Cellulose

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 307–316 | Cite as

Cellulose crystallinity and ordering of hemicelluloses in pine and birch pulps as revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopic methods

  • Tiina Liitiä
  • Sirkka Liisa Maunu
  • Bo Hortling
  • Tarja Tamminen
  • Osmo Pekkala
  • Antero Varhimo
Article

Abstract

Solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the degree of cellulose crystallinity (CrI) in kraft, flow-through kraft and polysulphide–anthraquinone (PS–AQ) pulps of pine and birch containing various amounts of hemicelluloses. The applicability of acid hydrolysis and the purely spectroscopic proton spin-relaxation based spectral edition (PSRE) method to remove the interfering hemicellulose signals prior to the determination of CrI were also compared. For softwood pulps, the spectroscopic removal of hemicelluloses by PSRE was found to be more efficient than the removal of hemicelluloses by acid hydrolysis. In addition to that, the PSRE method also provides information on the associations between cellulose and hemicelluloses. On the basis of the incomplete removal of xylan from the cellulose subspectra by PSRE, the deposition of xylan on cellulose fibrils and therefore an ordered ultrastructure of xylan in birch pulps was suggested. The ordered structure of xylan in birch pulps was also supported by the observed change of xylan conformation after regeneration. Similarly, glucomannan in pine pulps may have an ordered structure. According to the 13C CPMAS measurements conducted after acid hydrolysis, the degree of cellulose crystallinity was found to be slightly lower in birch pulps than in the pine pulps. Any significant differences in cellulose crystallinity were not found between the pulps obtained by the various pulping methods. Only in pine PS–AQ pulp, the degree of cellulose crystallinity may be slightly lower than in the kraft pulps containing less hemicelluloses.

Acid hydrolysis Cellulose Crystallinity Hemicellulose Pulp Solid-state NMR spectroscopy Xylan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlgren P., Ishizu A., Szabo I. and Theander O.1968. Reactions of cellobiose or hydrocellulose in polysulphide cooking liquor. Svensk Papperstidning71: 355–357.Google Scholar
  2. åkerholm M. and Salmén L.2001. Interactions between wood polymers studied by dynamic FT-IR spectroscopy. Polymer42: 963–969.Google Scholar
  3. åkerholm M. and Salmén L.2002. Dynamic FTIR spectroscopy for carbohydrate analysis of wood pulps. J. Pulp Pap. Sci.28: 245–249.Google Scholar
  4. Evans R., Newman R.H., Roick U.C., Suckling I.D. and Wallis A.F.A.1995. Changes in cellulose crystallinity during kraft pulping. Comparison of infrared, X-ray diffraction and solid state NMR results. Holzforschung49: 498–504.Google Scholar
  5. Hattula T.1987. Crystallization and disordering of cellulose in dissolving pulp during heterogeneous acid hydrolysis. Pap. Puu69: 92–95.Google Scholar
  6. Hausalo T.1995. Analysis of wood and pulp carbohydrates by anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. 8th International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, Helsinki, Vol. 3, pp. 131–136.Google Scholar
  7. Horii F., Hirai A. and Kimaru R.1982. Solid-state high-resolution 13C-NMR studies of regenerated cellulose samples with different crystallinities. Polym. Bull.8: 163–170.Google Scholar
  8. Hortling B., Tamminen T., Tenkanen M., Teleman A. and Pekkala O.1995. Investigations of residual lignin and its interaction with polysaccharides in chemical pulps. International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, Tappi, Helsinki, Vol. 1, pp. 231–238.Google Scholar
  9. Hult E.-L., Larsson P.T. and Iversen T.2000. A comparative CP/MAS 13C-NMR study of cellulose structure in spruce wood and kraft pulp. Cellulose7: 35–55.Google Scholar
  10. Hult E.-L., Larsson P.T. and Iversen T.2001. Cellulose fibril aggregation–an inherent property of kraft pulps. Polymer42: 3309–3314.Google Scholar
  11. Kim Y.S. and Newman R.H.1995. Solid state 13C NMR study of wood degraded by the brown rot fungus Gloeophyllum trabeum. Holzforschung49: 109–114.Google Scholar
  12. Larsson P.T., Hult E.-L., Wickholm K., Petterson E. and Iversen T.1999. CP/MAS 13C-NMR spectroscopy applied to structure and interaction studies on cellulose I. Solid State NMR15: 31–40.Google Scholar
  13. Liitiä T., Maunu S.L. and Hortling B.2000a. Solid-state NMR studies of residual lignin and its association with carbohydrates. J. Pulp Pap. Sci.26: 323–330.Google Scholar
  14. Liitiä T., Maunu S.L. and Hortling B.2000b. Solid state NMR studies on cellulose crystallinity in fines and bulk fibres separated from refined kraft pulp. Holzforschung54: 618–624.Google Scholar
  15. Liitiä T., Maunu S.L. and Hortling B.2001. Solid state NMR studies on inhomogeneous structure of fibre wall in kraft pulp. Holzforschung55: 503–510.Google Scholar
  16. Liitiä T., Maunu S.L., Pekkala O., Varhimo A. and Hortling B.2002. Application of solid-state NMR spectroscopic methods to analyse cellulose crystallinity in pulps with varying hemicellulose contents. 7th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp, Turku, Finland, pp. 309–312.Google Scholar
  17. Löwendahl L. and Samuelson O.1977. Carbohydrate stabilization during kraft cooking with addition of anthraquinone. Svensk Papperstidning80: 549–551.Google Scholar
  18. Marchessault R.H., Settineri W. and Winter W.1967. Crystallization of xylan in the presence of cellulose. Tappi50: 55–59.Google Scholar
  19. Marchessault R.H., Taylor M.G. and Winter W.T.1990. 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of poly-β-D(1→4)mannose: mannan. Can. J. Chem.68: 1192–1195.Google Scholar
  20. Maunu S., Liitiä T., Kauliomäki S., Hortling B. and Sundquist J.2000. 13C CPMAS NMR investigations of cellulose polymorphs in different pulps. Cellulose7: 147–159.Google Scholar
  21. Mitikka-Eklund M.1996. Sorption of xylans on cellulose fibres. Licentiate Thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
  22. Newman R.H. and Hemmingson J.A.1990. Determination of the degree of cellulose crystallinity in wood by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Holzforschung44: 351–355.Google Scholar
  23. Newman R.H., Hemmingson J.A. and Suckling I.D.1993. Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of kraft pulping. Holzforschung47: 234–238.Google Scholar
  24. Newman R.H.1999. Estimation of the lateral dimensions of cellulose crystallites using 13C NMR signal strengths. Solid State NMR15: 21–29.Google Scholar
  25. Tamminen T., Hortling B. and Fuhrman A.1997. Analysis of residual lignin in ozone-treated pine and birch pulps. International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, Tappi, Montreal, A4–1–A4–4.Google Scholar
  26. Tamminen T. and Hortling B.1999. Isolation and Characterization of residual lignin. In: Argyropoulos D.S. (ed.), Advances in Lignocellulosics Characterization. Tappi Press, Atlanta, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
  27. Tamminen T., Hortling B., Laine C. and Liitiä T.2002. Interactions between the polymeric components of birch pulp fiber. 7th European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp, Turku, Finland, pp. 143–146.Google Scholar
  28. Teeäär R., Serimaa R. and Paakkari T.1987. Crystallinity of cellulose, as determined by CP/MAS NMR and XRD methods. Polym. Bull.17: 231–237.Google Scholar
  29. Teleman A., Larsson P.T. and Iversen T.2001. On the accessibility and structure of xylan in birch kraft pulp. Cellulose8: 209–215.Google Scholar
  30. VanderHart D.L. and Atalla R.H.1984. Studies of microstructure in native celluloses using solid state 13C NMR. Macromolecules17: 1465–1472.Google Scholar
  31. Wickholm K., Larsson P.T. and Iversen T.1998. Assignment of non-crystalline forms in cellulose I by CP/MAS 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res.312: 123–129.Google Scholar
  32. Westermark U. and Gustafsson K.1994. Molecular size distribution of wood polymers in birch kraft pulp. Holzforschung48: 146–150.Google Scholar
  33. Yamasaki T., Hosoya S., Chen C.-L., Gratzl J.S. and Chang H.-M.1981. Characterization of residual lignin in kraft pulp. International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, Vol. 2, Tappi, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 34–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiina Liitiä
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sirkka Liisa Maunu
    • 1
  • Bo Hortling
    • 2
  • Tarja Tamminen
    • 2
  • Osmo Pekkala
    • 2
  • Antero Varhimo
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Polymer ChemistryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.KCLScience and ConsultingEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations