Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 371–378 | Cite as

Aggregated Estimation of the Basic Parameters of Biological Production and the Carbon Budget of Russian Terrestrial Ecosystems: 1. Stocks of Plant Organic Mass

  • A. Z. Shvidenko
  • S. Nilsson
  • V. S. Stolbovoi
  • M. Gluck
  • D. G. Shchepashchenko
  • V. A. Rozhkov
Article

Abstract

The data presented were obtained at the first stage (1993–1999) of studies on evaluating the basic parameters of biological production in Russian terrestrial ecosystems in order to provide information for assessing and modeling the carbon budget of the entire terrestrial biota of the country. Stocks of phytomass (by fractions), coarse woody debris, and dead roots (underground necromass) were calculated by two independent methods, which yielded close results. The total amount of phytomass in Russian terrestrial ecosystems was estimated at 81 800 Tg (=1012 g = million t) dry matter, or 39 989 Tg carbon. Forest ecosystems comprise a greater part (82.1%) of live plant organic matter (here and below, comparisons are made with respect to the carbon content); natural grasslands and brushwoods account for 8.8%; the phytomass of wetlands (bogs and swamps), for 6.6%; and the phytomass of farmlands, for only 2.5%. Aboveground wood contains approximately two-thirds of the plant carbon (63.8%), and green parts contain 9.9%. For all classes of ecosystems, the proportion of underground phytomass averages 26.7% of the total amount, varying from 22.0% in forests to 57.1% in grasslands and brushwoods. The average phytomass density on lands covered with vegetation (1629.9 million hectares in Russia) is 5.02 kg/m2 dry matter, or 2.45 kg C/m2. The total amount of carbon in coarse woody debris is 4955 Tg C, and 9180 Tg C are in the underground necromass. In total, the vegetation of Russian terrestrial ecosystems (without litter) contains 54 124 Tg carbon.

biological production phytomass stock and density forest ecosystems bogs grasslands and brushwoods farmlands carbon stock 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bazilevich, N.I., Biologicheskaya produktivnost'ekosistem Severnoi Evrazii (Biological Productivity of Ecosystems in Northern Eurasia), Moscow: Nauka, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Bonnor, G.M., Forest Biomass Inventory, in Biomass: Regerenable Energy, Hall, D.O. and Overend, R.P., Eds., Wiley, 1987, pp. 47–73Google Scholar
  3. Botkin, D.V. and Simpson, L.G., Biomass of the North American Boreal Forest, Biogeochemistry, 1990, vol. 9, pp. 161–174.Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, R.K., Brown, S., Houghton, R.A., Solomon, A.M., Trexler, M.C., and Wisniewski, J., Carbon Pools and Fluxes of Global Forest Ecosystems, Science, 1994, vol. 263, pp. 185–190.Google Scholar
  5. FAO, A Framework for Land Evaluation, Soil Bull., 1976, no. 32, p. 79.Google Scholar
  6. Goldewijk, K.K., van Minnen, J.G., Kreileman, G.J.J., Bloedbeld, M., and Leemans, R., Simulating the Carbon Flux between the Terrestrial Environment and the Atmosphere, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 1994, vol. 76, pp. 99–230.Google Scholar
  7. Isaev, A.S., Korovin, G.N., Utkin, A.I., Pryashnikov, A.A., and Zamolodchikov, D.G., Carbon Stock and Deposition in Phytomass of the Russian Forests, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 1995, vol. 70, pp. 247–256.Google Scholar
  8. Jackson, R.B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J.B., et al., A Global Analysis of Root Distribution for Terrestrial Biomes, Oekologia, 1996, vol. 108, pp. 389–411.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, R.B., Mooney, H.A., and Schulze, E.-D., A Global Budget for Fine Root Biomass, Surface Area, and Nutrient Contents, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1997, vol. 94, pp. 7362–7366.Google Scholar
  10. Karelin, D.V., Zamolodchikov, D.G., and Gil'manov, T.G., Carbon Stocks and Production in the Phytomass of Russian Tundra and Forest-Tundra Ecosystems, Lesovedenie, 1995, no. 8, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
  11. Kolchugina, T.P. and Vinson, T.S., Carbon Sources and Sinks in Forest Biomes of the Former Soviet Union, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 1993, no. 7(2), pp. 291–304.Google Scholar
  12. Krylatov, A.K., Nosov, S.I., Yuditskii, B.A., et al., Dinamika balansa gumusa na pakhotnykh zemlyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Dynamics of Humus Balance in Arable Lands of the Russian Federation), Moscow: Goskomzem Rossii, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Kurnaev, S.F., Lesorastitel'noe raionirovanie SSSR (Forest Site Zoning of the Soviet Union), Moscow: Nauka, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Matthews, G., The Carbon Content of Trees, Forestry Committee Technical Paper 4, Edinburgh, 1993, p. 21.Google Scholar
  15. McGuire, A.D., Kicklighter, D.W., and Melillo, J.M., Global Climate Change and Carbon Cycling in Grasslands and Coniferous Forests, Global Change: Effects on Coniferous Forests and Grasslands, SCOPE 56, Breymeyer, A.I., Hall, D.O., Melillo, J.M., and Agren, G.I., Eds., Wiley, 1996, pp. 389–411.Google Scholar
  16. Nilsson, S., Shvidenko, A., Stolbovoi, V., et al., Full Terrestrial Carbon Budget: Case Study for Russia, IR, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2000, p. 140.Google Scholar
  17. Shvidenko, A., Nilsson, S., Shepashenko, D., and Lakida, P., Models for Aggregated Estimations of Forest Ecosystems Phytomass of Northern Eurasia, IR, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, 2000, p. 32.Google Scholar
  18. Stolbovoi, V., Fischer, G., Sizov, V., and Rozhkova (Kravets), B., Georeferenced Database of the Former USSR, vol. 5: Land Categories. IR-97-087, Laxenburg, Austria : IIASA, 1997, p. 15.Google Scholar
  19. Uglerod v ekosistemakh lesov i bolot Rossii (Carbon Storage in Forests and Peatlands of Russia), Alexeyev, V.A. and Birdsey, R.A., Eds., Krasnoyarsk: Inst. Lesa im. Sukacheva, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Utkin, A.I., Biological Productivity of Forests (Research Methods and Results), Itogi Nauki Tekh. Ser.: Lesoved., Lesovod., Moscow: VINITI, 1975, vol. 1, pp. 9–189.Google Scholar
  21. Vedrova, E.F., Carbon Pools and Fluxes of 25-Year Old Coniferous and Deciduous Stands in Middle Siberia, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 1995, vol. 82, nos. 1, 2, pp. 239–246.Google Scholar
  22. WGBU, Die Anrechnung biologisher Quellen und Senken im Kyoto-Protokoll: Fortschritt oder Rückschlag für dem globalen Umweltschutz, Bremerhaven (Germany), 1998, p. 76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Z. Shvidenko
    • 1
  • S. Nilsson
    • 1
  • V. S. Stolbovoi
    • 1
  • M. Gluck
    • 1
  • D. G. Shchepashchenko
    • 2
  • V. A. Rozhkov
    • 3
  1. 1.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria
  2. 2.Moscow State Forest University, MytishchiMoscow oblastRussia
  3. 3.Dokuchaev Soil Science InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations