Plant and Soil

, Volume 227, Issue 1–2, pp 265–272 | Cite as

The role of Eriophorum vaginatum in CH4 flux from an ombrotrophic peatland

  • A. L. Greenup
  • M. A. Bradford
  • N. P. McNamara
  • P. Ineson
  • J. A. Lee
Article

Abstract

Vegetation composition was found to be an important factor controlling CH4 emission from an ombrotrophic peatland in the UK, with significantly greater (P < 0.01) CH4 released from areas containing both Eriophorum vaginatumL. and Sphagnum, than from similar areas without E. vaginatum. Positive correlations were observed between the amount of E. vaginatum and CH4 emission, with the best predictor of flux being the amount of below-ground biomass of this species (r 2 = 0.93). A cutting experiment revealed that there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in CH4 flux between plots with E. vaginatum stems cut above the water table and plots with intact vegetation, yet there was a 56% mean reduction in CH4 efflux where stems were cut below the water table (P < 0.05). The effect of E. vaginatum on CH4 release was mimicked by the presence of inert glass tubes. These findings suggest that the main short-term role of E. vaginatum in the ecosystem is simply as a conduit for CH4 release. The longer-term importance of E. vaginatum in controlling CH4 fluxes through C substrate input was suggested by the positive correlation between the night-time CO2 and CH4 fluxes (r 2 = 0.70), which only occurred when the vegetation was not senescent.

Aerenchyma Eriophorum vaginatum L. methane peatland Sphagnum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arenovski A L and Howes B L 1992 Lacunal allocation and gas transport capacity in the salt marsh grass Spartina alterniflora. Oecologia 90, 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett, K B, Crill P M, Sass R L, Harriss R C and Dise N B 1992 Methane emissions from tundra environments in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 97, 16,645–16,660.Google Scholar
  3. Bellisario L M, Bubier J L and Moore T R 1999 Controls on methane emissions from a northern peatland. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell R C 1989 Statistics for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Chanton J P and Dacey J W H 1991 Effects of vegetation on methane flux, reservoirs and carbon isotope composition. In Trace Gas Emissions from plants. Eds. T Sharkey, E Holland and H Mooney. pp 65–92. Academic Press Inc, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Chanton J P, Whiting G J, Showers W J and Crill P M 1992 Methane flux from Peltandra virginica: Stable isotope tracing and chamber effects. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 6, 15–31.Google Scholar
  7. Cicerone R J and Oremland R S 1988 Biogeochemical aspects of atmopsheric methane. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2, 299–327.Google Scholar
  8. Clymo R S 1987 The ecology of peatlands. Science Progress Oxford 71, 593–614.Google Scholar
  9. Conrad R 1993 Mechanisms controlling methane emissions from wetland rice fields. In Biogeochemistry of Global Change: Radiatively Active Trace Gases. Ed. RS Oremland. pp 317–335. Selectedpapers, tenth international symposium on environmental biogeochemistry, San Francisco, August 1991. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Dacey J W H 1981 Pressurized ventilation in the yellow water lily. Ecology 62, 1137–1147. 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daulat W E and Clymo R S 1998 Effects of temperature and water table on the efflux of methane from peatland surface cores. Atmos. Environ. 32, 3207–3218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dise N B, Gorham E and Verry E S 1993 Environmental-factors controlling methane emissions from peatlands in northern Minnesota. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 98, 10,583–10,594.Google Scholar
  13. Frenzel P and Rudolph J 1998 Methane emission from a wetland plant: The role of methane oxidation in Eriophorum. Plant Soil 202, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holder R L 1985 Multiple Regression in Hydrology. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R and Seiler W1986 Effects of vegetation on the emission of methane from submerged paddy soils. Plant Soil 92, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ineson P, Coward P A and Hartwig U A 1998 Soil gas fluxes of nitrous oxide, methane and carbon dioxide beneath Lolium perenne under elevated carbon dioxide: The Swiss free air carbon dioxide enrichment experiment. Plant Soil 198, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarvis R A, Bendelow V C, Bradley R I, Carroll D M, Furness R R, Kilgour I N L and King S J 1984 Soils and their use in Northern England. Soil Survey of England and Wales Bulletin No 10, Harpenden, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Kelker D and Chanton J 1997 The effect of clipping on methane emissions from Carex. Biogeochemistry 39, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lloyd D, Thomas K L, Benstead J, Davies K L, Lloyd S H, Arah J R M and Stephen K D 1998 Methanogenesis and carbon dioxide exchange in an ombrotrophic peat bog. Atmos. Environ. 32, 3229–3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews E and Fung I 1987 Methane emission from natural wetlands: global distribution, area and environmental characteristics of sources. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrissey L A, Zobel D B and Livingston G P 1993 Significance of stomatal control on methane release from Carex-dominated wetlands. Chemosphere 26, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nedwell D B and Watson A 1995 Methane production, oxidation and emission in a UK ombrotrophic peat bog: influence of sulphate from acid rain. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nouchi I, Mariko S and Aoki K 1990 Mechanisms of methane transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physiol. 94, 59–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rodwell J S 1991 British Plant Communities II: Mires and Heaths. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Roslev P and King G M 1994 Survival and recovery of methanotrophic bacteria starved under oxic and anoxic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 2602–2608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Roura-Carol M and Freeman C 1999 Methane release from peat soils: effects of Sphagnum and Juncus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saarnio S, Alm J, Martikainen P J and Silvola J 1998 Effects of raised carbon dioxide on potential methane production and oxidation in, and methane emission from a boreal mire. Journal of Ecology 86, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saarnio S and Silvola J 1999 Effects of increased carbon dioxide and nitrogen on methane efflux from a boreal mire: a growth chamber experiment. Oecologia 119, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SAS Institute 1988 SAS/STATTM user's guide release 603 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Schimel J P 1995 Plant transport and methane production as controls on methane flux from arctic wet meadow tundra. Biogeochemistry 28, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schütz H, Seiler W and Rennenberg H 1990 Soil and land use related sources and sinks of methane in the context of the global methane budget. In Soils and the Greenhouse Effect. Ed. AF Bouwman. pp 269–285. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  32. Sculthorpe C D 1985 The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Koeltz Scientific Books, Konigstein, Germany.Google Scholar
  33. Sebacher D I, Harriss R C and Bartlett K B 1985 Methane emissions to the atmosphere through aquatic plants. J. Environ. Qual. 14, 40–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Segers R and Leffelaar P A 1996 On explaining methane fluxes from weather, soil and vegetation data via the underlying processes. In Northern Peatlands in Global Climatic Change. Eds. R Laiho J Laine and H Vasander. pp 282–287. Proceedings of the international workshop held in Hyytiälä Finland. Publications of the Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  35. Shannon R D, White J R, Lawson J E and Gilmour B S 1996 Methane efflux from emergent vegetation in peatlands. J. Ecol. 84, 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas K L, Benstead J, Davies K L and Lloyd D 1996 Role of wetland plants in the diurnal control of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes in peat. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Topp E and Pattey E 1997 Soils as sources and sinks for atmospheric methane. Can. J. Soil Sci. 77, 167–178.Google Scholar
  38. Torn M S and Chapin F S 1993 Environmental and biotic controls over methane flux from arctic tundra. Chemosphere 26, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Veen J A, Merckx R and Van de Geijn S C 1989 Plant-and soil-related controls of the flow of carbon from roots through the soil microbial biomass. Plant Soil 115, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vecherskaya M S, Gachenko V F, Sokolova E N and Samarkin V A 1993 Activity and species composition of aerobic methanotrophic communities in tundra soils. Current Microbiol. 27, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waddington J M and Roulet N T 1997 Groundwater flow and dissolved carbon movement in a boreal peatland. J. Hydrol. 191, 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waddington J M, Roulet N T and Swanson R V 1996 Water table control of methane emission enhancement by vascular plants in boreal peatlands. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 22,775–22,785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wallen B 1986 Above and below ground dry mass of three main vascular plants on hummocks on a subarctic peat bog. Oikos 46, 51–56.Google Scholar
  44. Watson A, Stephen K D, Nedwell D B and Arah JRM 1997 Oxidation of methane in peat: Kinetics of methane and oxygen removal and the role of plant roots. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 1257–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whalen S C and Reeburgh W S 1990 Consumption of atmospheric methane by tundra soil. Nature 346, 160–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whalen S C, Reeburgh WS and Reimers C E 1996 Control of tundra methane emission by microbial oxidation. In Landscape Function and Disturbance in Arctic Tundra. Eds. JF Reynolds and JD Tenhunen. pp 257–274. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Whiting G J and Chanton J P 1992 Plant-dependent methane emission in a subarctic Canadian fen. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 6, 225–231.Google Scholar
  48. Whiting G J and Chanton J P 1993 Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands. Nature 364, 794–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams R T and Crawford R L 1984 Methane production in Minnesota peatlands. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 1266–1271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yavitt J B and Knapp A K 1998 Aspects of methane flow from sediment through emergent cattail (Typha latifolia) plants. New Phytol. 139, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Greenup
    • 1
  • M. A. Bradford
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. P. McNamara
    • 1
  • P. Ineson
    • 2
  • J. A. Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology MerlewoodCumbriaUK
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of ExeterDevonUK
  3. 3.Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of Sheffield, Western BankSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations