Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 462–464 | Cite as

Osmotic Effect of Honey on Growth and Viability of Helicobacterpylori

  • Michael S. Osato
  • Siddharta G. Reddy
  • David Y. Graham


Honey from New Zealand and Saudi Arabia atconcentrations approximating 20% (v/v) inhibit thegrowth of H. pylori in vitro. The anti-H. pylori effectinvolves both hydrogen peroxide- andnon-peroxide-mediated killing mechanisms. This study was designed todetermine wheThe r the anti-H. pylori activity of honeydiffered regionally (honey from Texas, Iowa, and NewZealand) and to determine wheThe r this activity was due to the presence of hydrogen peroxide.Broth dilution susceptibility tests were performed usingsolutions of honey prepared in BHI broth ranging inconcentration from 5 to 35% (v/v) in 5% increments. Control solutions containing glucose, fructose,and combined glucose/fructose solutions in ratios of1:1.23 were also prepared. Paired catalase controls wereincluded in all tests. Twenty-eight clinical isolates of H. pylori were tested. Growth wasdetermined on the basis of a plus/minus grading score.All of the solutions containing eiThe r fructose,glucose, glucose and fructose combinations, or honey were equally effective in inhibiting the growthof H. pylori. All of the isolates were inhibited bysolutions containing 15% (w/v) carbohydrate. Honeysolutions, with or without catalase, inhibited 24/28 isolates at a concentration of 10%, and 28/28isolates at a concentration of 15%. In conclusion,regional differences in honey activity against H. pyloriwere not detected, nor was the effect of killing related to the presence of hydrogen peroxide inthe honey samples. Osmotic effects weReshown to be themost important parameter for killing H. pylori as allcarbohydrate solutions ≥15% (v/v) inhibited 100% of the H. pylori.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sanford MT: Florida Extension Be ekeeping Newsletter, Apis— Agricultural Information and Issues (ISSN 0889-3764), Volume 11, Number 11, Novembe r 1993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ali AT, Chowdhury MN, al Humayyd MS: Inhibitory effect of natural honey on Helicoba cter pylori. Trop Gastroenterol 12:139-143, 1991Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    al Somal N, Coley KE, Molan PC, Hancock BM: Susceptibility of Helicobacterpylori to the antibacterial activity of manuka honey. J R Soc Med 87:9-12, 1994Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willix DJ, Molan PC, Harfoot CTG: A comparison of the sensitivity of wound-infecting species of bacteria to the antibacterial activity of manuka honey and oTher honey. J Appl Bacteriol 73:388-394, 1992Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeddar A, Kharsany A, Ramsaroop UG, Bhamjee A, Haffe jee IE, Moosa A: The antibacterial action of honey. An in vitro study. South Afr Med J 67:257-258, 1985Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allen KL, Molan PC, Reid GM: A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys. J Pharm Pharmacol 43:817-822, 1991Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elbagoury EF, Rasmy S: Antibacterial action of natural honey on anaerobic bacteroides. Egypt Dent J 39:381-386, 1993Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steinberg D, Kaine G, Gedalia I: Antibacterial effect of propolis and honey on oral bacteria. Am J Dent 9:236-239, 1996Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Obi CL, Ugoji EO, Edun SA, Lawal SF, Anyiwo CE: The antibacterial effect of honey on diarrhoea causing bacterial agents isolated in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 23:257-260, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Osato
  • Siddharta G. Reddy
  • David Y. Graham

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations