Plant and Soil

, Volume 225, Issue 1–2, pp 63–72 | Cite as

Nitrogen use in mixed tree crop plantations with a legume cover crop

  • Johannes Lehmann
  • Jose Pereira da SilvaJr.
  • Götz Schroth
  • Gerhard Gebauer
  • Luciana Ferreira da Silva
Article

Abstract

In a multi-strata agroforestry system in central Amazonia, we studied the nitrogen (N) use of two indigenous fruit tree species, Theobroma grandiflorum Willd. (ex Spreng.) K. Schum. (cupuaçu) and Bactris gasipaes Kunth. (peachpalm) for heart of palm production, and a legume cover crop, Pueraria phaseoloides Roxb. (Benth.) (pueraria). 15N was applied at a rate of 1 kg ha−1 twice at the beginning and at the peak of the rainy season, in a split plot design under either cupuaçu, peachpalm or pueraria together with fertilizer N usually applied (95.4 and 42.4 g N tree−1 for cupuaçu and peachpalm, respectively). Plant and soil 15N content and total 15N uptake were measured for 1 year. The highest N uptake by the trees occurred from areas underneath their canopy being more than 70% of their total N uptake. During the dry season, pueraria also took up most of its N (more than 70%) from the area underneath its own canopy. During the rainy season, however, pueraria utilized N from the area under cupuaçu (27–40%) and peachpalm (34–47% of the total N uptake by pueraria). Cupuaçu took up between 12 and 26% of its N from the area covered by pueraria, peachpalm slightly less with 10 to 18% (significant only at the end of the rainy season; P<0.05). Competition for N uptake between the trees was negligible. The above-ground recovery was highest in cupuaçu (15% of the applied 15N), followed by pueraria (11%) and peachpalm (3%). Pueraria proved to be very important for the N cycling in the mixed tree cropping system recovering most (31%) of the applied 15N in plant and soil in comparison to cupuaçu (20%) and peachpalm (21%). However, the natural 15N abundance of the tree leaves did not show a significant transfer of biologically fixed N2 from pueraria to the trees (P>0.05) and the cover crop did not improve tree N nutrition. The investigated fruit trees did not benefit from biologically fixed N2 of the legume cover crop due to their low lateral root activity and the high available soil N contents largely being an effect of the amount and placement of mineral fertilizer.

agroforestry Amazonia Bactris gasipaes humid tropics Pueraria phaseoloides root activity Theobroma grandiflorum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahenkorah Y 1975 Use of radio-active phosphorus in determining the efficiency of fertilizer utilization by cacao plantation. Plant Soil 42, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahenkorah Y, Halm B J, Appiah M R, Akrofi G S and Yirenkyi J E K 1987 Twenty years’ results from a shade and fertilizer trial on Amazon cocoa (Theobroma cacao) in Ghana. Expl. Agric. 23, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfaia S S 1997 Destino de adubos nitrogenados marcados com 15N em amostras de dois solos da Amazô nia central. R. Bras. Ci. Solo 21, 379–385.Google Scholar
  4. Chalk P M and Smith C J 1994 15N isotope dilution methodology for evaluating the dynamics of biologically fixed N in legume-non-legume associations. Biol. Fert. Soils. 17, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cravo M S and Smyth T J 1997 Manejo sustentado da fertilidade de um latossolo da amazô nia central sob cultivos successivos. R. Bras. Ci. Solo 21, 607–616.Google Scholar
  6. FAO 1990 Soil map of the world, revised legend. FAO, Rome, Italy. 119 p.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandes D N and Sanford R L Jr 1995 Effects of recent landuse practices on soil nutrients and successions under tropical wet forest in Costa Rica. Cons. Biol. 9, 915–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haag D 1997 Root distribution patterns in a polyculture system with local tree crops on an acid upland soil in central Amazonia. MSc thesis, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany. 88 p.Google Scholar
  9. Huxley P A, Patel R Z, Kabaara AM and Mitchell HW1974 Tracer studies with 32P on the distribution of functional roots of Arabica coffee in Kenya. Ann. Appl. Biol. 77, 159–180.Google Scholar
  10. IAEA 1975 Root activity patterns of some tree crops. Technical Report Series No 170, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. 151 p.Google Scholar
  11. Lehmann J, Peter I, Steglich C, Gebauer G, Huwe B and Zech W 1998 Below-ground interactions in dryland agroforestry. For. Ecol. Manage. 111, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehmann J, da Silva Jr JP, Trujillo L and Uguen K 2000 Legume cover crops and nutrient cycling in tropical fruit tree production. Acta Horticulturae, 531, 65–72.Google Scholar
  13. Little T M and Hills F J 1978 Agricultural Experimentation. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 350 p.Google Scholar
  14. Peter I and Lehmann J 2000 Pruning effects on root distribution and nutrient dynamics in an acacia hedgerow planting. Agrofor. Syst., 50, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rao M R, Nair P K R and Ong C K 1997 Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 38, 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Wambeke A 1992 Soils of the Tropics. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA. 343 p.Google Scholar
  17. Wahid P A, Kamalam N V and Antilkumar K S 1993 Coconut. In Rooting Patterns of Tropical Crops. Eds. M A Salam and P A Wahid. pp 188–203. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  18. Wolf M A 1997 Accumulation of biomass and nutrients in the aboveground organs of four local tree species in mono-culture and polyculture systems in central Amazonia. MSc Thesis, University of Braunschweig, Germany. 310 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Lehmann
    • 1
  • Jose Pereira da SilvaJr.
    • 2
  • Götz Schroth
    • 3
  • Gerhard Gebauer
    • 4
  • Luciana Ferreira da Silva
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Soil Science and Soil GeographyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Embrapa Amazônia OcidentalManausBrazil
  3. 3.Institute of Applied BotanyUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Plant EcologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations