Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 37, Issue 11, pp 2669–2733 | Cite as

Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem: I. Quantum States as Generalized Valuations

  • C. J. Isham
  • J. Butterfield
Article

Abstract

Any attempt to construct a realistinterpretation of quantum theory founders on theKochen–Specker theorem, which asserts theimpossibility of assigning values to quantum quantitiesin a way that preserves functional relations between them. We constructa new type of valuation which is defined on alloperators, and which respects an appropriate version ofthe functional composition principle. The truth-values assigned to propositions are (i) contextual and(ii) multivalued, where the space of contexts and themultivalued logic for each context come naturally fromthe topos theory of presheaves. The first step in our theory is to demonstrate that theKochen–Specker theorem is equivalent to thestatement that a certain presheaf defined on thecategory of self-adjoint operators has no globalelements. We then show how the use of ideas drawn from the theory ofpresheaves leads to the definition of a generalizedvaluation in quantum theory whose values are sieves ofoperators. In particular, we show how each quantum state leads to such a generalized valuation. Akey ingredient throughout is the idea that, in asituation where no normal truth-value can be given to aproposition asserting that the value of a physical quantity A lies in a subset \(\Delta \subseteq \mathbb{R}\), it is nevertheless possible toascribe a partial truth-value which is determined by theset of all coarse-grained propositions that assert thatsome function f(A) lies in f(Δ), and that are true in a normalsense. The set of all such coarse-grainings forms asieve on the category of self-adjoint operators, and ishence fundamentally related to the theory ofpresheaves.

Keywords

Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Quantum State Quantum Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bacciagaluppi, G., and Hemmo, M. (1996). Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27B, 239-278.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, J. S. (1987). On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1-13.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, H. R. (1992). Bell's other theorem and its connection with non-locality. Part 1, in Bell's Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics, A. van der Merwe, F. Selleri, and G. Tarozzi, eds., World Scientific, Singapore.Google Scholar
  4. Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bub, J., and Clifton, C. (1996). A uniqueness theorem for “no collapse” interpretations of quantum mechanics, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27B, 181-219.Google Scholar
  6. Busch, P., Grabowski, M., and Lahti, P. J. (1995). Operational Quantum Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Butterfield, J., and Isham, C. J. (1998). A topos perspective on the Kochen–Specker theorem: II. Conceptual aspects and Classical Analogues, quant-ph/9808067, forthcoming in the International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 38.Google Scholar
  8. Clifton, R. (1995). Independently motivating the Kochen-Dieks modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 33-57.Google Scholar
  9. Dieks, D. (1995). Physical motivation of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, Physics Letters A, 197, 367-371.Google Scholar
  10. Dummett, M. (1978). Is logic empirical? In Truth and Other Enigmas, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  11. Dunford, N., and Schwartz, J. T. (1964). Linear Operators Part II: Spectral Theory, Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Goldblatt, R. (1984). Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Healey, R. (1989). The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Isham, C. J. (1997). Topos theory and consistent histories: The internal logic of the set of all consistent sets, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 36, 785-814.Google Scholar
  15. Kochen, S. (1985). A new interpretation of quantum mechanics, in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 151-170.Google Scholar
  16. Kochen, S., and Specker, E. P. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17, 59-87.Google Scholar
  17. MacLane, S., and Moerdijk, I. (1992). Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. Putnam, H. (1975). The logic of quantum mechanics, in Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 174-197.Google Scholar
  19. Singer, I. (1978). Some remarks on the Gribov ambiguity, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 60, 7-12.Google Scholar
  20. van Fraassen, B. C. (1981). A modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, in Current Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti and B. C. van Fraassen, eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 229-258.Google Scholar
  21. van Fraassen, B. C. (1991). Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Vermaas, P. E., and Dieks, D. (1995). The modal interpretation of quantum theory, Foundations of Physics, 25, 145-158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. J. Isham
  • J. Butterfield

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations