A Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem II. Conceptual Aspects and Classical Analogues
- 105 Downloads
- 57 Citations
Abstract
In a previous paper, we proposed assigning asthe value of a physical quantity in quantum theory acertain kind of set (a sieve) of quantities that arefunctions of the given quantity. The motivation was in part physical — such a valuationilluminates the Kochen–Specker theorem — andin part mathematical — the valuation arisesnaturally in the topos theory of presheaves. This paperdiscusses the conceptual aspects of this proposal. We also undertake two othertasks. First, we explain how the proposed valuationscould arise much more generally than just in quantumphysics; in particular, they arise as naturally in classical physics. Second, we give anothermotivation for such valuations (that applies equally toclassical and quantum physics). This arises fromapplying to propositions about the values of physical quantities some general axioms governingpartial truth for any kind of proposition.
Keywords
Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Quantum Theory TopoPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
- 1.C. J. Isham and J. Butterfield, A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: I. Quantum states as generalised valuations, Int. J. Theor. Phys. (1998), to appear [quantph/ 980355].Google Scholar
- 2.J. Butterfield and C. J. Isham, Philosophical implications of generalised valuations. (1998), in preparation.Google Scholar
- 3.J. Butterfield and C. J. Isham, A topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: III. Interval-valued generalised valuations (1998), in preparation.Google Scholar
- 4.R. Goldblatt, Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic, North-Holland, London (1984).Google Scholar
- 5.S. MacLane and I. Moerdijk, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory, Springer-Verlag, London (1992).Google Scholar
- 6.S. Haack, Is truth flat or bumpy? in Prospects for Pragmatism, D. H. Mellor, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar