Journal of Medical Humanities

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 41–53 | Cite as

Defining the Subject of Consent in DNA Research

  • Gordon R. Mitchell
  • Kelly Happe


The advent of population-specific genomic research has prompted calls for invention of informed consent protocols that would treat entire social groups as research subjects as well as endow such groups with authority as agents of consent. Critics of such an unconventional ethical norm of “group consent” fear the rhetorical effects of approaching social groups with offers to participate in dialogues about informed consent. Addressing a specific population as the collective subject of genomic research, on this logic, adds currency to the potentially dangerous public opinion that such a group is bound by genetic ties. The paper considers the problem of group and individual identity within the rhetorical dynamics of the discourse and politics of consent.

Rhetoric informed consent genetics African Burial Ground Project 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. The big test. (2000 July 10 & 17). The New Republic, 9.Google Scholar
  2. Blakey, M. (1998a). The African burial ground: Continued research and preservation or “business as usual”? Newsletter of the African Burial Ground and Five Points Archaeological Projects Update (Fall), 1–11Google Scholar
  3. Blakey,M. (1998b, November). Update on the analysis of the ancestral remains at Howard University. Paper presented at the African Burial Ground Project 1998 Educators Symposium, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, E. L. (1993). Historic site offers new directions. Newsletter of the African Burial Ground and Five Points Archaeological Projects Update (Fall), 1–3.Google Scholar
  5. Clinton, W. J. (2000). Remarks by the President, Prime Minister Tony Blair of England, Dr. FrancisGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, and Dr. Craig Venter, President and Chief Scientific Officer, Celera Genomics Corporation, on the completion of the first survey of the entire Human Genome Project. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary (June 26). Online. Available at: <>.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, K. (1993, March 27). Skeletons haunt American race debate. The Weekly Journal, 56, 1.Google Scholar
  8. Devieux, M. A., & Mathis, R. A. (1996). Issues in the field: Notes on oral history, anthropology, and African American culture. Newsletter of the African Burial Ground andFivePoints Archaeological Projects Update (Fall), 9–15.Google Scholar
  9. Duster, T. (1990). Backdoor to eugenics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foster, M. W., Bersten, D., & Carter, T. (1998). A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63, 696–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, M.W., Eisenbraun, A.J., & Carter, T. (1997). Communal discourse as a supplement to informed consent for genetic research. Nature Genetics, 17, 277–279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Foster, M.W., & Sharp, R. R. (2000). Genetic research and culturally specific risks: One size does not fit all. Trends in Genetics, 16, 93–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, M.W., Sharp, R. R., Freeman, W.L., Chino, M., Bersten, M., & Carter, T.H. (1999). The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64, 1719–1727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldgar, D. E., & Reilly, P. R. (1995). A common BRCA1 mutation in the Ashkenazim. Nature Genetics, 11, 113–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen, J., & McGowan, G. (1998). Breaking ground, breaking silence: The story of New York's African burial ground. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  17. Holtzman, N. A., & Marteau, T.M(2000).Will genetics revolutionize medicine? New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 141–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hubbard, R., & Henifin, M. S. (1985). Genetic screening of prospective parents and of workers: Some scientific and social issues. International Journal of Health Services, 15, 231–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson, F. (1997a). Concerns and priorities in genetic studies: Insights from recent African American biohistory. Seton Hall Law Review, 27, 951–964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson, F. (1997b). Assessing the Human Genome Project: An African American and bioanthropological critique. In E. Smith & W. Sapp (Eds.), Plain talk about the Human Genome Project (pp. 95–104). Tuskegee, AL: Tuskegee University.Google Scholar
  21. Juengst, E. T. (1998). Group identity and human diversity: Keeping biology straight from culture. American Journal of Human Genetics, 63, 637–677.Google Scholar
  22. Katz, J. (1984). The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kaufmann, M. B. (1999). Genetic discrimination in theworkplace: An overviewof existing protections. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 30, 393–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leventhal, D. (1997). The Human Genome Project: The road to our improved health or the new civil rights movement. Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal, 15, 207–245.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, P. S. (1998). Genetic discrimination in the workplace. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 26, 189–194.Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell, G. R., & Happe, K. (forthcoming). Rhetorical dimensions of informed consent in genomic research. Rhetoric and Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  27. Murray, R., Jr. (1997). The ethics of predictive genetic screening: Are the benefits worth the risks? In E. Smith & W. Sapp (Eds.), Plain talk about the Human Genome Project (pp. 139–150.). Tuskegee, AL.: Tuskegee University.Google Scholar
  28. National Research Council. (1999). Human rights and human genetic variation research. In J. M. Mann, S. Gruskin, M. A. Grodin, & G. J. Annas (Eds.), Health and human rights: A reader (pp. 380–394). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Paterson, Hon. D. (1999, January). Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture address. Presented at the Friends of the African Burial Ground community hearing, Harlem, NY.Google Scholar
  30. Patrinos, A. (1997). The human genome project: What is it? In E. Smith & W. Sapp (Eds.), Plain talk about the Human Genome Project (pp. 1–10). Tuskegee, AL: Tuskegee University.Google Scholar
  31. Pearson, M. P. (1999). The archaeology of death and burial. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rachinsky, T. L. (2000). Genetic testing: Toward a comprehensive policy to prevent genetic discrimination in the workplace. Journal of Labor and Employment Law, 2, 575–598.Google Scholar
  33. Richter, J. (1997). Taking the worker as you find him: The quandary of protecting the rights as well as the health of the worker with a genetic susceptibility to occupational disease. Maryland Journal of Contemporary Issues, 8, 189–236.Google Scholar
  34. Rothstein, M. A. (1997). Genetic secrets: A policy framework. In M.A. Rothstein (Ed.), Genetic secrets: Protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era (pp. 451–495). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scientists probe African Burial Ground for answers to puzzles (1993, August 21). New York Amsterdam News, 84, 2.Google Scholar
  36. Struewing, J. P., Abeliovich, D., Peretz, T., Avishai, N., Kaback, M. M., Collins, F. S., & Brody, L. C. (1995). The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Nature Genetics, 11, 198–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Struewing, J. P., Hartge, P., Wacholder, S., Baker, S. M., Berlin, M., McAdams, M., Timmerman, M. M., Brody, L. C., & Tucker, M. A. (1997). The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Askenazi Jews. New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 1401–1408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Turk, T. (1993, May 22). Dispute stops progress on African burial study. Michigan Citizen, 15, p. A1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon R. Mitchell
    • 1
  • Kelly Happe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations