Sex Roles

, Volume 43, Issue 5–6, pp 359–376 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Spatial Task Performance as a Function of Speed or Accuracy Orientation

  • Robyn M. Scali
  • Sheila Brownlow
  • Jennifer L. Hicks
Article

Abstract

Performance differences in spatial abilities as a function of gender may be modified by practice and relevant background experiences, as well as by directions given in laboratory situations. We examined whether a focus on speed or accuracy influenced performance in various spatial domains, using several different scoring techniques. Men and women from a small, predominantly White private college completed tasks of spatial perception, spatial visualization, and mental rotation under one of three conditions: speed-emphasis, accuracy-emphasis, or control. Participants also provided information concerning experiences pertinent to spatial ability. Results revealed relative parity between men and women on tasks of spatial visualization and spatial perception; speed/accuracy orientation did not alter these findings. Men outperformed women on mental rotation, but only when scored in a strict manner and when explicitly told to focus on accuracy, but not when directional emphasis was absent or geared toward speed. Self-reported background in math, sports, and the arts was unrelated to performance. The results are discussed in terms of women's efficacy beliefs about performing tasks explicitly designated as spatial in nature.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alington, D. E., Leaf, R. C., & Monaghan, J. R. (1992). Effects of stimulus color, pattern, and practice on sex differences in mental rotations task performance. Journal of Psychology, 126, 539–553.Google Scholar
  2. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344.Google Scholar
  3. Beatty, W.W., & Duncan, D. (1990). Relationship between performance on the Everyday Spatial ActivitiesTest and on the objective measure of spatial behavior inmenand women. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 228–230.Google Scholar
  4. Beyer, S. (1995). Maternal employment and children's academic achievement: Parenting styles as a mediating variable. Developmental Review, 15, 212–253.Google Scholar
  5. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157–172.Google Scholar
  6. Bryden, M. P., George, J., & Inch, R. (1990). Sex differences and the role of figural complexity in determining the rate of mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 467–477.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, J., Hall, J., & Huff, C. (1990). Situational stress as a consequence of sex-stereotyped software. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 419–429.Google Scholar
  8. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Fouad, N. A., & Smith, P. L. (1996).Atest of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 338–346.Google Scholar
  10. Goldstein, D., Haldane, D., & Mitchell, C. (1990). Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 18, 546–550.Google Scholar
  11. Halpern, D. F. (1986a). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Halpern, D. F. (1986b).Adifferent answer to the question, do sex-related differences in spatial ability exist? American Psychologist, 41, 1014–1015.Google Scholar
  13. Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091–1102.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and childrens' ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932–944.Google Scholar
  16. Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 182–186.Google Scholar
  17. Kass, S. J., Ahlers, R. H., & Dugger, M. (1998). Eliminating gender differences through practice on an applied visual spatial task. Human Performance, 11, 337–349.Google Scholar
  18. Kerns, K. A.,V & Berenbaum, S. A. (1991). Sex differences in spatial ability in children. Behavior Genetics, 21, 383–396.Google Scholar
  19. Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267, 119–125.Google Scholar
  20. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.Google Scholar
  21. Luehring, J., & Altman, J. D. (2000). Factors contributing to sex differences in the mental rotation task. Psi Chi Journal, 5, 39–35.Google Scholar
  22. Lunneborg, P. W. (1982). Sex differences in self-assessments of everyday spatial abilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 200–202.Google Scholar
  23. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents' differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.Google Scholar
  24. Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the mental rotations test is not due to performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 26, 444–448.Google Scholar
  25. McGee, M.G. (1979).Humanspatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–910.Google Scholar
  26. Newcombe, N., & Bandura, M. M. (1983). Effect of age at puberty on spatial ability in girls: A question of mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 19, 215–224.Google Scholar
  27. Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377–385.Google Scholar
  28. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know:Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.Google Scholar
  29. Oosthuizen, S. (1991). Sex-related differences in spatial ability in a group of South African students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 51–54.Google Scholar
  30. Petrusic, W. M., Varro, L., & Jamieson, D. G. (1978). Mental rotation validation of two spatial ability tests. Psychological Research, 40, 139–148.Google Scholar
  31. Räsänen, L. (1991). Girls and the learning of physical concepts. Finnish Journal of Education, 22, 185–194.Google Scholar
  32. Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: An effect of time limits? Brain and Cognition, 21, 71–79.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, J. T. E. (1994). Gender differences in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 435–448.Google Scholar
  34. Sanders, B., & Soares, M. P. (1986). Sexual maturation an spatial ability in college students. Developmental Psychology, 22, 199–203.Google Scholar
  35. Scali, R. M., & Brownlow, S. (in press). Impact of stereotype activation and experimental instructions on spatial performance. Psi Chi Journal.Google Scholar
  36. Sharps, M. J., Price, J. L., & Williams, J. K. (1994). Spatial cognition and gender: Instructional and stimulus influences on mental image rotation performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 413–425.Google Scholar
  37. Sharps, M. J., Welton, A. L., & Price, J. L. (1993). Gender and task in the determination of spatial cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 71–83.Google Scholar
  38. Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.Google Scholar
  39. Stericker, A., & LeVesconte, S. (1982). Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1018–1029.Google Scholar
  40. Stumpf, H., & Kleime, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 915–921.Google Scholar
  41. Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: Assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.Google Scholar
  42. Swim, J. K., & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–519.Google Scholar
  43. Tapley, S. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1977). Sex differences in mental rotation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31, 123–130.Google Scholar
  44. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.Google Scholar
  45. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities:A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.Google Scholar
  46. Walter, K., Roberts. A. E., & Brownlow, S. (2000). Spatial perception and mental rotation produce gender differences in cerebral hemovelocity: A TCD study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 37–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn M. Scali
    • 1
  • Sheila Brownlow
    • 2
  • Jennifer L. Hicks
    • 1
  1. 1.Catawba CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Catawba CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations