). “Approximate Error in Using Accounting Rates of Return to Estimate Economic Returns.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 18, 13-20.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, D. and S.P. Kothari. (1989). “An Analysis of Intertemporal and Cross-sectional Determinants of Earnings Response Coefficients.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 143-182.Google Scholar
  8. Danielson, M. and T. Dowdell. (2001). “The Return-Stages Valuation Model and the Expectations within a Firm's P/B and P/E Ratios.” Financial Management 30, 93-124.Google Scholar
  9. Feltham, G. and J. Ohlson. (1995). “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 689-731.Google Scholar
  10. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1974). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2: Accounting for Research and Development Costs. Stamford, CT: FASB.Google Scholar
  11. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1995). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121: Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. Norwalk, CT: FASB.Google Scholar
  12. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2001). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144: Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. Norwalk, CT: FASB.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, F. (1988). “Accounting Data and the Economic Performance of Firms.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 7, 253-260.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, F. and J. McGowan. (1983). “On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits.” American Economic Review 73, 82-97.Google Scholar
  15. Heckman, J. (2001). “Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture.” Journal of Political Economy 109, 673-748.Google Scholar
  16. Hotelling, H. (1925). “A General Mathematical Theory of Depreciation.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 20, 340-353.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, B. and K. Leffler. (1981). “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.” Journal of Political Economy 89, 615-641.Google Scholar
  18. Kormendi, R. and R. Lipe. (1987). “Earnings Innovations, Earnings Persistence, and Stock Returns.” Journal of Business 60, 323-345.Google Scholar
  19. Lev, B. and T. Sougiannis. (1996). “The Capitalization, Amortization, and Value-Relevance of R&D.” Journal of Accounting & Economics 21, 107-138.Google Scholar
  20. Ohlson, J. (1995). “Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 661-687.Google Scholar
  21. Peasnell, K. (1996). “Using Accounting Data to Measure the Economic Performance of Firms.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 15, 291-303.Google Scholar
  22. Penman, S. (1996). “The Articulation of Price-Earnings Ratios and Market-to-Book Ratios and the Evaluation of Growth.” Journal of Accounting Research 34, 235-259Google Scholar
  23. Penman, S. and X.-J. Zhang. (2002). “Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Returns.” Accounting Review 77, 237-264.Google Scholar
  24. Salamon, G. (1985). “Accounting Rates of Return.” American Economic Review 75, 495-504.Google Scholar
  25. Salamon, G. (1988). “On the Validity of Accounting Rates of Return in Cross-sectional Analysis: Theory, Evidence, and Implications.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 7, 267-292.Google Scholar
  26. Stewart III, G. Bennett. (1991). The Quest for Value. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  27. Weaver, S. (2001). “Measuring Economic Value Added: A Survey of the Practices of EVA® Proponents.” Journal of Applied Finance 11, 50-60.Google Scholar
  28. White, G., A. Sondhi, and D. Fried. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. 3e. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, X.-J. (2000). “Conservative Accounting and Equity Valuation.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 29, 125-149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erivan K. Haub School of BusinessSaint Joseph's UniversityPhiladelphia
  2. 2.The Fox School of BusinessTemple UniversityPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations