The Nature of Heterosis and Methods of Enhancing and Fixing It in a Series of Generations without Hybridization

  • V. A. Strunnikov
  • L. V. Strunnikova


The long-standing studies into the problem of heterosis on the silkworm and other objects are reviewed. Silkworms are divided by sex for hybridization using the genetic marking of the eggs by sex, an improved method of ameiotic parthenogenesis providing all-female progeny, or the method of obtaining all-male progeny as a result of the death of eggs with female embryos under the influence of two non-allele embryonic lethals balances in the Z-chromosome. The experimental data suggest that heterosis is determined by the heterozygosity of lethals and semilethals, rather than depending on the heterozygosity of all gene types. The number of modifier genes that control viability plays a big role in the vigor of heterosis. An effective method is proposed to enhance the vigor of heterosis through the selection of one or two parents of a hybrid for viability, both of which received a strong semilethal. In hybrids, this semilethal is suppressed by the normal allele, and then a more unbalanced complex of modifier genes initiates a heterosis two to three times more vigorous than in standard hybrids. A method is developed to fix heterosis through the backcrosses of females of the high-heterosis hybrids to the absolutely homozygous males of androgenetic origin obtained from these females. These crosses preserve the main genotype of the hybrid and eliminate lethals and semilethals, and, as a result, heterosis is not damped during standard intrahybrid reproduction.


Experimental Data Gene Type Modifier Gene Improve Method Embryonic Lethal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astaurov, B.L., Tsitogenetika razvitiya tutovogo shelkopryada I ee eksperimental'nyi kontrol' (Developmental Cytogenetics of the Silkworm and Its Experimental Control), Moscow: Nauka, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Astaurov, B.L., Selection for Capacity to Thermal Parthenogenesis and Production of Improved Silkworm Parthenoclones, Genetika, 1973, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
  3. Gostimskii, S.A., Ezhova, G.A., and Rybtsov, S.A., Possible Production of Heterotic Forms Based on Semilethal Chlorophyll Mutations in the Pea, Biol., 1992, no. 1, pp. 64–72.Google Scholar
  4. Hatt, F., Genetika zhivotnykh (Animal Genetics), Moscow: Kolos, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. Kaidanov, L.Z. and Subbotin, A.M., A Study of Combinative Ability in Drosophila melanogaster Inbred Lines, Tsitol. Genet., 1984, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 429–432.Google Scholar
  6. Kaidanov, L.Z., Genova, G.K., and Gorbunova, V.N., Identification of Mutations Accumulated in Chromosomes 2 and Affecting Viability of Line LA, Issled. Genet., 1979, no. 8, pp. 54–62.Google Scholar
  7. Marec, F., Genetic Control of Pest Lepidoptera: Induction of SexLinked Recessive Lethal Mutation in Ephestia kuhniella (Pyralidae), Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov., 1990, vol. 87, pp. 445–458.Google Scholar
  8. Navolotskii, V.D., Selection of Spring Barley for the Conditions of Insufficient Water Content, Cand. Sci. (Bio.) Dissertation, Leningrad, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Serebrovskii, A.S., Teoreticheskie osnovaniya translokatsionnogo metoda bor'by s vrednymi nasekomymi (Theoretical Foundations of the Translocation Method of Insect Pest Control), Moscow: Nauka, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Strunnikov, V.A., Production of Male Progeny in the Silkworm, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1969, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 1155–1158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Strunnikov, V.A., A Method of Production of Parthenogenetic Clones in the Silkworm, Byull. Izobr., 1977, no. 43.Google Scholar
  12. Strunnikov, V.A., Prospective Use of Balanced SexLinked Lethals for the Insect Pest Control, Genetika, 1978, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2002–2005.Google Scholar
  13. Strunnikov, V.A., A New Hypothesis of Heterosis: Its Scientific and Practical Significance, Vestn. Nauki, 1983, no. 1, pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
  14. Strunnikov, V.A., Priroda geterozisa I novye metody ego povysheniya (Nature of Heterosis and New Methods of Its Enhancement), Moscow: Nauka, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. Strunnikov, V.A., Control over Reproduction, Sex, and Heterosis of the Silkworm, New York: Harwood Academic, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. Strunnikov, V.A., Cloning of Animals: Theory and Practice, Priroda, 1998, no. 7, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
  17. Strunnikov, V.A. and Gulyamova, L.M., Artificial Sex Regulation in the Silkworm. 1. Production of SexLinked Breeds, Genetika, 1969, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 52–69.Google Scholar
  18. Strunnikov, V.A. and Maresin, V.M., Specific Features of Activation of the Silkworm Eggs, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1980, vol. 251, no. 3, pp. 720–724.Google Scholar
  19. Strunnikov, V.A., Gubanov, E.A., and Pronyaeva, M.V., Imprinting in the Silkworm, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1991, vol. 317, no. 4, pp. 996–1000.Google Scholar
  20. Taglina, O.V., Studies of Structural Functional Features of Polytene Chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster with Reference to the Effect of Heterosis and Differences in Adaptively Significant Traits, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Khar'kov, 1991.Google Scholar
  21. Tazima, Y., A Simple Method of Sex Discrimination by Means of Larval Markings in B. mori, J. Seric. Sci. Jpn., 1941, vol. 12, pp. 184–188.Google Scholar
  22. Terskaya, E.R. and Strunnikov, V.A., Artificial Meiotic Parthenogenesis in the Silkworm, Genetika, 1975, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 54–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Strunnikov
    • 1
  • L. V. Strunnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Kol'tsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations